Integrating STEM into the Formal and Instructional Curriculum to Support Machine Construction Design

Dwi Agus Sudjimat, Maftuchin Romlie Romlie, Imam Sudjono Sudjono, Mahfudi Sahly Subandi


The design of machine construction is one of the subjects that often becomes a stumbling block for students of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program to graduate on time. Many factors cause it, including the weakness of students using STEM content in designing machine construction and the lack of contextual learning strategies for STEM-loaded courses with machine construction design tasks. This qualitative study aims to (1) identify the STEM content of the Scientific and Expertise Subject group, (2) describe the pattern of integrating STEM content in the formal and instructional curriculum, and (3) describe the learning pattern of the STEM content course. Research data were collected through document analysis, semi-open questionnaires, and FGD. The results showed (1) identified 15 scientific and skill courses containing STEM content that supported the work on machine construction design tasks, (2) integration of STEM-loaded courses in the formal curriculum was carried out by structuring their presentation before or at the same time as the presentation of the Mechanical Construction Design Course, being in the instructional curriculum is carried out by integrating learning experiences related to the design of machine construction in Lecture Event Unit, and (3) the learning pattern of courses containing STEM content should be carried out using a problem-based learning model where the problems are directly related to and or taken from machine construction design tasks.


STEM, formal curriculum, instructional, design, machine construction

Full Text:



Anggraini, FI, & Huzaifah, S. (2017). Implementation of STEM in science learning in junior high schools. Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Sriwijaya University, 1998, 722–731.

Barakos, L., Lujan, V., & Strang, C. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Catalyzing change amid the confusion. Mathematics (Stem), 1–28.

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Publications, 70(6), 5–9.

Chen, M. (2001). A Potential Limitation of Embedded-Teaching for Formal Learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 23(23), 276–281.

Concepts, C. (2011). Engineering Practices. December.

Ejiwale, JA (2013). Barriers To Successful Implementation of STEM Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2).

Firman, H. (2015). STEM-Based Science Education: Concepts, Development, and Role of Postgraduate Research. National Seminar on Science and PKLH Education, 151, 10–17.

Khoiriyah, N., Abdurrahman, A., & Wahyudi, I. (2018). Implementation of the STEM learning approach to improve the critical thinking skills of high school students on sound wave material. Journal of Physical Education Research and Studies, 5(2), 53–62.

Kurniawan, AAN, Sudjimat, DA, & Nurhadi, D. (2019). Characteristics of STEM in Mechanical Construction Designers by Mechanical Engineering Education Students at the State University of Malang. Journal of Technology, Vocational, And Teaching, 42(2), 96–106.

Miles, MB, & Huberman, AM (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Arizona: Arizona State University.

National STEM Education Center. 2014. STEM Education Network Manual. Bangkok: The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology.

Reeve, EM (2013). Implementing Science , Technology , Mathematics , and Engineering ( STEM ) Education in Thailand and in ASEAN A Report Prepared for : Prepared by : 1–22.

Roberts, A. (2012). A Justification for STEM Education. Technology and Engineering Teachere, May/June(June), 1–5.

Rustaman, NY (2016). Future Science Learning Based on STEM Education. In Proceedings of the National Seminar on Educational Biology (April Issue).

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.

Sulaiman, S. (2013). Modern Patterns of Organizational Curriculum Development. Scientific Journal of Didactics, 14(1), 60–73.

Wang, H., Moore, TJ, Roehrig, GH, & Park, MS (2011). STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1–13.

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & H, SK (2016). STEM: what, why, and how. In Proceedings of the UM Postgraduate Science Education National Seminar (Vol. 1, pp. 976–984).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya

Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya
E-ISSN 2477-0442 (online)

Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145, Building H5,  1st  Floor. 


 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.     





View My Stats