Perilaku Dan Preferensi Membaca Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia

Monica Yusnita, Irwansyah Irwansyah

Abstract


Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat perilaku membaca dan apa yang mendorong preferensi mahasiswa Di Universitas Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode penelitian survei secara online. Subjek penelitian merupakan 75 mahasiswa sarjana dari beberapa program studi di Universitas Indonesia, dengan menggunakan teknik accidental sampling. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, Mahasiswa sarjana Universitas Indonesia melakukan kegiatan membacanya dengan membaca jenis bahan bacaan non-akademik, dan memilih membaca format digital terutama ketika membaca materi bacaan akademik. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bansal, G. (2011). E-Book Usage: Role of Environmental Consciousness, Personality and past Usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2011.11645544

Blackwood, C. (1991). Pleasure Reading by College Students Fact or Fiction? Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.

Cocozza, P. (2017). How eBooks lost their shine: “Kindles now look clunky and unhip.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/apr/27/how-ebooks-lost-their-shine-kindles-look-clunky-unhip-

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science+Business Media.

Dilevko, J., & Gottlieb, L. (2002). Print Sources in an Electronic Age: A Vital Part of the Research Process for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(6), 381. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/96850

Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2007). Does the medium affect the message? Human Systems Management, 26, 269–279.

Eyre, G. (2005). The development and practice of literacy: A voyage of discovery.

Gilbert, J., & Fister, B. (2011). Reading, risk, and reality: College students and reading for pleasure. College and Research Libraries, 72(5), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-148

Hafner, L. E., & Jolly, H. B. (1982). Teaching reading to children. Macmillan ; Collier Macmillan. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/7274515.html

Hancock, G. M., Schmidt-Daly, T. N., Fanfarelli, J., Wolfe, J. L., & Szalma, J. L. (2016). Is E-Reader Technology Killing or Kindling the Reading Experience? Ergonomics in Design, 24(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804615611269

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching.

Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to Increase Reading Ability : a guide to developmental and remedial methods. Longman.

Hornby, A. S., Cowie, A. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1974). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press.

Jolliffe, D. A., & Harl, A. (2008). Texts of our institutional lives: Studying the “reading transition” from high school to college: What are our students reading and why? College English, 70(6), 599–617.

Kim, H. J., & Kim, J. (2013). Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers’ reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2012.170

Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B., & Wilson, J. (2011). UC Libraries Academic E-book Usage Survey. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1890/120103

Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 583–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002

Lutz Klauda, S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing Relations of Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement among Struggling and Advanced Adolescent Readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2

Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Gardner, A. (2009). The Impact of Internet and Television Use on the Reading Habits and Practices of College Students. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND ADULT LITERACY, 52(7), 609–620.

Nganji, J. T. (2015). The Portable Document Format (PDF) accessibility practice of four journal publishers. Library & Information Science Research, 37(3), 254–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.02.002

Pardo, L. S. (2004). What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.3.5

Perrin, A. (2016). Book Reading 2016. PewResearchCentre, September, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1218-8

Philosophy, L., Igun, S. E., & Igun, S. E. (2007). DigitalCommons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln Study Habits of Postgraduate Students in Selected Nigerian Universities Universities. November.

Revelle, A., Messner, K., Shrimplin, A., & Hurst, S. (2012). Book lovers, technophiles, pragmatists, and printers: The social and demographic structure of user attitudes toward e-Books. College and Research Libraries, 73(5), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-288

Sebalj, D., Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2012). The Rise of. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(5), 463–472.

Shelburne, W. A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33(2–3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2009.10766234

Shrimplin, A. K., Revelle, A., Hurst, S., & Messner, K. (2011). Contradictions and consensus-clusters of opinions on E-books. College and Research Libraries, 72(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-108rl

Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017a). Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794

Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017b). Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961

Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. (2013). Reading and learning from screens versus print: a study in changing habits:Part 1 – reading long information rich texts. New Library World, 114(7–8), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-01-2013-0012

Sweet, A. P., Guthrie, J. T., & Ng, M. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. In Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 90, Issue 2, pp. 210–223). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.210

Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. In Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 8, Issue 6, pp. 323–332). Warwick & York. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075325

Tveit, Å. K., & Mangen, A. (2014). A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library and Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001

Wang, S., & Bai, X. (2016). University Students Awareness, Usage and Attitude Towards E-books: Experience from China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.001

Worden, A., & Collinson, T. (2011). Engaging staff and students with e-books in a university setting. In K. Price & V. Havergal (Eds.), E-books in Libraries: A Practical Guide (pp. 237–252). Facet. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.29085/9781856048002.019




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um008v4i22020p187-198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share




BIBLIOTIKA indexed by:

                                       

BIBLIOTIKA : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi
Prodi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Lisensi Creative Commons

BIBLIOTIKA : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
| Visitor Statistic