Development of a Ferrite-Based Electromagnetic Wave Detector

Muhammad Hanish Zakariah, Poppy Puspitasari, Nur Aliza Ahmad


Direct detection of hydrocarbon by an active source using electromagnetic (EM) wave termed Sea Bed Logging (SBL) has shown very promising results. However, currently available electromagnetic wave technology has a number of challenges including sensitivity and lapsed time. Our initial response to this issue is to develop a ferrite-based EM wave detector for Sea Bed Logging (SBL). Ferrite bar and copper rings in various diameters were used as detector 1 (D1). For Detector 2 (D2), toroid added with copper wires in different lengths at the centre of it were used. The first experiment is to determine the inductance and resistance for both detectors by using LCR meter. We obtained the highest inductance value of 0.02530 mH at the ferrite bar when it was paired with a 15 cm diameter copper ring and 0.00526 mH for D2 using a 100 cm copper wire placed at the centre of the toroid. The highest resistivity for D1 was measured at ferrite bar paired with a 15 cm diameter  copper ring and 1.099 Ω when using 20 cm length of copper wire. The second interest deals with voltage peak-to-peak (Vp-p) value for both detectors by using oscilloscope. The highest voltage value at the ferrite bar of D1 was 25.30 mV. While at D2, the highest voltage measured was 27.70 mV when using a 100 cm copper wire. The third premise is the comparison of sensitivity and lapsed time for both detectors. It was found that D1 was 61% more sensitive than D2 but had higher lapsed time than D2.


Sea Bed Logging, Detector, Sensitivity,Lapsed time

Full Text:



T. Eidesmo, S.Ellingsrud, L.M.Macgregor, S.Constable, M.C Sinha, S.Johansen, H.Westerdahl, and F.N Kong. Remote detection of hydrocarbon filled layers using marine controlled source electromagnetic sounding. EAGE 64th Conference & Exhibition, Florence, Italy (2002).

GEO ExPro (June 2004) The same PRINCIPLE as in borehole logging (pp. 28-30).

X C.Halfdan, GEO ExPro Proving the concept(June 2004).

F. Keisuke. High-Responsive Inductive Electromagnetic Sensor (Sept 2003), IEEE Transactions on Magnetic, Vol. 39, No. 5.

A.T Daniel & A.T James. Electromagnetic detection of a 410-km-deep melt layer in the Southwestern United States (pp. 991-994), Nature (21 June 2007)).

H. Huang and I.J. Won Electromagnetic detection of buried metallic objects using quad-quad conductivity. GEOPHYSICS VOL. 69. NO 6.

M.N.O Sadiku. Elements of electromagnetic. (pp. 336) Oxford University Press, New York. (2001).

L.L Adams, T.P Cox, A.F James, A.M Richard, L.W Thompson. Electromagnetic wave logging system for determining resistivity and dielectric constant of earth formations. U.S Patent Documents: 2900595, 3900879, 3944910, 3993944 and 4012689.

Fawwaz T. Ulaby Electromagnetic for engineers. (pp.16). Pearson International Edition, New Jersey. (2005) .

T. Eidesmo, S.Ellingsrud, L.M.Macgregor, S.Constable, M.C Sinha, S.Johansen, H.Westerdahl, and F.N Kong. Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas. (pp.144-152) First Break Vol.20.3 (2002).

Noorhana Y, A. Salwani., M.Z Hasnah, D. Hanita, A. A. Azizuddin and H. Hasnidar (2008) . Fabrication and phase, morphology and magnetic characterisation of Nickel Zink ferrite as an electromagnetic detector. Unpublished (2008).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats