Local Government Performance Accountability:  Do Internal Control, Public Monitoring, and E-government Affect?

Marcellina Widiyastuti; Y Anni Aryani; Doddy Setiawan; Jaka Winarna

doi:10.17977/jabe.v10i2.53991

Local Government Performance Accountability: Do Internal Control, Public Monitoring, and E-government Affect?

Marcellina Widiyastuti, Y Anni Aryani, Doddy Setiawan, Jaka Winarna

Abstract

The government is required to work well to ensure accountability for funds from the public. To support government performance accountability, internal control, public monitoring, and the use of technology through e-government are needed. This research aims to determine the effect of internal control, public monitoring, and e-government on local government performance accountability. This research uses secondary data obtained from the Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform, the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency, the Supreme Audit Agency, and Statistics Indonesia. All district/city governments in Indonesia in 2021 and 2022 are the population in this research with a total sample of 693 observations. Multiple linear regression as an analysis tool using E-views 12. The results show that local government performance accountability is positively influenced by internal control, public monitoring, and e-government. This research is for local governments as input and consideration to further strengthen the internal control system so that it is not limited to formality, improve understanding and implementation of integrated SPIP, and improve the quality and infrastructure of e-government. In addition, the results of this research serve as an evaluation for the public to participate more and monitor the performance of local governments so that the accountability of local government performance increases.

Keywords

Internal control; public monitoring; e-government; local government performance accountability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). 2024. Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Instansi. https://www.kpk. go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-instansi

Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP). (2023). Laporan Kinerja BPKP Tahun 2022. Retrieved from https://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/pusat/files/ 2023/Laporan%20Kinerja% 20BPKP%20Tahun%202022_final.pdf.

Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) Regulation No. 5 of 2021. Penilaian Maturitas Penyelenggaraan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah Terintegrasi pada Kementerian/ Lembaga/ Pemerintah Daerah. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/242786/peraturan-bpkp-no-5-tahun-2021.

Government Regulation No. 8 of 2006. Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/49029/pp-no-8-tahun-2006

Government Regulation No. 12 of 2017. Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/5832/pp-no-12-tahun-2017.

Gumelar, A., Supriatna, I., & Kusumastuti, E. D. (2021). Pengaruh Maturitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah Terhadap Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi Kasus Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Purwakarta). Indonesian Accounting Research Journal, 2(1), pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/ 10.35313/iarj.v2i1.3386

Habibah, A. F. (2021). Sri Mulyani: Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Belum Efisien dan Efektif. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2389197/sri-mulyani-pengelolaan-keuangan-daerah-belum-efisien-dan-efektif

Halim, A., & Abdullah, S. (2006). Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintahan Daerah (Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan Akuntansi). Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 2(1), pp. 53–64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273257684

Hasibuan, D. H., & Khomsiyah. (2020). The Effect of Legislative Oversight, Budget Transparency, and Internal Auditor Quality on Local Government Performance with Total Asset Moderation: A Case Study in Indonesia. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 24(6), pp. 1–13.

Hendrianto, Alamsyah, S., & Indrawan, A. (2022). Implementasi Pelaporan Akuntansi Sektor Publik dan Pengendalian Intern terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja pada Instansi Pemerintah. BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management, and Accounting Journal, 19(2), pp. 184–195. https://doi.org/10.30651/ blc.v19i2.13522

Irwansyah, Hidayati, T., & Hudayah, S. (2022). The Effect of E-Government on Local Government Performance Accountability in Indonesia. International Journal of Ebusiness and Egovernment Studies, 14(2), pp. 126–147. https://doi.org/10.34109/ijebeg

Jauhari, H., & Dewata, E. (2019). The Determinant Factors of Performance of Provincial Governments in Indonesia. JABE (Journal of Accounting and Business Education), 3(2), pp. 170–179. https://doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v3i2.5591

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305–360. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kahar, A., Furqan, A. C., & Tenripada, T. (2023). The Effect of Budget, Audit and Government Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Regional Governments. Economy of Regions, 19(1), pp. 289–298. https://doi.org/10.17059/Ekon.Reg.2023-1-22

Kencana, M. R. B. (2023). Jalan Rusak Berat di Lampung sepanjang 2.745 Km, Kewenangan Pemerintah Pusat Sebenarnya Cuma 22 Km. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/5278618/jalan-rusak-berat-di-lampung-sepanjang-2745-km-kewenangan-pemerintah-pusat-sebenarnya-cuma-22-km?page=2

Kurnia, S., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Determinants and Performance Accountability: a Case Study of the Regional Government. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 5(2 Special Issue), pp. 221–227. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i2sip9

Lestari, K., Rahayu, S., & Yudi. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Tingkat Kekayaan Daerah, Tingkat Ketergantungan Daerah, Belanja Modal dan Temuan Audit BPK Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jambi). JAKU (Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Unja), 4(2), pp. 53–67. https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v4i2.7796

Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi.

Melani, A. (2023). Kondisi Jalan di Lampung yang Rusak Sempat Viral, Warga Ingin Jalan di Daerahnya Diperbaiki. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/5275846/kondisi-jalan-di-lampung-yang-rusak-sempat-viral-warga-ingin-jalan-di-daerahnya-diperbaiki?page=2

Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB Ministry). (2023). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian PANRB Tahun 2022. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/publikasi/ unduh-dokumen-2/akuntabilitas-kinerja/laporan-kinerja/file/6782-laporan-kinerja-lakip-2022.

Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB) Regulation No. 59 of 2020. Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/ Details/150381/permen-pan-rb-no-59-tahun-2020.

Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB) Regulation No. 88 of 2021. Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/ Details/202221/permen-pan-rb-no-88-tahun-2021

Muhtar, Arifin, T., & Sutaryo. (2021). Performance Accountability in Indonesian Local Governments: Does Monitoring Really Work? International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), pp. 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4329.2021

Noordiatmoko, D., Anggriawan, T., & Saputra, A. E. (2023). The Key Factors to Improve the Government Performance Management System: a Lesson from Indonesia. Public Administration Issues, 6, pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-6-122-136

Nor, W., Hudaya, M., Novriyandana, R., Lesmanawati, D., & Yuliastina, M. (2018). Human Development Index and Audit Opinion. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 6(1), pp. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v6i1.4326

Nugraheni, E., & Adi, P. H. (2020). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah: Studi Meta-Analisis. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 20(1), pp. 19–42. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v20i1.4398

Nugraheny D. E, & Farisa, F. C. (2023). Geramnya Jokowi, Anggaran Stunting Rp 10 Miliar, Dipakai Rapat dan Perjalanan Dinas Rp 6 M. https://kmp.im/app6https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/06/14/ 16171521/geramnya-jokowi-anggaran-stunting-rp-10-miliar-dipakai-rapat-dan-perjalanan

Nurina, & Yahya, M. R. (2016). Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Anggaran Belanja Modal dan Ketaatan pada Peraturan Perundangan terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 1(2), pp. 128–142.

Pahlevi, A. R., & Setiawan, D. (2017). Apakah Karakteristik Kepala Daerah Berdampak terhadap Kinerja Pemerintahan? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 8(3), pp. 571–582. https://doi.org/ 10.18202/jamal. 2017.12.7074

Pranesti, A. (2022). Kajian Sistem Penganggaran Partisipatif Pemerintah Daerah Melalui E-Government Sebagai Wujud Good Governance. AKUNTANSI 45, 3(1), pp. 144–152. https://doi.org/10.30640/ akuntansi45.v3i1.699

Presidential Regulation No. 29 of 2014. Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/41515/perpres-no-29-tahun-2014

Presidential Regulation No. 18 of 2020. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2020-2024. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/131386/perpres-no-18-tahun-2020.

Pribadi, U. (2021). Bureaucratic Reform, Public Service Performance, and Citizens’ Satisfaction: The Case of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration, 20(2), pp. 312–326. https://doi.org/ 10.13165/VPA-21-20-2-13

Purbasari, H., & Bawono, A. D. B. (2017). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal, Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 2(2), pp. 102–108. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v2i2.4884

Rahmasari, A., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Maturity of Internal Control System, the Capability of Internal Auditors, and Performance Accountability in Local Governments. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 8(2), pp. 159–176. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v8i2.830

Safitri, R. H., Kalsum, U., & Pratiwi, T. S. (2022). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah, dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah di Sumatera Selatan. Owner, 7(1), pp. 219–230. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i1.1267

Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and Institutional Challenges on Local Governments Performance Accountability System Reform in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 13(4), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659

Setiawan, D., Winarna, J., & Nugroho, Y. P. (2022). Determinants of Local Government Accountability: Evidence from Central Java Province, Indonesia. Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021), 12(5), pp. 400–405. https://doi.org/ 10.2991/assehr.k.220204.061

Statistics Indonesia (BPS). (2023). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia 2022. Retrieved from https://www. bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/05/16/ef80bec78ab91cb5b703b943/indeks-pembangunan-manusia-2022.html.

Sudirman, F. A., & Saidin, S. (2022). Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (E-Government) dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Reviu Literatur Sistematis. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(1), pp. 44–58. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i1.269

Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). (2023). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2023. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/ihps.

Sutopo, B., Wulandari, T. R., Adiati, A. K., & Saputra, D. A. (2017). E-Government, Audit Opinion, and Performance of Local Government Administration in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(4), pp. 6–22. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i4.2

Telabah, I. W. S., Hermanto, & Handajani, L. (2018). Implementation of Performance Accountability System for Government Institution (SAKIP): Determinants and Consequence in Local Government. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), pp. 87–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/ ibarj.v2i2.36

Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H., & Martani, D. (2017). Good governance and the impact of government spending on performance of local government in Indonesia. Int. J. Public Sector Performance Management, 3(1), pp. 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082503

Widagdo, A. K., & Munir, Moh. B. (2017). Profil Kepala Daerah dan Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 20(2), pp. 303-330. https://doi.org/10.24914/ jeb.v20i2.747

Winarna, J., Muhtar, M., Sutaryo, S., & Amidjaya, P. G. (2021). Government Internal Control System and Local Government Administration Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Local Governments. Public Finance Quarterly, 66(2), pp. 88–107. https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_S_2_5

Wulandari, I., & Bandi. (2015). Pengaruh E-Government, Kapabilitas APIP dan Persentasi Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut terhadap Opini Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(2), pp. 148–157. https://doi.org/10.20961/jab.v15i2.184

Yudanto, L. A., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2020). Perception of civil servant’s on APIP capability as moderating variable on the relationship between the implementation of SPIP and SAKIP (Study on Salatiga City Government). The Indonesian Accounting Review, 10(2), pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.14414/ tiar.v10i2.2140

Zamzami, F., & Rakhman, F. (2023). Determinants of Local Government Financial Performance in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(5), pp. 332–347. https://doi.org/ 10.36941/ ajis-2023-0148

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jabe.v10i2.53991