Validity and Reliability of Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale

Paul Arjanto, Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Raden Bambang Sumarsono


The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Scale in Indonesia. LPC is a self-report instrument that measures the level of relationship between coworkers. Validation was carried out with a sample of 244 respondents spread throughout Indonesia. The results showed that the LPC has a reliability index with Cronbach's Alpha is 0.754 and the validity by factor analysis shows KMO and Bartlett's Test 0.818 with a significance of 0.000 and an anti-image correlation value > 0.5. Formed 1 factor that can explain 46.875% of the variability. factor loading ( factor loading ) of each item between 0.186 - 0.808. The results of this study indicate that LPC can be used as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the level of relationship between coworkers.


least preferred coworker; factor analysis; validity

Full Text:



Ashour, A. S. (1973). The Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: An evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 9: 339-355.

Ayman, R. (2002). Contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Challenges and achievements. In L. L.

Fiedler, F. E. (1953) Quantitative Studies in the Role of Therapists' Feelings Toward Their Patients. Psychotherapy Theory and Research. New York: Ronald Press

Fiedler, F. E. (1954). Assumed Similarity Measures as Predictors of Team Effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1): 381-388.

Fiedler, F. E. (1958). Leader Attitudes and Group Effectiveness. Urbana, III: University of Illinois Press.

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fiedler, F. E. . (1971). Validation and extension of the Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: A review of empirical findings. Psychological Bulletin. 76: 128-148.

Fiedler, F. E., and Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and Effective Management Glenview. Illinois: Scott-Foresman.

Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1984). Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept. New York: Wiley.

Graen, G. B., Alvares, K., Orris, J. B., and Martella, J. A. (1970). Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness: Antecedent and evidential results. Psychological Bulletin. 74: 185-296.

McMahon, J. T. (1972). The Contingency Theory: Logic and method revisited. Personnel Psychology. 25: 697-710.

Mitchell, T., Biglan, A., Oncken, G. R., and Fiedler, F. E. (1970) The Contingency Model: Criticism and suggestions. Academy of Management Journal. 13: 253-267.

Posthuma, A. B. (1970). Normative Data on the Least Preferred Coworker Scale (LPC) and the Group Atmosphere Questionnaire (GA). Seattle: University of Washington.

Rice, R. W. (1978a). Psychometric Properties of the Esteem for Least Preferred Coworker (LPC Scale). The Academy of Management Review, 3(1): 106-118.

Rice, R. W. (1978b). Construct validity of the Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale. Psychological Bulletin. 85: 1199-1237.

Saiful, Bolotio, R., dan Ardianto. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kontigensi Model Least Preferred Coworker dan Iklim Sekolah terhadap Peningkatan Produktivitas Kerja Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah di Kota Bitung. Journal of Islamic Education Policy. 2(2): 140-151.

Schriesheim, C. A. and Kerr, S. (1977). Theories and measures of leadership: A critical appraisal of current and future directions. In J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The Cutting Edge Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Lisensi Creative Commons




Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter IRBEJ Stats.