KESESUAIAN TINGKAT BERPIKIR SOAL UJIAN DENGAN TUJUAN PEMBELAJARAN PADA KEAHLIAN TEKNIK GAMBAR BANGUNAN SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN

Niswah Qurrota A’yun; Sutrisno

Abstract


Abstrak:Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui (1) proporsi tingkat berpikir pada soal ujian, (2) proporsi tingkat berpikir pada tujuan pembelajaran, dan (3) kesesuaian tingkat berpikir soal ujian dengan tujuan pembelajaran pada Keahlian Teknik Gambar Bangunan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif persentase dan chi-square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) proporsi soal ujian tingkat berpikir mengingat (C1): 37%, memahami (C2): 33%, aplikasi (C3): 30%; (2) proporsi tujuan pembelajaran tingkat berpikir C1: 1%, C2: 57%, C3: 42%; dan (3) terjadi ketidaksesuaian proporsi tingkat berpikir C1 dan C2 pada soal ujian dengan tujuan pembelajaran secara signifikan.

Kata-kata kunci: tingkat berpikir, soal ujian, tujuan pembelajaran.

Abstract: The level of thinking in the exam should be in line with the learning objectives for Building Technical Skills in Vocational High School. This study is aimed to learn about the ability of the thinking level in the exam and in the learning objectives, and the appropriateness of the level of thinking about the exam in learning of the Building Skills Technique in the Vocational High School. The method used in data collecting was documentation. The results were analyzed using descriptive percentage analysis and chi-square. The results showed that ability of student in the thinking-level during the exam (C1): 37%, understanding (C2): 33%, application (C3): 30%; (2) the ability to understand of the learning goals in thinking level were C1: 1%, C2: 57%, C3: 42%; and (3) inappropriate of the proportion of C1 and C2 thinking levels in the exam to the significance of the learning.

Keywords: level of thinking, exam question, learning objective


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.