Exploring the Acceptance of Sharia Peer-to-Peer Lending in Supporting MSME Financial Resilience and Protection from Illegal Loans

Nurul Aisah, Ilham Karin Rizkiawan, Sisca Dian Rahmawati, Aulia Galuh Ani Sekar Arum, Yunita Sari

Abstract


Sharia Peer to Peer Lending (P2P) has the potential to be a fairer and usury-free financing alternative for MSMEs, but still has a much smaller market share compared to conventional P2P Lending even though Indonesia is the country with the largest Muslim population in the world. This study is aimed to identify factors influencing MSMEs' use of Sharia-compliant peer-to-peer lending, which can be an alternative financing option for MSMEs to support financial resilience and protect against illegal loans. The data analysis methods used in this study are Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Robustness Check with the UTAUT 2 model and a mixed methods research approach. The research sample consisted of 165 respondents who met the criteria, namely MSMEs with knowledge, interest, or experience in using Sharia-compliant peer-to-peer lending. The results of the study indicate that Effort Expectancy, Hedonic Motivation, Performance Expectancy, Price Value, and Trust have a significant positive effect on Behavioral Intention. Perceived Risk has a significant negative effect on Behavioral Intention, while Social Influence has no effect on Behavioral Intention. Financing from Sharia P2P Lending helps maintain business continuity, especially when there is a decline in sales or sudden capital needs

Keywords


Financial Resilience; Fintech; MSMEs; Sharia P2P Lending; UTAUT2

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aisah, N., Rizkiawan, I. K., & Sholeha, A. (2024). Atensi masyarakat dalam menggunakan peer to peer lending syariah: Mendorong inklusi keuangan syariah. Journal of Management and Digital Business, 4(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53088/jmdb.v4i1.928

Aisah, N., Utomo, C. W., & Setyawan, R. (2024). Contribution of Green Banking to Performance Based on Integrated Sharia Maqasid: The Moderation Role of Islamic Social Reporting. E3S Web of Conferences, 571. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457103006

Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 55, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.007

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002

Al-Hashfi, R. U., & Zusryn, A. S. (2019). Exploring Islamic Peer-To-Peer Lending for the Unbankable. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 2(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.20473/aijief.v2i2.20648

Angelina, Kurniadi, E., Hendityasari, G. G., & Mariani, M. (2021). Analysis Factors Affecting Lenders Intention In P2p Lending Platform Using Utaut2 Model. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 3527–3537. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1628

Asgary, A., Ozdemir, A. I., & Özyürek, H. (2020). Small and Medium Enterprises and Global Risks: Evidence from Manufacturing SMEs in Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00247-0

Awaludin, A., Rusito, R., & Supriyo, D. A. (2023). Preventing Illegal Online Loan Crimes. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_21

Bobihu, S., Isnawaty Pakaya, S., & Ishak, I. M. (2025). YUME : Journal of Management Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Masyarakat Kota Gorontalo Mengggunakan Layanan Finansial Teknologi Peer to Peer Lending. YUME : Journal of Management, 8(1), 400–409.

Chang, C. M., Liu, L. W., Huang, H. C., & Hsieh, H. H. (2019). Factors influencing Online Hotel Booking: Extending UTAUT2 with age, gender, and experience as moderators. Information (Switzerland), 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/info10090281

Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15(4), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z

Chowdhury, S. R. (2011). Impact of global crisis on small and medium enterprises. Global Business Review, 12(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091101200303

Cowling, M., Liu, W., & Ledger, A. (2012). Small business financing in the UK before and during the current financial crisis. International Small Business Journal, 30(7), 778–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611435516

Darmansyah, Fianto, B. A., Hendratmi, A., & Aziz, P. F. (2020). Factors determining behavioral intentions to use Islamic financial technology: Three competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0252

Giovanis, A., Assimakopoulos, C., & Sarmaniotis, C. (2019). Adoption of mobile self-service retail banking technologies: The role of technology, social, channel and personal factors. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 47(9), 894–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-05-2018-0089

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Handayani, O., Sulistiyono, A., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2021). The Urgency of Regulating Fintech Peer to Peer Lending Sharia in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy (ICEEP 2021), 583(Iceep 2021), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211014.036

Hasibuan, H. T. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Menggunakan Layanan Financial Technology Peer To Peer Lending Syariah. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(5), 1201. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i05.p10

Hidajat, T. (2020). Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028

Ichwan, & Kasri, R. A. (2019). Why Are Youth Intent on Investing Through Peer To Peer Lending? Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1157

Idrees, M. A., & Ullah, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of FinTech adoption among Islamic and conventional banking users with moderating effect of education level: A UTAUT2 perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100343

Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., Molinillo, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019). A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49(March), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.016

Kapser, S., & Abdelrahman, M. (2020). Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in Germany – Extending UTAUT2 with risk perceptions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111(June 2019), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.016

Kazemi, H., Miller, D., Mohan, A., Griffith, Z., Jin, Y., Kwiatkowski, J., Tran, L., & Crawford, M. (2015). 350mW G-band medium power amplifier fabricated through a new method of 3D-copper additive manufacturing. 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, IMS 2015, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2015.7167037

KemenkopUKM. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Kementerian KUKM.

Lara-Rubio, J., Villarejo-Ramos, A. F., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2020). Explanatory and predictive model of the adoption of P2P payment systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 40(6), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1706637

Leicht, T., Chtourou, A., & Ben Youssef, K. (2018). Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.001

Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 50, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007

Marhadi, M., Fathoni, A. F., Setiawan, B., Pratiwi, D., Hayati, R., Boros, A., & Sudibyo, N. A. (2024). Continuance intention of Fintech Peer-to-Peer (P2P) financing Shariah: Moderation role of brand schematicity and digital financial literacy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100301

Marriott, H. R., & Williams, M. D. (2018). Exploring consumers perceived risk and trust for mobile shopping: A theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42(August 2017), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.017

Mbuyisa, B., & Leonard, A. (2016). The Role Of ICT Use In SMEs Towards Poverty Reduction: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of International Development, 168(10–13), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3258

Montazemi, A. R., & Saremi, H. Q. (2015). Factors affecting adoption of online banking: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Information and Management, 52(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.11.002

Morosan, C., & DeFranco, A. (2016). It’s about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers’ intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.11.003

Mudjahidin, Hidayat, A. A., & Aristio, A. P. (2021). Conceptual model of use behavior for peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.134

Nurfadilah, D., Nurhaida, D., & Samidi, S. (2022). The Default in Islamic Peer To Peer Lending: an Application of the General Strain Theory. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 8(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i2.1432

OJK. (2023). Statistic Fintech Lending Periode Mei 2023. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan; IKNB.

Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100027

Putri, P. A., & Rinaldi, K. (2023). The problems of Illegal Online Loans based on the Victim’s Perspective: A Case Study. International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics, 4(3), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v4i3.215

Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032

Rusadi, F. A. R. P., & Benuf, K. (2020). Fintech Peer to Peer Lending as a Financing Alternative for the Development MSMEs in Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 28(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v28i2.12865

Saripudin, S., Nadya, P. S., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Upaya Fintech Syariah Mendorong Akselerasi Pertumbuhan UMKM di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i1.1449

Shafi, M., Liu, J., & Ren, W. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized Enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100018

Sharma, A., Mohan, A., Johri, A., & Asif, M. (2024). Determinants of fintech adoption in agrarian economy: Study of UTAUT extension model in reference to developing economies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100273

Sianjaya, I. C., Hasan, T., & Susiawati, A. (2024). Legal impact and urgency of protection for users of illegal online loan services. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(4), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i4.229

Slade, E., Dwivedi, Y., Piercy, N., & Williams, M. (2015). Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860–873. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823

Sopanah, A., Rusdianti, I. S., & Sulistyan, R. B. (2025). Early Detection of Fraud with an Accounting System. JABE (Journal Of Accounting And Business Education), 9(3), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.17977/jabe.v9i3.53952

Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2013). Customer usage intention of mobile commerce in India: An empirical study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191311303385

Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014). Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Research, 24(3), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2012-0244

Wang, C., Zhang, W., Zhao, X., & Wang, J. (2019). Soft information in online peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from a leading platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36(December 2018), 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100873

Wu, J., Liu, L., & Huang, L. (2017). Consumer acceptance of mobile payment across time Antecedents and moderating role of diffusion stages. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(8), 1761–1776. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2016-0312

Yunus, U. (2019). A Comparison Peer to Peer Lending Platforms in Singapore and Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1235(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1235/1/012008




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jabe.v10i1.63189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Aisah, Ilham Karin Rizkiawan, Sisca Dian Rahmawati, Aulia Galuh Ani Sekar Arum, Yunita Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

          

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.