Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Komitmen Generasi Z terhadap Pancasila

Riza Primahendra, Tri Adi Sumbogo, Reney Aquino Lensun, Sugiyanto Sugiyanto

Abstract


This study intended to identify the influence of Generation Z’s perceptions on political parties and political education by mediating political leadership on the commitment to Pancasila. The study used a Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. The population was high school students in Jakarta. The sample was 82 students in XI grade. The results showed the perception of political parties influenced the views of political leadership (0.627). Perceptions of political parties influenced Pancasila’s commitment (0.357). The strongest influence was found to be in political education on the commitment of the Pancasila (0.722). Political education did not influence the views of political leadership (-0.009). The view of political leadership did not influence the commitment of the Pancasila (-0.194). The view of political leadership was not a factor influencing generation Z’s commitment to Pancasila. Generation Z’s commitment to Pancasila was influenced by two factors, namely political parties and political education. Political education was the highest factor influencing generation Z’s commitment to Pancasila.


Keywords


Pancasila’s commitment, political education, political leadership, the z generation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akmal, M. (2018). The Roles of Digital Democracy on Political Education for Young Generation. Dalam Proceedings of MICoMS 2017 (Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, 1, 43-48. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https:// doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00071

Azhari, S., & Ferdhi, G. (2019). Membatasi Para Pelanggar: Laporan Tahunan Kemerdekaan Beragama Berkeyakinan. Jakarta: Wahid Foundation.

Asmika, R & Suharno. (2019). Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Politik Melalui Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan untuk Meningkatkan Kesadaran Politik Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 282-290. http:// dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p282-290

Bentzen, T. Ø., Lo, C., & Winsvold, M. (2019). Strengthening Local Political Leadership Through Institutional Design: How and Why. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.201 9.1690994.

Cwalina, W., & Drzewiecka, M. (2019). Who are the Political Leaders We are Looking for? Candidate Positioning in Terms of Leadership Style. A Cross-Cultural Study in Goleman’s Typology. Journal of Political Marketing, 18(4), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/153 77857.2019.1678908.

Diana. (2018). Pendidikan Politik Generasi Y Guna Menghilangkan Primordialisme Politik. Dedikasi, 19(2), 29-36.

Diemer, M. A., Voight, A. M., Marchand, A. D., & Bañales, J. (2019). Political Identification, Political Ideology, and Critical Social Analysis of Inequality Among Marginalized Youth. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000559.

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. Pew Research Center. Diakses dari https:// pewrsr.ch/3cV5pmw

Dja’far, A. M., Taqwa, L., & Kholisoh, S. (2017). Intoleransi dan Radikalisme di Kalangan Perempuan: Riset Lima Wilayah di Bogor, Depok, Solo Raya, Malang, dan Sumenep. Jakarta: Wahid Foundation.

Ezrow, L. (2007). The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 182–192. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00503.x.

Hartley, J., Sancino, A., Bennister, M., & Resodihardjo, S. L. (2019). Leadership for Public Value: Political Astuteness As a Conceptual Link. Public Administration, 97(2), 239–249. https:// doi.org/10.1111/padm.12597.

Johnson, A. F., & Roberto, K. J. (2019). Elections and Selection: The Role of Political Ideology in Selection Decisions. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 14–27. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.05.003.

Kalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. 2019. Leading a Successful Transition to Democracy: A Qualitative Analysis of Political Leadership in Spain and Lithuania. Organization Studies, 41(6), 767-797. https://doi. org/10.1177/0170840618814555.

Kirchmayer, Z., & Fratričová, J. (2018). What Motivates Generation Z at Work? Insights Into Motivation Drivers of Business Students in Slovakia. Dalam Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2018: Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020, (September), 6019–6030.

Kurniawati, I. W. F., & Nurani, F. (2019). Konteks Kepemimpinan Indonesia Menurut Pancasila. Malang: Jurusan Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya.

Larreguy, H., & Marshall, J., (2017). The Effect of Education on Civic and Political Engagement in Nonconsolidated Democracies: Evidence from Nigeria. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(3): 387–401. doi:10.1162/ REST_a_00633.

Lionardo, A., Alfitri, A., Awang, M. M., Ahmad, A. R., & Khairuddin, K. F. (2019). Political Concern and Idealism as Mediators for Determining Political Leadership Styles. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(10), 219–230.

Lestari, D. (2019). Dinamika Politik Identitas di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 4(4). 12-16.

Lu, J. (2017). Ideological and Political Education in China’s Higher Education. East Asian Policy, 9(2), 78–91.

Mudzakkir, A., Ismail, I., Budi, M. I., Hafiz, M., & Aliah, S. D. (2018). Menghalau Ekstrimisme: Konsep & Strategi Mengatasi Ekstrimisme Kekerasan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Wahid Foundation.

Patmisari & Gafur, A. (2019). Pengaruh Gender Terhadap Kesadaran Politik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i1p207-214

Saifuddin. (2011). Radikalisme Islam di Kalangan Mahasiswa (Sebuah Metamorfosa Baru). Analisis, 11(1), 17–32.

Santoso, E. P. B. (2019). Pemilu dan Pilkada dalam Pusaran Politik Identitas. Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 2(2), 150–155.

Sarwono, J. (2011). Mengenal Path Analysis: Sejarah, Pengertian, dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, 11(2), 285-296.

Sembiring, T., Praptiningsih, W., & Primahendra, R. (2018). Revitalisasi Pancasila: Warisan Agung Pendiri Bangsa. Jakarta: Perkumpulan Amerta.

Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2019). Designing Institutional Platforms and Arenas for Interactive Political Leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463.

Sudaryono. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis (Path Analysis) Berdasarkan Urutasn penempatan Variabel dalam Penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 17(4), 391- 403.

Wong, K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using Smart PLS. The Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.

Wuttke, A. (2020). New Political Parties Through the Voters’ Eyes. West European Politics, 43(1), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402 382.2019.1603940

Xuetong, Y. (2016). Political Leadership and Power Redistribution. Journal of International Politics, 9(1), 1–26.

Yasmin, S., & Nurani, F. (2019). Kepemimpinan Pancasila untuk Masyarakat Multikultural di Indonesia. Malang: Jurusan Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v5i1p167-177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  

View My Stats