The Influence of Industrial Specialization Auditor on Audit Report Lag

Angelia Monique, Iman Harymawan

Abstract


This study aimed at analyzing the impact of Industrial specialization auditor on audit report lag and how the related party transaction affects the relationship between Industrial specialization auditor and audit report lag. This study used 1,897 observations from 353 different firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2017. Industrial specialization auditor was measured using market share based on total assets. This study used an Ordinary Least Square Regression analysis model. This study found that firms audited by the industrial specialization auditors had shorter audit report lag. This study also found that firms with high disclosure of the related party transactions had shorter audit report lag and those audited by the industrial specialization auditors belonging to the related party transactions did not extend (shorten) the audit report lag. These results indicate that firms audited by the industrial specialization auditors influenced the audit report lag; firms with high disclosure of the related party transactions influenced the audit report lag; and firms audited by the industrial specialization auditors belonging to high related party transactions did not influence the audit report lag. The implication of this study can be used by the firm management as a consideration in selecting the auditors.

Keywords


Audit Delay; Audit Report Lag; Industrial specialization auditor; Related Party Transactions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., & Stefaniak, C. (2014). The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness. Advances in Accounting, 30(2), pp. 283–297.

Al Daoud, K. A., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Lode, N. A. (2014). The timeliness of financial reporting among jordanian companies: Do company and board characteristics, and audit opinion matter?. Asian Social Science, 10(13), pp. 191–201. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n13p191

Al Daoud, K. A., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Lode, N. A. (2015). The impact of internal corporate governance on the timeliness of financial reports of jordanian firms: Evidence using audit and management report lags. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), pp. 430–442.

Baatwah, S. R., Salleh, Z., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Audit committee financial expertise and financial reporting timeliness in emerging market : Does audit committee chair matter ? Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 10(4), pp. 63–85.

Dao, M., & Pham, T. (2014). Audit tenure, auditor specialization and audit report lag. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), pp. 490–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2013-0906

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), pp. 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Fang, J., Lobo, G. J., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Auditing related party transactions: Evidence from audit opinions and restatements. Auditing, 37(2), pp. 73–106.

Fisman, R., & Wang, Y. (2010). Trading favors within chinese business groups. American Economic Review, 100(2), pp. 429–433.

Ge, W., Drury, D. H., Fortin, S., Liu, F., & Tsang, D. (2010). Value relevance of disclosed related party transactions. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), pp. 134–141.

Habib, A., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and the audit report lag. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(1), pp. 32–44.

Habib, A., Jiang, H., & Zhou, D. (2015). Related-party transactions and audit fees: Evidence from China, 14(1), pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2448088

Harymawan, I. (2018). Why do firms appoint former military personnel as directors? Evidence of loan interest rate in military connected firms in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), pp. 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2016-0086

Harymawan, I., & Nowland, J. (2016). Politival connections and earnings quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), pp. 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2016-0056

Hashim, F., Hashim, F., & Jambari, A. R. (2013). Relationship between corporate attributes and timeliness in corporate reporting: Malaysian evidence. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 64(2), pp. 115–119.

Hashim, B. U. J., & Rahman, A. R. B. (2012). Internal corporate governance mechanisms and audit report lag: A study of Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 8(3), pp. 48–63.

Hassan, Y. M. (2016). Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Palestine. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(1), pp. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2013-0024

Hosseinzadeh, G., Kangarlouei, S. J., & Motavassel, M. (2014). Firms characteristic and firms disclosure quality in firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 3(1).

Huang, L., Endrawes, M., & Hellmann, A. (2015). An experimental examination of the effect of client size and auditors’ industry specialization on time pressure in Australia. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(4), pp. 398–408. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c3p7

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets ? An analysis of. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), pp. 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00229

Khlif, H., & Samaha, K. (2014). Internal control quality, Egyptian standards on auditing and external audit delays: Evidence from the Egyptian stock exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 18(2), pp. 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12018

Nor, M. N., Shafie, R., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2010). Corporate governance and audit report lag in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 6(2), pp. 57–84.

Nor, H. M., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2017). The moderating effects of independent directors’ human capital on the relationship between related party transactions and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 51. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2017-51-04

Rusmin, R., & Evans, J. (2017). Audit quality and audit report lag: Case of Indonesian listed companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(2), pp. 191–210. http://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2015-0062

Ryngaert, M., & Thomas, S. (2012). Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: Ex ante versus Ex post RPTs. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), pp. 845–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00437.x

Sharma, D. S., Tanyi, P. N., & Litt, B. A. (2017). Costs of mandatory periodic audit partner rotation: Evidence from audit fees and audit timeliness. Auditing, 36(1), pp. 129–149. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51515

Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Van der Zahn, J. L. W. M. (2014). Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), pp. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12033

Whitworth, J. D., & Lambert, T. A. (2014). Office-level characteristics of the big 4 and audit report timeliness. Auditing, 33(3), pp. 129–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50697




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v6i2.16888

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2022 Iman Harymawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

          

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.