The Level of Support For Successful Learning in Inclusive Primary School in Banjarmasin

Amka Amka, Dewi Ekasari Kusumastuti


The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the level of support for successful learning in Inclusive Primary Schools in Banjarmasin. It reviewed three aspects of success support, namely: institutional aspects, teacher aspects, and aspects of facilities and infrastructure. These three aspects are very essential to support the success of inclusion learning that researchers believe makes a strong contribution. The approach in this study was a quantitative approach with survey research. The data sources in this study were 10 inclusive primary school principals in the city of Banjarmasin and secondary data sources were documentation, photos, records of results of activities and letters. Data collection techniques in this study were observation and documentation. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. This research was conducted by selecting 10 samples of Inclusive Primary Schools in Banjarmasin City. The results indicate that the level of support for successful learning in Banjarmasin Inclusive Primary School in terms of teacher aspects is 44%, 46% for institutional aspects, and 10% for facilities and infrastructure aspects. This means that the level of support for teacher aspects and institutional aspects is included in the category of moderate support, while the level of support for infrastructure and facilities is included in the category of very low


The Level of Support; Learning Success; Inclusive

Full Text:



Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: the role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. doi:10.1080/13603110802504903

Alsa, A. (2004). Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif serta Kombinasinya dalam Penelitian Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D., & Barton, L. (2016). Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives. Routledge.

Carter, E. W., & Hughes, C. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 174-185.

Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2007). Inclusive education: What makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities?. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 16-30.

European Commission. (2010). European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe. Brussels: European

Fisher, M., & Meyer, L. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27(3), 165-174.

Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., Pascoe, S., & King, B. S. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(3), 183-193.

Garnida, D. (2009). Sistem Dukungan (Supporting System) Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusi. Bandung: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Taman Kanak-Kanak dan Pendidikan Luar Biasa

Grant, M. C., & Jones-Goods, K. M. (2016). Identifying and Correcting Barriers to Successful Inclusive Practices: A Literature Review. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 64-71.

Hodkinson, A. (2012). All present and Correct: Exclusionary Inclusion Within the English Educational System. Disability and Society, 27(5), 675-688.

Peck, C. A., Staub, D., Gallucci, C., & Schwartz, I. (2004). Parent perception of the impacts of inclusion on their nondisabled child. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(2), 135-143.

Pivik, J., McComas, J., & Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and Facilitators to Inclusive Education. Exceptional Children, 69(1), 97–107. doi:10.1177/001440290206900107

Pivik, J. R. (2010). The Perspective of Children and Youth : How Different Stakeholders Identify Architectural Barriers for Inclusion in Schools. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 510-517.

Plows., Vicky., & Whitburn, B. (2017). Inclusive Education: Making sense of Everyday Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher

Shevlin, M., Winter, E., & Flynn, P. (2013). Developing inclusive practice: Teacher perceptions of opportunities and constraints in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(10), 1119-1133.

Sunardi. (1997). Kecenderungan Dalam Pendidikan Luar Biasa. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas.

Sunaryo. (2009). Manajemen Pendidikan Inklusif (Konsep, Kebijakan, dan Implementasinya dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Luar Biasa). Bandung : Jurusan PLB FIP UPI Bandung.

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Right of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from

Valeo, A. (2008). Inclusive Education Support Systems: Teacher and Administrator Views. International Journal of Special Education, 23(2), 8-16.

Yusuf, M. (2012). Kinerja Kepala Sekolah dan Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Pendidikan Inklusif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 18(4), 382-393..

Yusuf, M., Sasmoko, S., & Indrianti, Y. Inclusive Education Management Model to Improve Principal and Teacher Performance in Primary Schools. In Proceeding of International Conference on Art, Language, and Culture (pp. 226-237).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of ICSAR

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of ICSAR is Indexing by:



counter  ---> View Statistic

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.