PERILAKU KOMUNIKASI NONVEBAL: DOSEN TERBAIK DAN DOSEN TERBURUK

Nurmida Catherine Sitompul

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah Dosen yang dipersepsi sebagai dosen terbaik atau dosen terburuk berdasarkan perilaku komunikasi nonverbal ditentukan oleh latarbelakang budaya mahasiswa.    Penelitian berbentuk expo the fact.  Tipe perilaku komunikasi nonverbal dosen menjadi variabel bebas yang dibedakan atas 2 kategori yaitu Dosen terbaik (the best lecturer) dan  Dosen Terburuk (The worst lecturer). Variabel terikat adalah persepsi mahasiswa terhadap perilaku komunikasi nonverbal dosen dan latar belakang suku mahasiswa (Jawa, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Madura) menjadi variabel moderator. Subyek penelitian  adalah mahasiswa dari 4 Program Studi.  Data dikumpulkan dengan memyebarkan kuisioner (Nonverbal Immediacy Measure (NIM).  Terdapat 203 kuisioner yang layak untuk dianalisis. Uji beda rata-rata digunakan untuk mengetahui perbedaan persepsi dan  Kruskal-Walls One Way Anova digunakan untuk menguji hipotesisTemuan penelitian ini adalah Tidak terdapat perbedaan Persepsi Terhadap Perilaku komunikasi Nonverbal Dosen Antara Dosen Terbaik dan Terburuk berdasarkan latar belakang buday mahasiswa. 

 

 Kata kunciteacher nonverbal communication behavior; student’s perception; student’s culture; effective teaching


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alen, M.,B., J., Mabry, E., Burrell, N.A., & Timmerman C. E. (2006). Comparing Distance Education to Face-to-Face Methods of education. In Gayle, B.M., Preiss, R.W., Burrell, N. & Allen, M. (Eds.), Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances Through Meta-Analysis. (pp. 229-244). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publisher.

Aminullah. (2014). Model Komunikasi Antarbudaya Antara Etnik Madura dan Etnik Melayu di Kelurahan Roban Singkawang Kalimantan Barat. Tesis, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”. Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://repository.upnyk.ac.id/view/divisions/sch=5Fkom/2014.html.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2006) How Instructor Immediacy Behaviors Affect Student Satisfaction and Learning in Web-Based Courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, Retrieved from http://www.alnresearch.org/data_files/articles/full_text/arbaugh01.pdf

Babad, E. (2005). Guessing Teachers’ Differential Treatment Of High- And Low-Achievers From Thin Slices Of Their Public Lecturing Behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2) 124-134.

Baringer, D. K., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Immediacy in the Classroom: Student Immediacy. Communication Education 49, 178-186.

Baylor, A.L., and Kim, S. (2009). Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Computer in Human Behavior 25 (2009) 450-457

Bunga, B. N. (2007). Budaya Korea dan Bima Melalui Perspektif Geert Hofstede. Makalah perkuliahan. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Program Studi Magister Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada. (0nline)

Chesebro, J. L. & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The Relationship of Teacher Clarity and Immediacy with Student State Receiver Apprehension, Affect, and Cognitive Learning. Communication Education 50(1), 59-68.

Degeng, N. S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian.

Etika Bisnis. 2012. Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Retrieved from http://etikabisnis.blogspot.com/2012/02/komunikasi-antar-budaya.html. diakses Januari 2015

Georgakopoulos, Alexia and Guerrero, Laura K. (2010). Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Nonverbal and Verbal Communication: A Comparison of Best and Worst Professors across Six Cultures. International Education Studies 3(2), 3-16.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviour, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hurt, H. Thomas, S., Michael D. and McCroskey, J.C. (1978). Communication in the Classroom.

Kurniawan, A.P., & Hasanat, N.U. (2007). Perbedaan Ekspresi Emosi pada Beberapa Tingkat Generasi Suku Jawa di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol.34 (1): 1-17.

Maniyeni, A.M.D. (2002). Karakteristik Perilaku Komunikasi Nonverbal Dosen Universitas Artha Wacana Kupang Berdasarkan Empat Etnis di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Tesis, Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Matsumoto, D. (2006). Culture and Nonverbal Behavior. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Nonverbal Communication (219-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H.C. (2013). Cultural Similarities and Differences in Emblematic Gestures. Journal Nonverbal Behavior (2013) 37:1–27

McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J.M. and Barraclough, R.A. (1995). A Cross-cultural and Multi-Behavioral Analysis of the Relationship between Nonverbal Immediacy and Teacher Evaluation. Communication Education 44, 281-290

McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., and Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal Immediacy and Cognitive Learning: A Cross-cultural Investigation. Communication Education, 45: 200-211.

McDuff, D., Girard, J.M., & Kaliouby, R.E. (2017). Large-Scale Observational Evidence of Cross-Cultural Differences in Facial Behavior. Journal Nonverbal Behavior (2017) 41:1–19

Merkin, R.S. & Ramadan, R. (2016). Communication practices in the US and Syria. SpringerPlus (2016) 5:845

Pflug, J. (2011). Contextuality and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Cross Cultural Comparison. Computer in Human Behavior 27(2011) 131-137.

Richmond, V., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. (1987). The Relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed). Communication Yearbook, 10, (pp. 574-590) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Rohmiati. (2011). Stereotip dan Prasangka dalam Komunikasi Antar Etnis (Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis Komunikasi antara Budaya). Jurnal ISIP. Retrieved from http://www.iisip.ac.id/content/stereotip-dan-prasangka-dalam-komunikasi-antar-etnis-suatu-tinjauan-teoritis-komunikasi-anta.

Seob, Kim Geung. (2014). Komunikasi Antara Budaya Korea dan Indonesia: Kajian tentang Perilaku Masyarakat Korea dan Jawa. Pusat Studi Korea, Universitas Gajah Mada. Retrieved from elisa1.ugm.ac.id/.../komunikasi%20antarbudaya.doc.

Thepsoonthorn, C., Yokozuka, T., Miura, S., Ogawa K., & Miyake, Y. (2016). Prior Knowledge Facilitates Mutual Gaze Convergence and Head Nodding Synchrony in Face-to-face Communication. 1Scientific RepoRts | 6:38261 | DOI: 10.1038/srep38261. Retrieved from www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Sitompul, N.C. (2014). Karakteristik Perilaku Nonverbal Guru Peserta Program Profesi Keguruan Sekolah Dasar (PPGSD) pada Praktek Mengajar di Laboratorium Microteaching. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang 22 November 2014. Retrieved from (http://pasca.um.ac.id

Valencic, K. M., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2005). The Relationship between Teachers’ Temperament and Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Communication Behavior, Retrieved from http://www.JamesCMcCroskey.com/electronic/002.htm

Ugurel, Merih. (2010). Differences between Teacher’s Nonverbal Communication in Different Cultures. Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2010-08-1704.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


INDEXED BYTOOLSPLAGIARISM CHECKARTICLE TEMPLATE

Creative Commons License
Edcomtech is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
analytics View My Stats