1.png)
Exploratory Factor Analysis for The Development of The 49-Item Children’s Reading Motivation Scale (Crms-49)
Abstract
Reading is crucial and serves as a fundamental
building block for learning. There are different instruments
available to assess the reading motivation of grade school children
but, caution and careful thought is required because the validity and
reliability of these measures cannot be generalized for use due to
cultural and contextual differences. The aim of the study was to
create a valid and reliable self-report measure of the reading
motivation of 280 intermediate-grade school pupils. The results of
the analysis confirmed that the 49-item Children’s Reading
Motivation Scale (CRMS) developed in this study accounted for
28.4% of the variance with three factors such as children's reading
self-efficacy, parental autonomy-supportive reading practices, and
children's reading and behavioral problems. The Cronbach’s α of
the tool was between 0.793 to 0.864 among the three factors
identified. The measure obtained good construct validity and will
prove a useful tool to help Filipino teachers determine the
intermediate graders’ motivation to read through their self-efficacy
in reading, support practices of their parents in reading, and their
reading and behavioral problems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational
psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of
adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107, 238–246.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Becker, Michael; McElvany, Nele; Kortenbruck, Marthe Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation
as Predictors of Reading Literacy: A Longitudinal Study Journal of Educational Psychology,
v102 n4 p773-785 Nov 2010
Biancarose, G., & Snow, C. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and
high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington DC:
Alliance for Excellent Education.
http://www.all4ed.org/publications/ReadingNext/index.html
Brooks, G., Flanagan, N., Henkhuzens, Z., & Hutchison, D. (1999). What Works for Slow Readers?
Berkshire: NFER.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The Reading Crisis: Why Poor Children Fall
Behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading
motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39, 1–67.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.140048
Deci, E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the
self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dziuban, C. D., and Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor
analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol. Bull. 81, 358–361. DOI: 10.1037/h0036316
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press, 198 Madison
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4314.
Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction
promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4),
–212.
Greene, R. W. (2017, August 15). Raising human beings: Creating a collaborative partnership
with your child. New York, NY: Scribner.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., and Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for
determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 6, 53–60.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., and Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for
determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 6, 53–60.
Adelman & Taylor (2000) Moving Prevention From the Fringes Into the Fabric of School
Improvement, Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11:1, 7-
, DOI: 10.1207/s1532768Xjepc1101_03
Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1995). The Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS): A new tool for
measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 470-
Howard, Matt. (2015). A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Decisions and Overview of
Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? International Journal of
Human-Computer Interaction. 32. 150914142834000. 10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664.
Luz, J. (2007, June 7). Literary and Literacy. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from Philippine Center for
Investigative Journalism: http://pcij.org/stories/a-nationof-nonreaders/
Miñoza Manilyn Vegare and Montero, Marites Atilano. (2019). READING COMPREHENSION
LEVEL AMONG INTERMEDIATE LEARNERS. Sci.Int.(Lahore),31(3),561-568, 2019
ISSN 1013-5316; CODEN: SINTE 8
O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using
parallel analysis and Veliger's MAP test. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 32,
–402. DOI: 10.3758/bf03200807
Revelle, W. (2019). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research.
[R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych.
Rimando, P. (2014, August 23). News. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from Manila Standard:
http://www.manilastandard.net/news/- provinces/155621/9-of-top-10-illiterate-
barangaysfound-in-mindanao.html
R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1)
[Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from
MRAN snapshot 2022-01-01).
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in
motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.
Washington D.C.: National Academy Press
Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading
motivation and reading competence? A cross‐lagged panel model for academic track and
nonacademic track students. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 19-36.
Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development:
Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education:
Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and
cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85-106.
The jamovi project (2022). Jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from
https://www.jamovi.org.
Westberg, L., McShane, S., & Smith, L. (2006). Verizon Life Span Literacy Matrix: Relevant
Outcomes, Measures and Research-based Practices and Strategies. Washington D.C.
The World Bank Annual Report 2022 Washington DC 20433 USA Retrieved
https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/annual-report
Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). School practices to build social-emotional
competence as the foundation of academic
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um043v6i1p1-16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.
