Pengembangan Skala Keyakinan Irasional dalam Penulisan Skripsi

Diniy Hidayatur Rahman

Abstract


Abstract: Previous studies have shown that irrational beliefs contribute significantly to the procrastination, including the thesis-writing procrastination. Unfortunately, there are no scales that specifically can measure the beliefs in the thesis writing context. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a scale called the Skala Keyakinan Irasional dalam Penyusunan Skripsi (SKI-S). The scale was developed based on irrational belief construct proposed by Albert Ellis in the context of thesis writing. To achieve the aim, the study applied a research and development design involving four steps: (1) defining the construct; (2) developing the measurement model; (3) carrying out confirmatory factor analysis; and (4) checking the validity of the measurement model. 200 undergraduate students taking their 9th to 14th semester were involved in the study. 86 items were successfully validated which were classified into demandingness subscale (16 items); catastrophizing subscale (20 items); self-depreciation subscale (17 items); and low frustration tolerance subscales (20 items).

Abstrak: Beberapa hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa keyakinan irasional berkontribusi pada terjadinya prokrastinasi, termasuk prokrastinasi dalam penulisan skripsi. Sampai saat ini belum dijumpai alat ukur yang secara khusus mengukur keyakinan irasional dalam konteks dimaksud. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan sebuah alat ukur yang diberi nama Skala Keyakinan Irasional dalam Penyusunan Skripsi (SKI-S). Skala ini dikembangkan berdasarkan konstruk keyakinan irasional yang dikemukakan oleh Albert Ellis dengan menambahkan konteks penulisan skripsi ke dalam butir-butir skala. Untuk mencapai tujuan yang telah disebutkan, penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian pengembangan dengan langkah-langkah: (1) mendefinisikan konstruk; (2) mengembangkan model pengukuran; (3) melakukan analisis faktor konfirmatori; dan (4) mengecek validitas model pengukuran. Subjek yang terlibat dalam pengembangan ini adalah 200 mahasiswa yang terlambat lulus (sedang menempuh semester sembilan hingga 14). Hasil menunjukkan 86 butir SKI-S valid dan reliabel, sedangkan 178 butir lainnya tidak memenuhi syarat. Secara rinci, 86 butir tersebut terdiri dari: 16 butir subskala demandingness; 20 butir subskala catastrophizing; 17 butir subskala self-depreciation; dan 20 butir subskala low frustration tolerance.


Keywords


irrational beliefs; scale; thesis writing; keyakinan irasional; skala; skripsi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balkis, M., Duru, E., & Bulus, M. (2013). Analysis of The Relation Between Academic Procrastination, Academic Rational/Irrational Beliefs, Time Preferences to Study for Exams, and Academic Achievement: A structural Model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0142-5

Burgess, P. M. (1986). Belief Systems and Emotional Disturbance: An Evaluation of The Rational-Emotive Model. University of Melbourne.

DiGiuseppe, R., Leaf, R., Gorman, B., & Robin, M. W. (2018). The Development of A Measure of Irrational/Rational Beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 36(1), 47–79.

Dryden, W. (2012). Dealing with Procrastination: The REBT Approach and A Demonstration Session. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 30(4), 264–281.

Dryden, W., & Neenan, M. (2004). Rational Emotive Behavioural Counselling in Action. Sage.

Ellis, A., David, D., & Lynn, S. J. (2010). Rational and Irrational Beliefs: A Historical and Conceptual Perspective. Rational and Irrational Beliefs: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice, 3–22.

Ellis, A., & Harper, R. A. (1961). A Guide to Rational Living.

Ferdinand, A. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Harrington, N. (2005). It’s Too Difficult! Frustration Intolerance Beliefs and Procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 873–883.

Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., & Boduszek, D. (2014). Modeling The Structure of The Attitudes and Belief Scale 2 using CFA and Bifactor Approaches: Toward The Development of An Abbreviated Version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43(1), 60–71.

Jones, R. G. (1968). A Factored Measure of Ellis’ Irrational Belief System with Personality and Maladjustment Correlates. Texas Tech University.

Malouff, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (1986). Development and Validation of A Measure of Irrational Belief. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(6), 860.

Mogoase, C., Stefan, S., & David, D. (2013). How Do We Measure Rational and Irrational Beliefs? The Development of Rational and Irrational Beliefs Scale (RAIBS)-A New Theory-Driven Measure. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 13(2A), 529.

Ozer, B. U., Demir, A., & Ferrari, J. R. (2013). Reducing Academic Procrastination through A Group Treatment Program: A pilot study. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 31(3), 127–135.

Rahman, D. H. (2016). Integrating Al-Qur’an with Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy in Counseling Muslim Students. Dalam 2nd ICET Theme:“Improving The Quality of Education and Training Through Strengthening Networking” (hal. 211–216). Malang.

Shorkey, C. T., & Whiteman, V. L. (1977). Development of The Rational Behavior Inventory: Initial Validity and Reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 527–534.

Szentagotai, A., & Jones, J. (2010). The Behavioral Consequences of Irrational Deliefs. Dalam D. David, S. J. Lynn, & A. Ellis (Ed.), Rational and Irrational Beliefs: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice (hal. 75–97). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Terjesen, M. D., Salhany, J., & Sciutto, M. J. (2009). A Psychometric Review of Measures of Irrational Beliefs: Implications for Psychotherapy. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 83–96.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um001v4i12019p001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Diniy Hidayatur Rahman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling
ISSN 2503-3417 (online), ISSN 2548-4311 (print)
Email: jkbk.fip@um.ac.id

Find Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling on:

google.pngipiii.pnggoogle.png

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

  View Visitor Stats