Keberfungsian Model ABC Tschudi untuk Internalisasi Budaya Belajar Mahasiswa

Andi Mappiare-AT, Lutfi Fauzan

Abstract


Abstract: This research aimed to find: (1) the difficulties possibly faced by subjects in managing personal construct when filling Tschudi ABC format; (2) key personal construct recognized by subjects in their present and desired positions; (3) the results of subjects’ learning culture internalization to the implementation of Tschudi ABC Model. This study used a qualitative approach with the type of Classroom Action Research, the empirical phenomenological variant. The observed subjects were determined by purposive sampling, taken from the students of Multicultural Counseling class. The research informants were determined through snowballing. The data collection was conducted via a medium participatory observation and in-depth interview. The individual analysis was employed in the form of dynamic analysis of the research subjects’ individual personality. This research found that: (1) there was a difficulty in the form of contradiction and disparity in personal construct management. According to the subjects, compromise and synchronization of thoughts and attitudes were effective in settling the self-denial and gap; (2) The tendency of the change of subjects’ key personal construct was intentional accompanied by discursive awareness versus withdrawal and stagnant. There was a change of key personal construct to the more productive and non-productive orientation; (3) The function of “good news” versus “bad news” was very strong in the internalization of subjects’ learning culture. Providing “good news” (positive feedback) gave rise to more non-formal and affective internalization of learning culture with the purpose stated consciously and obviously, as well as concrete, clear, decisive, and straightforward plans.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menemukan: (1) kemungkinan kesulitan yang dihadapi oleh subjek dalam kelola konstruk pribadi ketika mengisi format ABC Tschudi; (2) konstruk pribadi kunci yang dikenali oleh para subjek dalam posisi sekarang dan posisi yang dituju; (3) hasil internalisasi budaya belajar subjek atas penerapan Model ABC Tschudi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif tipe penelitian tindakan kelas, varian fenomenologi empirik. Subjek terteliti ditetapkan melalui teknik “purposive sampling”, para peserta kuliah dalam kelas Konseling Multibudaya. Informan penelitian ditetapkan secara snowballing. Pengumpulan data melalui observasi berpartisipasi medium dan wawancara mendalam. Digunakan unit analisis individual yaitu analisis dinamika konstruk pribadi perseorangan dari subjek penelitian. Temuan penelitian ini adalah: (1) ada kesulitan berupa pertentangan dan kesenjangan dalam kelola konstruk pribadi. Kompromi dan sinkronisasi pemikiran serta sikap merupakan cara efektif yang dinyatakan oleh subjek untuk mengatasi pertentangan dan kesenjangan dalam diri; (2) kecenderungan perubahan konstruksi pribadi kunci subjek adalah intensional disertai kesadaran diskursif versus withdrawal dan stagnan. Ada perubahan konstruk pribadi kunci ke arah yang lebih produktif dan ada yang ke arah non-produktif; (3) sangat kuat fungsi “kabar gembira” versus “bukan kabar gembira” dalam internalisasi budaya belajar subjek. Pemberian “kabar gembira” (balikan positif) menimbulkan internalisasi budaya belajar secara lebih non-formal afektif dengan tujuan yang dinyatakan secara sadar dan jelas, dan rencana tindakan yang konkret, jelas, tegas, dan lugas.


Keywords


group guidance; learning culture; good news; Tschudi ABC Model; bimbingan kelompok; budaya belajar; kabar gembira; Model ABC Tschudi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Shara, I. (2015). Learning and Teaching Between Enjoyment and Boredom As Realized by The Students: A Survey from The Educational Field. European Scientific Journal, 11(19), 146–168.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Sage.

Caputi, P., Viney, L. L., Walker, B. M., & Crittenden, N. (2012). Personal Construct Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.

Casebow, R. (2016). Working with Resistance to Change 1: The ABC Model. Diambil pada 16 Februari, 2018, dari http://www.edinburghalexandercentre.com/blog/item/72-working-with-resistance-to-change-1-the-abc-model

Chiari, G. (2017). George A. Kelly and His Personal Construct Theory. Florence, Italy: The George Kelly Society.

Chuang, C.-H., Chen, Y.-N., Tsai, L.-W., Lee, C.-C., & Tsai, H.-C. (2014). Improving Learning Performance with Happiness by Interactive Scenarios. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/807347

Critchlow, R. (2007). Robert Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction: “Organization is The Hallmark of Effective Instructional Materials.” Diambil 21 Oktober, 2010, dari http://budapest.usembassy.gov/uploads/images/94KMTTRtqw2d0Ii-AmOyeA/gagnes_nine_events_of_instruction.ppt

Eil, D., & Rao, J. M. (2011). The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(2), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.2.114

Fisher, J. (2018). Resistance to Change? The ABC Technique. Diambil 16 Desember, 2018, dari https://www.theabp.org.uk/news/change-resistance-to-change-the-abc-model.aspx

Karpicke, J., & Roediger III, H. (2007). Repeated Retrieval During Learning is The Key to Long-Term Retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004

Khadjooi, K., Rostami, K., & Ishaq, S. (2011). How to Use Gagne’s Model of Instructional Design in Teaching Psychomotor Skills. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 4(3), 116–119.

O’Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (1993). Introducing NLP Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Psychological Skills for Understanding and Influencing People. California: Harper Collins.

Ozkaramanli, D., Desmet, P. M. A., & Özcan, E. (2016). Beyond Resolving Dilemmas: Three Design Directions for Addressing Intrapersonal Concern Conflicts. Design Issues, 32(3), 78–91.

Paszkowska-Rogacz, A., & Kabzinska, Z. (2012). Applications of Kelly’s personal Construct Theory to Vocational Guidance. Psychology Research, 2(7), 408–421.

Schell, J. A., & Porter, J. R. (2018). Applying the Science of Learning to Classroom Teaching: The Critical Importance of Aligning Learning with Testing. Journal of Food Science Education, 17(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12141

Taber, K. (2016). Personal Construct Theory. Diambil 16 Februari, 2018, dari http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/kst24/EdResMethod/PCT.html

Tschudi, F., & Winter, D. (2012). The ABC Model Revisited. Dalam P. Caputi, L. L. Viney, B. M. Walker, & N. Crittenden (Eds.), Personal Construct Methodology (hal. 89–108). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um001v4i22019p053

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Andi Mappiare-AT, Lutfi Fauzan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling
ISSN 2503-3417 (online), ISSN 2548-4311 (print)
Email: jkbk.fip@um.ac.id

Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling is indexed by:

google.pngipiii.pnggoogle.pngpkpp.png

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

  View Visitor Stats