Prominence-Interpretation Theory: Membangun Kredibilitas Perusahaan di Media Digital

Putri Neva Lumeta, Irwansyah Irwansyah


In this time of information is searchable and reachable, companies need to be more aware of their reputation and credibility online.Users always have the tendency of recheck and double check. In other occasions, users are looking for certain or needed information online or to a specific sites or company’s assets. It can be company’s websites, social media, forum, or simply search engine. Using prominence-interpretation theory, companies can be aware of their digital or online credibility evaluated by users. The theory explains and very much can be expanded to cope with current situation of credibility evaluation through various platforms online.

Keyword: Prominence-interpretation theory, strategic communication, social media

Full Text:



(Jimmy) Xie, H., Miao, L., Kuo, P., & Lee, B. (2011). Consumers’ responses to ambivalent hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(1), 178-183.

Agnihotri, A. (2014). Mass-Media-based Corporate Reputation and Firms’ Market Valuation – Evidence from Emerging Markets. Corporate Reputation Review, 17(3), 206-218. doi:10.1057/crr.2014.10doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.04.008. Allagui, I., & Breslow, H. (2016). Social media for public relations: Lessons from four effective cases. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 20-30. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.12.001.

Bonsón, E., & Bednárová, M. (2013). Corporate LinkedIn practices of Eurozone companies. Information Review, 37(6), 969-984. doi:10.1108/oir-09-2012-0159.

Charest, F., Bouffard, J., & Zajmovic, E. (2016). Public relations and social media: Deliberate or creative strategic planning. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 530-538. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.008

Choi, W., & Stvilia, B. (2015). Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2399-2414. doi:10.1002/asi.23543.

Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., Van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., … Wielinga, B. (2008). The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. UserModeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(5), 455-496. doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3.

Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory. CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computer systems - CHI '03. doi:10.1145/765948.765951.

Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences - DUX '03. doi:10.1145/997078.997097.

George, J. F., Giordano, G., & Tilley, P. A. (2016). Website credibility and deceiver credibility: Expanding Prominence-Interpretation Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 83-93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.065.

George, J. F., Tilley, P., & Giordano, G. (2014). Sender credibility and deception detection. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.027.

Go, E., You, K. H., Jung, E., & Shim, H. (2016). Why do we use different types of websites and assign them different levels of credibility? Structural relations among users' motives, types of websites, information credibility, and trust in the press. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 231-239. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.046.

Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467-1484. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001.

Huang, Y. C., Wu, F., & Huang, Q. (2017). Does research on digital public relations indicate a paradigm shift? An analysis and critique of recent trends. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1364-1376. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.012.

Jensen, M. L. (2011). The Effects of Compensation Disclosure and Consensus on Perceptions of Product Reviews. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi:10.1109/hicss.2011.410.

Jensen, M. L., & Yetgin, E. (2017). Prominence and Interpretation of Conflict of Interest Disclosures. MIS Quarterly, 41(2), 629-643. doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.2.13.

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2014). Credibility of Social Network Sites for Political Information Among Politically Interested Internet Users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 957-974. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12084

Kakol, M., Nielek, R., & Wierzbicki, A. (2017). Understanding and predicting Web content credibility using the Content Credibility Corpus. Information Processing & Management, 53(5), 1043-1061. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2017.04.003

Kang, B., Höllerer, T., & O'Donovan, J. (2015). Believe it or Not? Analyzing Information Credibility in Microblogs. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015 - ASONAM '15. doi:10.1145/2808797.2809379.

Kim, D., Kim, J., & Nam, Y. (2013). How does industry use social networking sites? An analysis of corporate dialogic uses of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn by industry type. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2605-2614. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9910-9.

LaPoe, V. L., Carter Olson, C., & Eckert, S. (2017). “Linkedin Is My Office; Facebook My Living Room, Twitter the Neighborhood Bar”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 41(3), 185-206. doi:10.1177/0196859917707741.

Lee, N., Sha, B., Dozier, D., & Sargent, P. (2015). The role of new public relations practitioners as social media experts. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 411-413. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.002.

Machackova, H., & Smahel, D. (2018). The perceived importance of credibility cues for the assessment of the trustworthiness of information by visitors of health-related websites: The role of individual factors. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1534-1541. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.021

Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.

Nielsen, G. (2015). Perceived Credibility of Historical Information across Video Genres Among College Students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Pisano, S., Lepore, L., & Lamboglia, R. (2017). Corporate disclosure of human capital via LinkedIn and ownership structure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 102-127. doi:10.1108/jic-01-2016-0016

Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2012). Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise? Public Relations Review, 38(2), 303-312. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.001

Timothy Coombs, W., & Holladay, S. J. (2015). Public relations’ “Relationship Identity” in research: Enlightenment or illusion. Public Relations Review, 41(5), 689-695. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.008

Urban, G. L., Amyx, C., & Lorenzon, A. (2009). Trust: State of the Art, New Frontiers, and Research Potential. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(2), 179-190. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.03.001.

Valentini, C. (2015). Is using social media “good” for the public relations profession? A critical reflection. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 170-177. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.009.

Van Der Heide, B., & Lim, Y. (2015). On the Conditional Cueing of Credibility Heuristics. Communication Research, 43(5), 672-693. doi:10.1177/0093650214565915

Verčič, D., Verčič, A. T., & Sriramesh, K. (2015). Looking for digital in public relations. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 142-152. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.002.

Vorvoreanu, M. (2006). organization–public relationships: An experience-centered approach. Public Relations Review, 32(4), 395-401. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.09.007.

Xu, J., Le, K., Deitermann, A., & Montague, E. (2014). How different types of users develop trust in technology: A qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology. Applied Ergonomics, 45(6), 1495-1503. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012

Zerfass, A., & Schramm, D. M. (2014). Social Media Newsrooms in public relations: A conceptual framework and corporate practices in three countries. Public Relations Review, 40(1), 79-91. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.003

Zhang, L., Peng, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Zhu, J. J. (2014). Content or context: Which matters more in information processing on microblogging sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 242-249. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.031

Zide, J., Elman, B., & Shahani-Denning, C. (2014). LinkedIn and recruitment: how profiles differ across occupations. Employee Relations, 36(5), 583-604. doi:10.1108/er-07-2013-0086



  • There are currently no refbacks.

BIBLIOTIKA indexed by:


BIBLIOTIKA : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi
Prodi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Lisensi Creative Commons

BIBLIOTIKA : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
| Visitor Statistic