INDEKS KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP LAYANAN ADMINISTRASI JURUSAN

Sasi Maulina; Aulia Nur Firdausi; Arif Prastiawan; Fitria Yuliati Wiludjeng; Erika Mei Budiarti; Maulana Amirul Adha

doi:10.17977/um027v4i32021p257

INDEKS KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP LAYANAN ADMINISTRASI JURUSAN

Sasi Maulina, Aulia Nur Firdausi, Arif Prastiawan, Fitria Yuliati Wiludjeng, Erika Mei Budiarti, Maulana Amirul Adha

Abstract

Abstract: Student satisfaction with the services provided by higher education institutions is the main goal that must always be pursued. The purpose of this study is to determine the student satisfaction index to the department's administrative services. This study used a descriptive quantitative approach, with a survey method. The population in this study were students of the AP FIP UM Department with a total sample of 186 students. The instrument used is a closed questionnaire. The variable in this research is student satisfaction which is analyzed by descriptive satisfaction index. Based on the results of the analysis of the student satisfaction index on the department's administrative services, (1) in total it is in the very high satisfaction zone; (2) aspects of tangibles are in the zone of high satisfaction, while aspects of reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy are in the zone of very high satisfaction; and (3) Class of 2020 has the highest satisfaction index, followed by class of 2019, 2017 and the lowest is 2018.

Keywords: satisfaction index; administrative services; higher education

Abstrak: Kepuasan mahasiswa atas layanan yang diberikan oleh institusi peruguruan tinggi merupakan tujuan utama yang harus senantiasa diusahakan. Tujuan penelitian ini yakni mengetahui indeks kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap layanan administrasi jurusan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif, dengan metode survei. Populasi dalam penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa Jurusan AP FIP UM dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 186 mahasiswa. Instrumen yang digunakan yakni angket tertutup. Variabel dalam penelitian ini yakni kepuasan mahasiswa yang dianalisis dengan Indeks kepuasan secara deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis indeks kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap layanan administrasi Jurusan, (1) secara total masuk dalam zona kepuasan sangat tinggi; (2) aspek tangibles berada dalam zona kepuasan tinggi, sementara aspek reliability, responsiveness, assurance dan emphaty berada dalam zona kepuasan sangat tinggi; dan (3) Angkatan 2020 memiliki indeks kepuasan tertinggi, diikuti angkatan 2019, 2017 dan terendah yakni 2018.

Kata Kunci: indeks kepuasan; layanan administrasi; perguruan tinggi

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adha, M. A., Ariyanti, N. S., Mustiningsih, Maisyaroh, & Bafadal, I. (2020). Analysis of Success Factors Implementation of Computer-Based Management Information System in Higher Education. 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2020), 508(Icite), 80–85. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.217

Adityo, O. H., Sofianti, T. D., & Saraswati, T. (2015). Students ’ Satisfaction Index : A Case Study in SGU. International Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology, (November), 293–300.

Aitken, N. D. (2016). College Student Performance, Satisfaction and Retention. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1982.11780423

Al-Amri, A. S., Mathew, P., Zubairi, Y. Z., & Jani, R. (2020). Optimal Standards to Measure the Quality of Higher Education Institutions in Oman: Stakeholders’ Perception. SAGE Open, 10(3), 2158244020947440. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020947440

Allam, Z. (2020). Demystifying the Aspect of Quality in Higher Education: Insights From Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019899057. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899057

Ang, C.-S., Lee, K.-F., & Dipolog-Ubanan, G. F. (2019). Determinants of First-Year Student Identity and Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Quantitative Case Study. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019846689. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846689

Arifin, I., Maisyaroh, & Adha, M. A. (2020). Seri Penelitian Kuantitatif Karir Ideal Mahasiswa Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Ariyanti, N. S., Adha, M. A., Imron, A., Sobri, A. Y., & Bafadal, I. (2020). School Relations Strategy with the Community through the Utilization of Online Applications in the Digital Era. 1st International Conference On Information Technology And Education (ICITE 2020), 508(Icite), 93–97. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.219

Ariyanti, N. S., Adha, M. A., Wiyono, B. B., Timan, A., Burhanuddin, & Mustiningsih. (2021). The Effect of Situational Leadership of the Head of Administration, Emotional Quotient and Achievement Motivation on Employee Performance at State University of Malang. AIP Conference Proceedings 2339, 020165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044894

Bean, J. P., & Bradley, R. K. (2016). Untangling the Satisfaction-Performance Relationship for College Students. The Journal of Higher Education, 57(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778785

Budiarti, E. M. (2018). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan, Budaya Akademik, Dan Citra Lembaga Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 2(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v2i32018p169

Chandra, T., Ng, M., Chandra, S., & Priyono. (2018). The Effect of Service Quality on Student Satisfaction and Student Loyalty: An Empirical Study. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.12590

Chui, T. B., Ahmad, M. S. bin, Bassim, F. binti A., & Zaimi, N. binti A. (2016). Evaluation of Service Quality of Private Higher Education Using Service Improvement Matrix. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.417

Darmaji, Supriyanto, A., Timan, A., & Adha, M. A. (2020). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Sekolah di Satuan Pendidikan Dasar (Studi Kasus di SD Plus Al-Kautsar Malang). Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 5(2), 172–186.

Gregg, W. E. (2016). Several Factors Affecting Graduate Student Satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 43(6), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1972.11774977

Gumilar, R., & Prihatin, E. (2013). Kualitas Pelayanan Administrasi Akademik di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Se-Kota Bandung. Jurnal Aministrasi Pendidikan, 17(1), 115–126.

Gunawan, I. (2013). Statistika untuk Kependidikan Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak Yogyakarta.

Jiewanto, A., Laurens, C., & Nelloh, L. (2012). Influence of Service Quality, University Image, and Student Satisfaction toward WOM Intention: A Case Study on Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.155

Juharyanto, Bafadal, I., Arifin, I., Saputra, B. R., & Adha, M. A. (2020). The Use of Conventional Communication Technology as an Effective Principal Leadership Strategy in Strengthening the Role of Multi-Stakeholder’s Forum for School Quality Improvement. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 1963–1973. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.762773

Kingsley, P., & Sharon, T. (2014). Business and Academic Interests in the Maintenance of Standards in Online Higher Education. SAGE Open, 4(4), 2158244014564342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564342

Knox, W. E., Lindsay, P., & Kolb, M. N. (2016). Higher Education, College Characteristics, and Student Experiences. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1992.11778364

Morstain, B. R. (2016). An Analysis of Students’ Satisfaction with Their Academic Program. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1977.11780327

Muafi, & Siswanti, Y. (2007). Anteseden Ekuitas Merek Perguruan Tinggi: SEM dengan Pendekatan Two Step. Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia, 36(3), 27–34.

Ning, Y., & Chen, J. (2016). Improving residential satisfaction of university dormitories through post-occupancy evaluation in China: A socio-technical system approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(10), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101050

Nurcahyo, R., Apriliani, F., Muslim, E., & Wibowo, A. D. (2019). The Analysis of the Implementation of 5-S Principles Integrated With ISO 9001 Requirements at Higher Education Level. SAGE Open, 9(3), 2158244019870773. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019870773

Ravindran, S. D., & Kalpana, M. (2012). Student’s Expectation, Perception and Satisfaction towards the Management Educational Institutions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2(Af), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00102-5

Reza, M. I. H. (2016). Sustainability in Higher Education: Perspectives of Malaysian Higher Education System. SAGE Open, 6(3), 2158244016665890. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016665890

Syakur, A. (2018). Hubungan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa Ditinjau Dari Model Pembelajaran Di Akademi Farmasi Surabaya. Reformasi, 8(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v8i2.1091

Temizer, L., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2012). Implementation of Student Satisfaction Index Model in Higher Education Institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3802–3806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.150

Ubaidillah, E., Gunawan, I., Adha, M. A., Ariyanti, N. S., & Erviana, Y. (2020). Students Perception of Technology-Assisted Services and Readiness of Employee Digital Competencies in Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2020) Students, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201204.026

Wiyono, B. B. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Action Research) (Burhanuddin, ed.). Malang: FIP Universitas Negeri Malang.

Yirdaw, A. (2016). Quality of Education in Private Higher Institutions in Ethiopia: The Role of Governance. SAGE Open, 6(1), 2158244015624950. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015624950

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um027v4i32021p257