Intan Sari Rufiana, Cholis Sa'dijah, Subanji Subanji, Hery Susanto, Abdur Rahman As'ari


This research aims at describing students’ statistical reasoning in graphics statistics representation related to distribution. The subjects of this research were students of semester IV of Program of Study Mathematics Education of Muhammadiyah University Ponorogo who have taken a basic statistics course. These subjects were chosen because they have taken a course related to descriptive statistics which discusses graphics representation and data distribution. The data collection technique used essay test related to graphics representation. In addition, an interview was also conducted to confirm students’ answer. This research finding shows that statistical reasoning of semester IV students of Mathematics Education whose statistics ability is poor belong to pre-structural level and whose statistics ability is high belong to multi-structural and relational level. The high skilled students could conclude the data with statistical reason even though they used informal terms. Students with multi-structural and relational level regard that variety is a standard showing the numbers of different data among others, not on the different value from the average. Students with relational reasoning level were able to generate graphics concluding by connecting the central tendency and distribution scale.

Full Text:



Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Learning to Reason about Distribution. In The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and thinking (pp. 147–168). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ben-zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking, (June 2014).

Biggs, J. ., & Collis, K. . (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic.

Chance, B. L., & Garfield, J. B. (2001). New approaches to gathering data on student learning for research in statistics education. {Proceedings of the 53rd Session of the International Statistical Institute, August 2001}. Retrieved from

delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Learning: A Commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3).

Fieldman, A., Konold, C., Coulter, B., & Conroy, B. (2000). Network Science, a Decade Later: The Internet and Classroom Learning. Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum.

Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124.

Ginsburg, A., & Leinwand, S. (2009). Informing grades 1-6 Mathematics Standards Development: What Can Be Learned From High-Performing Hong Kong, Korea and Singapore? Prepared For: Human Resource Development Working Group Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Retrieved from

Jacob, B. L. (2013). The development of introductory statistics students’ informal inferential reasoning and its relationship to formal inferential reasoning. Retrieved from

Kader, G. D., & Perry, M. (2007). Variability for Categorical Variables. Journal of Statistics Education, 15(2), 1–17. Retrieved from

Konold, C., & Higgins, T. (2002). Konold.pdf. In S. J. Russell & D. Schifter &V. Bastable (Eds.) (pp. 165–201). Seymour.

Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Conceptualizing an Average as A Stable Feature of a Noisy Process. In The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 169–199). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Leman, S. C., & House, L. (2012). Improving Mr. Miyagi’s Coaching Style: Teaching Data Analytics with Interactive Data Visualizations. Chance, 25(2), 4–12.

Lovett, M. (2001). A collaborative convergence on studying reasoning processes: A case study in statistics. Cognition and Instruction: 25 Years of Progress, 25, 347–384.

Miller-Jones. (1991). Informal Reasoning in Inner-City Children. In J. F. Voos, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mokros, J., & Russell, S. J. (1995). Children’s concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 20–39.

Moore, D. S. (1997). New Pedagogy and New Content: The Case of Statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123.

Perkins, D. ., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ralph, J., & Anthony, B. (1991). Contexts of informal reasoning: Commentary. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education (pp. 131–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006). An emerging hierarchy of reasoning about distribution: From a variation perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 46–68. Retrieved from

Sedlmeier, P. (2002). Improving Statistical Reasoning by Using Right Representational Format. Sciences-New York, 2000–2003.

Shaughnessy, J. M., Ciancetta, M., Best, K., & Noll, J. (2005). Secondary and Middle School Students’ Attention to Variability When Comparing Data Sets. In Secondary and Middle School Students Attention to Variability when Comparing Data Sets. Anahiem. CA.: Paper presentation at The Research Pressesion of the 82nd Anual Meeting of The National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

Shaugnessy, J. ., Chance, B., & Kranendonk, H. (2009). The focus in High School Mathematics Reasoning and Sense Making. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., Delmas, R., & Reading, C. (2008). A Framework to Support research on Informal Inferential Reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 40–58. Retrieved from


  • There are currently no refbacks.

International Journal of Insight for Mathematics Teaching