Systemic Risk Analysis Using Conditional Value at Risk (CoVaR) Model: Study of Conventional Banks in Indonesia

Rihana Sofie Nabella, Ghozali Maski, Setyo Tri Wahyudi


This study aims to measure systemic risk in conventional commercial banks in Indonesia with the Conditional Value at Risk (CoVaR) model developed by Adrian and Brunnermeier (2009). The financial crises of 1998 and 2008 have become valuable lessons for Indonesian banks to always maintain financial system stability because the impact caused by systemic risks is very large. Systemic risk is the possibility of instability due to contagion in some or all of the financial system. This study uses a sample of 6 conventional commercial banks in Indonesia from January 2012 to December 2018. The results obtained from this study is the systemic risk is not related to the size of banks. Each bank has a negative externality so that it can cause a bank rush and systemic impact.


Systemic Risk; Conditional Value at Risk; Conventional Banking

Full Text:



Acharya, Viral V.; Pedersen, Lasse H.; Philipon, Thomas dan Richardson, Mathew. 2010. Measuring Systemic Risk. Working paper The 17th Duvronik Economic Conference.

Adrian, T. & Brunnermeier. 2009. CoVaR. Princeton: Princeton University, Department of Economics, Bendheim Center for Finance.

Apriadi, I.; Sembel, R.; Santosa, P. W.; dan Firdaus, M. 2017. Kompetisi dan Stabilitas Perbankan: Suatu Pendekatan Analisis Panel Vector Autoregression. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Ayomi, Sri dan Hermanto, Bambang. 2013. Mengukur Risiko Sistemik dan Keterkaitan Finansial Perbankan di Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan.

Bank Indonesia. 2000. Sejarah Bank Indonesia. Jakarta: Unit Khusus Museum Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. 2018. Definisi dan Pentingnya SSK. Diakses 12 Mei 2019.

De Bandt, O.; Hartman P. & Peydro, JL. 2010. Systemic Risk in Banking an update. Oxford Habook of Banking, pp 634-664.

Derbali, A. & Hallara, S. 2015. Systemic Risk of European Financial Institutions: Estimation and Ranking by the Marginal Expected Shortfall. Research in International Business and Finance.

Dowd, K., & D. Blake. 2006. After VaR: The Theory, Estimation, and Insurance Application of Quantile-Based Risk Measures. The Journal of Risk and Insurance. 73 (2): 193-229.

Jorion, P. 2001. Value at Risk 2nd ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Kasmir. 2008. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Edisi Revisi 2008. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muharam, H. & Erwin. 2017. Measuring Systemic Risk of Banking in Indonesia: Conditional Value at Risk Model Application. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 6, 301-318.

Roengpitya, R & Rungcharoenkitkul, P. 2010. Measuring Systemic Risk and Financial Linkages in the Thai Banking System. Bangkok: Journal Bank of Thailand.

Zebua, Alfredo. 2011. Analisis Risiko Sistemik Perbankan Indonesia. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Zhou, C. 2010. Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Imprtance of Financial Institutions. International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 16, 4, 205-250.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN (Print) 2086-1575       ISSN (Online) 2502-7115

View My Stats


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.