ANALISIS KESIAPAN PESERTA DIDIK DAN GURU PADA ASESMEN NASIONAL (ASESMEN KOMPETENSI MINIMUM, SURVEY KARAKTER, DAN SURVEY LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR

Deni Ainur Rokhim, Binti Nuriyati Rahayu, Laila Nur Alfiah, Ristiwi Peni, Bambang Wahyudi, Asnan Wahyudi, Sutomo Sutomo, Hayuni Retno Widarti

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to see and analyze the readiness of teachers and students in the National Assessment. The research was conducted with a survey method through the distribution of google form questionnaires. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results of the study group of students showed that 46.6% of students understood national assessment and 53.2% of students did not understand well about national assessment. This is due to the fact that the education unit has not yet disseminated the implementation of the national assessment which has three instruments including the Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM), learning surveys and learning environment surveys. The results of the teacher group research stated that 75% of teachers understood national assessment and 25% of teachers did not understand national assessment. A national assessment is carried out to evaluate the input, process, and quality of teaching and learning in the classroom so as to improve the quality of Indonesian education.

 

Keywords: analysis of the readiness of teachers; students; national assessment

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kesiapan guru dan peserta didik dalam Asesmen Nasional. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode survei melalui penyebaran angket google form. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian kelompok peserta didik menujukkan bahwa 46,6% peserta didik memahami mengenai asesmen nasional dan 53,2% peserta didik belum memahami dengan baik mengenai asesmen nasional. Hal ini disebabkan karena satuan pendidikan terkait belum melakukan sosialisasi penerapan asesmen nasional yang memiliki tiga instrumen penilaian meliputi Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM), survey belajar, dan survey lingkungan belajar. Hasil penelitian kelompok guru menyatakan bahwa 75% guru memahami mengenai asesmen nasional dan 25% guru belum memahami mengenai asesmen nasional. Asesmen nasional dilakukan untuk melakukan evaluasi terhadap input, proses, dan kualitas belajar-mengajar di kelas sehingga meningkatkan mutu pendidikan Indonesia.

 

Kata kunci: analisis kesiapan guru; peserta didik; asesmen nasional


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Zainal. 2011. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ditjen P3GTK Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. Di Tengah Pandemi Virus Korona, Direktorat P3GTK Mengadakan Uji Coba Survei Karakter dan Lingkungan Belajar, (Online), (https://p3gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/di-tengah-pandemi-virus-korona-direktorat-p3gtk-mengadakan-uji-coba-survei-karakter-danlingkungan-belajar-a88xihtv), diakses 17 Desember 2020.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education8th edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Hadi, Syamsul & Novaliyosi. 2019. TIMSS Indonesia (Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study). Prosiding disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, 19 Januari.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2019.Tahun 2021, Ujian Nasional Diganti Asesmen Kompetensi dan Survei Karakter, (Online), https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/12/tahun-2021-ujian-nasional-diganti-asesmen-kompetensi-dan-survei-karakter, diakses 17 Desember 2020.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. Asesmen Nasional Lembar Tanya Jawab.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. Asesmen Nasional sebagai Penanda Perubahan Paradigma Evaluasi Pendidikan, (Online) https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/10/asesmen-nasional-sebagai-penanda-perubahan-paradigma-evaluasi-pendidikan, diakses 17 Desember 2020.

Mullis, Ina V.S. Martin, Michael O. Foy, Pierre Hooper, Martin. Boston College , Chestnut Hill, MA. 2016a. TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Mullis, Ina V.S. Martin, Michael O. Foy, Pierre Hooper, Martin. Boston College , Chestnut Hill, MA. 2016b. TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2018.PISA 2018 Result. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar DanMenengah, BSNP (online). (http://bsnp-indonesia.org/id/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/permendikbud-no-104-tahun-2014.pdf.), diakses 24 Desember 2020.

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2019. Asesmen Nasional Lembar Tanya Jawab, (Online), http://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/

filemanager/2020/10/Tanya%20Jawab%20AKM.pdf, diakses 17 Desember 2020.

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. 2020. Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM)

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R& D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tan, Charlene. 2017. PISA and education reform in Shanghai. Critical Studiesin Education, 60(3), 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2017.1285336.

Wilson,Mark. 2018. Making Measurement Important for Education: The Crucial Roleof Classroom Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice Spring, 37(1), 5–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12188.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um027v4i12021p61

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Deni Ainur Rokhim, Binti Nuriyati Rahayu, Laila Nur Alfiah, Ristiwi Peni, Bambang Wahyudi, Asnan Wahyudi, Sutomo Sutomo, Hayuni Retno Widarti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

 

  

 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.