Email this article 
Pengaturan Klausul Pilihan Hukum dan Pilihan Forum dalam Perjanjian Asuransi Kapal di Indonesia
Abstract
The ship insurance agreement was prone to causing problems because the parties were in different jurisdictions, such as in the dispute over the PT. Purna Arthanugraha Insurance (PT. ASPAN) with PT. Indonesian Maritime Business Development (PT. Bumi Shipmanagement). The insurance policy agreement, in this case, was subject to and complied with English law, but the settlement of the case was filed in a court in Indonesia. This case became a legal problem in determining the choice of law arrangement and forum for resolving disputes. Based on these problems, this study aimed to analyze the regulation over the choice of law clause and the choice of forum in the ship insurance agreement. The approach used in this study was a case study approach and a statutory approach. The type of research used in this study was normative juridical, the data analysis technique used descriptive, interpretation, evaluation and argumentation techniques. The study results showed that the choice of law clause in the ship insurance agreement based on the agreement of the two parties referred to the applicable law in England, namely the Marine Insurance Act 1906. The setting of the forum choice clause in the ship insurance agreement was not regulated strictly and explicitly, so the dispute was submitted by one of the parties to the district court based on civil procedural law. Settlement of ship insurance agreement disputes through a lawsuit to the district court was not ideal because the district court's scope was limited to civil cases of a general nature.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. G. (2015). Pandangan Yuridis Conflict of Law dan Choice of Law dalam Kontrak Bisnis Internasional. Buletin Hukum Perbankan dan Kebanksentralan, 3(3), 1-13.
Fuady, M. (2000). Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Bandung: Aditya Bakti.
Gautama, S. (1977). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Cipta.
Gurses, O. (2015). Marine Insurance Law. New York: Routledge.
Harahap, A. H. B. (2009). Analisis Hukum terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional. Medan: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Hikmah, M. (2003). Sudah Saatnya Indonesia Memiliki Kodifikasi Hukum Perdata Internasional. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 33(2), 300-305.
Isnaeni, H. M. (2013). Perkembangan Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.
Lestarini, G. D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Akibat Perjanjian Kredit yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Offering Letter. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 304-314.
Martono, H. K., & Tjahyono, E. B. (2011). Asuransi Transportasi Darat-Laut-Udara. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Mаrzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitiаn Hukum. Jakarta: Kencаnа.
Memi, C. (2017). Penerapan Klausul Pilihan Yurisdiksi (Choice of Jurisdiction) dan Pilihan Hukum (Choice of Law) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Internasional (Studi Kasus: Perkara PT Syamrise Melawan PT Mega Suryamas). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 183-213.
Muhtarom, M. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum dalam Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. Jurnal Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 26(1), 48-56.
Njatrijani, R. (2020). Klaim Marine Hull and Machinery dalam Praktek Pertanggungan. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 3(1), 326-344.
Nova, M., Suhariningsih, & Sugiri, B. (2020). Perlindungаn Hukum Bаgi Debitur Penerimа Kredit Usаhа Rаkyаt yаng Wаnprestаsi kаrenа Overmаcht Pаdа Perjаnjiаn Kredit Bаnk. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 104-109.
Nurjannah, S. (2013). Harmonisasi Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak melalui Choice of Law. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan Al-Daulah, 2(2), 160-168.
Porta, R. L. (2000). Іnvеstоr Prоtеctіоn аnd Cоrpоrаtе gоvеrnаncе. Jurnаl of Fіnаncіаl Еcоnоmіcs, 58(2), 150-158.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undаng-Undаng Nоmоr 40 tаhun 2014 tеntаng Pеrаsurаnsіаn. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 337. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5618.
Rahmawati, I. A. Y., Yuliati, & Santoso, B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen atas Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi dalam Bisnis Pinjam-Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 202-212.
Risnain, M. (2013). Problematika Pilihan Hukum (Choice of Law) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Transaksi Bisnis Elektronik Internasional dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Islamic Business Law Review, 1(1), 211-222.
Rokan, M. K. (2013). Pilihan Hukum (Choice of Law) Berdasarkan Konvensi 1964 (Studi Kasus: Solbandera vs Blue Star dan Treller Nicholaas). Islamic Business Law Review, 1(1), 20-32.
Sepang, N. (2016). Kepastian Hukum Perjanjian Reasuransi menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1992. Lex Privatum, 4(5), 89-96.
Sutiyoso, B. (2012). Akibat Pemilihan Forum dalam Kontrak yang Memuat Klausula Arbitrase. Mimbar Hukum, 24(1), 160-174.
Syahrin. M. A. (2018). Penentuan Forum Yang Berwenang dan Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Transaksi Bisnis Internasional Menggunakan E-Commerce: Studi Kepastian Hukum dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 7(2), 207-228.
Scnitzer, S. (1964). Private International Law in European People’s Democraties. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 14(3), 1059-1060.
Syafran. (2012). Pilihan Hukum, Forum dan Domisili Suatu Kontrak dalam Transaksi Bisnis. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v7i1p77-86
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
