Testing Weak Form Market Efficiency and its Impact on Stock Valuation: Empirical Evidence from Stock Market in Bangladesh

Riyashad Ahmed, Delowar Hossain


The empirical study focus on the stock valuation with considering weak form efficiency where the objective is to find out the Bangladesh stock market is efficiency or not by testing the weak form efficiency. Here Daily trading price is used from 2011 to 2017 conceding daily index of Dhaka stock exchange and 38th leading company are considered to know the intrinsic price in the market. The CAPM model is used to find out the intrinsic value. we can reach a  result that if the market price of considering firm and intrinsic value is equal the market is efficient that means we a from efficient as only historical information  is reflected on the companies. We get the result that the Dhaka stock market is not efficient as the market price and intrinsic value is not equal. The arbitrage profit is possible.


Keywords: Efficiency Market; Weak Form efficiency; Intrinsic Value; Undervalued and Overvalued.

JEL Classification: G10, G11, G14

Full Text:



Ahmed, R., & Hossain, M. D. (2018). Testing Weak form Market Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Selected Asian Stock Markets. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(6), 790-798.

Bakshi, G., & Chen, Z. (2005). Stock valuation in dynamic economies. Journal of Financial Markets, 8(2), 111-151.

Carpenter, J. N. (1998). The exercise and valuation of executive stock options1. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(2), 127-158.

Do, H. Q., Bhatti, M. I., & Konya, L. (2016). On ASEAN Capital Market and Industry Integration: A Review. Corporate Ownership and Control, 2(1), 8-23.

French, C. W. (2003). The Treynor capital asset pricing model. Journal of Investment Management, 1(2), 60-72.

Jennergren, L. P., & Näslund, B. (1993). A Comment on" Valuation of Executive Stock Options and the FASB Proposal". The Accounting Review, 68(1), 179-183.

Jagannathan, R., & Wang, Z. (1996). The conditional CAPM and the cross‐section of expected returns. The Journal of finance, 51(1), 3-53.

Kumar, H., & Jawa, R. (2017). Efficient Market Hypothesis and Calendar Effects: Empirical Evidences from the Indian Stock Markets.

Lewellen, J., & Nagel, S. (2006). The conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies. Journal of financial economics, 82(2), 289-314.

Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 768-783.

Oprean, C., & Tanasescu, C. (2014). Effects of behavioural finance on emerging capital markets. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1710-1716.

Pástor, Ľ., & Pietro, V. (2003). Stock valuation and learning about profitability. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1749-1789.

Pitkethly, R. (1997). The valuation of patents: a review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research. Research Papers in Management Studies-University of Cambridge Judge Institute of Management Studies.

Rahman, M. S., Simon, H. M., & Hossain, M. M. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Weak Form Market Efficiency: Evidence from Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) of Bangladesh.

Sunder, S. (1975). Stock price and risk related to accounting changes in inventory valuation. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 305-315.

Shahid, M. N., & Sattar, A. (2017). Behavior of Calendar Anomalies, Market Conditions and Adaptive Market Hypothesis: Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 11(2).

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.

Tuyon, J., & Ahmad, Z. (2016). Behavioural finance perspectives on Malaysian stock market efficiency. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(1), 43-61.

Treynor, J. L. (1961). Market value, time, and risk.

Woo, C. Y. (1984). An empirical test of value-based planning models and implications. Management Science, 30(9), 1031-1050.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN (Print) 2086-1575       ISSN (Online) 2502-7112

View My Stats

Directory of Open Access Journals

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.