Apakah masih relevan teori akuntansi positif?

Meivida Medyastanti, Bambang Subroto

Abstract


Abstract
This study discusses the development, research, and critique of Accounting Positive Theory (APT). The five main steps of the scoping review methodology were utilized to conduct this study. There were 104 articles were collected from 1978 to 2022 through the use of a search engine and library search. After selecting and mapping of the relevant literature, 52 articles were further analyzed. This study concludes that APT is still relevant for current and future accounting research, despite its methodological, philosophical, and APT economy approach criticisms. Therefore, future research will contribute to solving the APT issue.

Abstrak
Penelitian ini mempelajari perkembangan, penelitian, dan kritik terhadap Teori Akuntansi Positif (TAP). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan scoping review dengan lima langkah utama untuk mengidentifikasi TAP. Sejumlah 104 artikel penelitian dikumpulkan terkait dengan TAP dari tahun 1978 sampai dengan 2022 dengan menggunakan mesin pencari internet dan penelitian kepustakaan. Setelah melalui tahapan pemilihan dan pemetaan literatur, terdapat 52 artikel yang dianalisis lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa TAP masih relevan sehingga dapat digunakan untuk praktik penelitian akuntansi saat ini dan masa depan, meskipun ada beberapa kritik terhadap TAP, dari segi metodologi, filosofi, dan pendekatan ekonomi TAP. Oleh karena itu, penelitian masa depan akan memberikan kontribusi untuk memecahkan masalah TAP.


Keywords


Positive Accounting Theory; Scoping Review; Critic; Accounting Research; Teori Akuntansi Positif; Scoping Review; Kritik; Riset Akuntansi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alayemi, S. A. & Abdul-Lateef, M. O. (2017). Accounting Numbers and Management’s Financial Reporting Incentives: Evidence from Positive Accounting Theory. Noble International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, 2(2), 50–53.

Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.

Avelé, D. (2014). Positive Accounting Theory: Theoretical and Critical Perspectives. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 6(4), 396-415. doi:10.1504/ijca.2014.067244.

Ball, R. (2013). Accounting Informs Investors and Earnings Management is Rife: Two Questionable Beliefs. Accounting Horizons, 27(4), 847–853. doi:10.2308/acch-10366.

Ball, R. & Foster, G. (1982). Corporate Financial Reporting: A Methodological Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 245-248. doi:10.2307/2674684.

Beaver, W. H. (1968). The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 93–95.

Boland, L. A. & Gordon, I. M. (1992). Criticizing Positive Accounting Theory. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(1), 142–170. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1992.tb00874.x.

Bwarleling, T. H. (2010). Pendekatan Teori Akuntansi Positif dalam Kasus Derivatif Pt. Indosat. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 3(2), 70–83. doi:10.30813/jab.v3i2.406.

Chambers, R. J. (1993). Positive Accounting Theory and the PA Cult. Abacus, 29(1), 1– 26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.1993.tb00419.x.

Christenson,C. (1983). The Methodology of Positive Accounting. The AccountingReview, 58(1), 1–22.

Christie, A. A. (1990). Aggregation of Test Statistics: An Evaluation of the Evidence on Contracting and Size Hypotheses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3), 15–36. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(90)90039-7.

Deegan, C. & Hallam, A. (1991). The Voluntary Presentation of Value Added Statements in Australia: A Political Cost Perspective. Accounting and Finance, 31(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-629X.1991.tb00250.x.

Duke, J. C. & Hunt, H. G. (1990). An Empirical Examination of Debt Covenant Restrictions and Accounting-Related Debt Proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 45–63. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(90)90041-2.

Dwitayanti, Y. & Wijaya, T. (2017). Penggunaan Perspektif Positive Accounting Theory terhadap Konservatisma Akuntansi di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, 1(2), 168–180. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3840848.

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical Research on Accounting Choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 255–307. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3.

Firmansyah,D. S.A.(2020). The Role ofCorporate Governance onEarningsQuality from Positive Accounting Theory Framework. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 808–820.

Gaffikin, M. (2007). Accounting Research and Theory: The Age of Neo-Empiricism. Australasian Accounting, Business, and Finance Journal, 1(1), 1–17. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v1i1.1.

Ghanbari, M., Manesh, M. Z., Khorasani, H., Hesam, M., & Nejad, H. (2016). PAT (Positive Accounting Theory) and Natural Science. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 10(2), 177–182.

Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J., & Holmes, S. (2010). Accounting Theory (7th ed). Milton: John Wiley & Sons.

Healy, P. M. (1985). The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 85–107. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1.

Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D. F., & Sloan, R. G. (1995). Annual Bonus Schemes and the Manipulation of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 29-74. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00376-G.

Holthausen,R. W. &Leftwich,R.W. (1983). The Economic Consequencesof Accounting Choice Implications of Costly Contracting and Monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 77–117. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1.

Howieson, B. (1996). Whither Financial Accounting Research: A Modern-Day Bo-Peep?. AustralianAccountingReview, 6(l),29–36.doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.1996.tb00005.x. Jantadej,P. &Kent,P. (1999). Corporate Environmental DisclosuresinResponse to Public Awareness of the Ok Tedi Copper Mine Disaster: A Legitimacy Theory Perspective.

Accounting Research Journal, 12(1), 72–88.

Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305– 360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.

Kabir, H. (2011). Positive Accounting Theory and Science. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, 3(2), 136-149. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1027382.

Kejriwal, A. (2022). Positive Accounting Theory: A Critical Evaluation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 4500–4509. doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6886.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). USA: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001.

Lakatos, I. (1970). History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 91-136.

Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.

Lazzem, S. & Jilani, F. (2018). The Impact of Leverage on Accrual-Based Earnings Management: The Case of Listed French Firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 350–358. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.103.

Lemon, A. J. & Cahan, S. F. (1997). Environmental Legislation and Environmental Disclosures: Some Evidence from New Zealand. Asian Review of Accounting, 5(1), 78–105. doi:10.1108/eb060683.

Lev, B. & Ohlson, J. A. (1982). Market-Based Empirical Research in Accounting: A Review, Interpretation, and Extension. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 249-322. doi:10.2307/2674685.

Lev, B. & Sunder, S. (1979). Methodological Issues in the Use of Financial Ratios. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1(3), 187–210. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(79)90007-7.

Lowe, E. A., Puxty, A. G., & Laughlin, R. C. (1983). Simple Theories for Complex Processes: Accounting Policy and the Market for Myopia. Journal of Accountingand Public Policy, 2(1), 19–42. doi:10.1016/0278-4254(83)90017-0.

Lys, T. (1984). Mandated Accounting Changes and Debt Covenants: The Case of Oil and Gas Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(1), 39–65. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(84)90019-3.

Mckee, A. J., Bell, T. B., & Boatsman, J. R. (1984). Management Preferences over Accounting Standards: A Replication and Additional Tests. The Accounting Review, 59(4), 647-659.

Milne, M. J. (2002). Positive Accounting Theory, Political Costs, and Social Disclosure Analyses: A Critical Look. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 369–395. doi:10.1006/cpac.2001.0509.

Mouck, T. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory as a Lakatosian Research Programme. Accounting and Business Research, 20(79), 231–239. doi:10.1080/00014788.1990.9728881.

Nasution,S. T. A.,Putri,R.F.,Muda,I.,&Ginting,S. (2020). Positive Accounting Theory: Theoretical Perspectives on Accounting Policy Choice. Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science (UNICEES 2018), 1128–1133. doi:10.5220/0009506011281133.

Nurmanto, F. D. (2018). Masihkah Hipotesis Akuntansi Positif Bisa Menjelaskan Manajemen Laba?. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing, & Informasi, 18(2), 115–134. doi:10.25105/mraai.v18i2.2574.

Osifo, I. U. O. & Fasua, H. K. (2017). Social and Environmental Disclosures and Holistic Growth in the Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) View. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(6), 1–8. doi:10.9790/487x-1906030108.

Priambodo, M. S. & Purwanto, A. (2015). Analisis Faktor–Faktor yang Mempengaruh Tingkat Konservatisme Perusahaan–Perusahaan di Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4(4), 268–277.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The Propensity Interpretation of Probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10(37), 25-42. doi:10.1093/bjps/X.37.25.

Santoso, M. R. & Sebayang, M. M. (2017). A Glimpse of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT). Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 3(2), 70–77.

Saragih, S. L., Marpaung, S. H., Muda, I., & Marbun, S. R. (2021). Approaches and Criticisms of Positive Accounting Theory and its Economic Consequences. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(4), 198–200.

Sari, W. P. (2020). The Effect of Financial Distress and Growth Opportunities on Accounting Conservatism with Litigation Risk as Moderated Variables in Manufacturing Companies Listed on BEI. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 588–597. doi:10.33258/birci.v3i1.812.

Setyorini, C. T. & Ishak, Z. (2012). Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure: A Positive Accounting Theory View Point. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 152–164.

Silva, A. S., Sancovschi, M., & Santos, A. (2017). The Opportunistic Approach of the Positive AccountingTheory Failsto Explaina Case Study: AnAnomalousSituation?. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-41. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3077349.

Srivastava, J. & Baag, P. K. (2020). Positive Accounting Theory and Agency Costs: A Critical Perspective. AIMS International Journal of Management, 14(2), 101-113. doi:10.26573/2020.14.2.3.

Sterling, R. R. (1990). Positive Accounting: An Assessment. Abacus, 26(2), 97–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.1990.tb00249.x.

Sugiarto, H. V. S. & Fachrurrozie. (2018). The Determinant of Accounting Conservatism on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(1), 1–9. doi:10.15294/aaj.v7i1.20433.

Sulastri, S. & Anna, Y. D. (2018). Pengaruh Financial Distress dan Leverage terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Akuisisi: Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(1), 59–69. doi:10.24127/akuisisi.v14i1.251.

Susanto, I. R. & Permatasari, I. (2019). Do High Leverage Motivate Managers to Manage Earnings ? Evidence of Debt Covenant Hypothesis in Indonesia Public Firms. 34th IBIMA Conference, 10287–10296.

Suwaldiman, S. (2003). Critique to the Logic and the Normative Senses of Positive Accounting Theory. Sinergi, 6(1), 47–53. doi:10.20885/sinergi.vol6.iss1.art4.

Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt-Covenant Violations and Managers’ Accounting Responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281–308. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2.

Takhtaei, N., Ojaghi, M. A., & Esfandabadi, S. H. S. (2013). Effect of Financial Leverage andInvestment Diversificationon Income-Increasing EarningsManagement.Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(6), 836–844. doi:10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.16.06.11840.

Tinker, A. M., Merino, B. D., & Neimark, M. D. (1982). The Normative Origins of Positive Theories: Ideology and Accounting Thought. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 7(2), 167–200. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(82)90019-8.

Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 53(I), 112–134.

Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1979). The Demand for and Supply of Accounting Theories: The Market for Excuses. The Accounting Review, 54(2), 273–305.

Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). A Positive Accounting Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Watts, R. L. & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156.

Whitley, R. D. (1988). The Possibility and Utility of Positive Accounting Theory. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 13(6), 631–645. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(88)90037-2.

Whittington, G. (1987). Positive Accounting: A Review Article. Accounting and Business Research, 17(68), 327–336. doi:10.1080/00014788.1987.9729816.

Williams, P. F. (1989). The Logic of Positive Accounting Research. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 14(5–6), 455–468. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(89)90011-1.

Zmijewski, M. E. & Hagerman, R. L. (1981). An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 129–149. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(81)90010-0.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um004v9i12022p148

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual is indexed by:

View JAA Stats
Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License