Pengaruh Supervisi Akademik dan Motivasi Kerja Guru terhadap  Kualitas Pembelajaran

Imamuddin Sa'id; Rasiman Rasiman; Soedjono Soedjono

Pengaruh Supervisi Akademik dan Motivasi Kerja Guru terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran

Imamuddin Sa'id, Rasiman Rasiman, Soedjono Soedjono

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the effect of academic supervision and teachers’ work motivation on the quality of learning in Sekolah Dasar Penggerak in Rembang Regency. The study employed a quantitative approach with a survey design. The population consisted of 107 teachers from six Sekolah Dasar Penggerak, selected using a total sampling technique. Data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed using simple linear regression and multiple linear regression after meeting the prerequisite assumption tests. The results indicated that academic supervision had a positive and significant effect on learning quality (β = 0.412; t = 6.149; p < 0.05). Teachers’ work motivation also had a positive and significant effect on learning quality (β = 0.563; t = 7.602; p < 0.05). Simultaneously, academic supervision and teachers’ work motivation significantly influenced learning quality (F = 141.328; p < 0.05) with an Adjusted R² value of 0.726, indicating that both variables contributed 72.6% to the variance in learning quality. These findings confirm that improving learning quality requires the integration of effective principal academic supervision and strengthened teachers’ work motivation to support learning transformation in Sekolah Dasar Penggerak
Keywords: academic supervision, teachers’ work motivation, learning quality

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh supervisi akademik dan motivasi kerja guru terhadap kualitas pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Penggerak Kabupaten Rembang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 107 guru dari enam Sekolah Dasar Penggerak dengan teknik total sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui angket tertutup skala Likert lima tingkat dan dianalisis menggunakan regresi linear sederhana serta regresi linear berganda setelah memenuhi uji prasyarat analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa supervisi akademik berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas pembelajaran (β = 0,412; t = 6,149; p < 0,05). Motivasi kerja guru juga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas pembelajaran (β = 0,563; t = 7,602; p < 0,05). Secara simultan, supervisi akademik dan motivasi kerja guru berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas pembelajaran (F = 141,328; p < 0,05) dengan nilai Adjusted R² sebesar 0,726, yang menunjukkan bahwa kedua variabel memberikan kontribusi sebesar 72,6% terhadap variasi kualitas pembelajaran. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa peningkatan mutu pembelajaran memerlukan integrasi antara efektivitas supervisi kepala sekolah dan penguatan motivasi kerja guru dalam mendukung transformasi pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Penggerak.
Kata kunci: supervisi akademik, motivasi kerja guru, kualitas pembelajaran

References

Akinlar, A., Ontas, T., Aysu, S., & Atmaca, T. (2025). Developing colleagues through recognition: The role of international award-winning teachers in professional growth in Türkiye. Teaching and Teacher Education, 168, 105221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105221

Alanoglu, M. (2022). The role of instructional leadership in increasing teacher self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09726-5

Amzat, I. H., Yanti, P. G., & Suswandari, S. (2022). Estimating the effect of principal instructional and distributed leadership on professional development of teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221109585

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119

Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2024). Principals’ digital instructional leadership during the pandemic: Impact on teachers’ intrinsic motivation and students’ learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 934–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221113411

Bugaenko, T., Nikolayeva, T., Kravets, H., & Tsynova, M. (2025). Reimagining education for the future: A comprehensive analysis of global trends and innovations. Futurity Education, 5(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2025.03.25.11

Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 711–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09549-4

Cann, R. F., Sinnema, C., Daly, A. J., Rodway, J., & Liou, Y.-H. (2022). The power of school conditions: Individual, relational, and organizational influences on educator wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 775614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.775614

Cansoy, R., Parlar, H., & Polatcan, M. (2022). Collective teacher efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(6), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1708470

Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187

Dami, Z. A., Wiyono, B. B., Imron, A., Burhanuddin, B., Supriyanto, A., & Daliman, M. (2022). Principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership in the perspective of principal strengthening training: Work engagement, job satisfaction and motivation to leave. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2064407

Dorukbaşi, E., & Cansoy, R. (2024). Examining the mediating role of teacher professional learning between perceived instructional leadership and teacher instructional practices. European Journal of Education, 59(3), e12672. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12672

Fackler, S., Malmberg, L. E., & Sammons, P. (2021). An international perspective on teacher self-efficacy: Personal, structural and environmental factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, Article 103255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103255

Granziera, H., Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2022). Understanding teacher wellbeing through job demands-resources theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, Article 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103622

Hoskin, M. J. (2026). Teacher agency in continuing professional development: addressing barriers to sustainable models of educational improvement in Further Education and skills. Education+ Training, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2025-0434

Hadi, A. T. A., & Hikmah, N. (2025). Implementasi asesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada jenjang sekolah dasar. Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(3), 2001–2014. https://doi.org/10.59240/kjsk.v5i3.387

Han, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Teacher motivation, engagement, and professional commitment in educational change. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 768750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768750

Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411

Huang, L., Huang, Y., & Zhou, S. (2023). Examining principal leadership effects on teacher professional learning in China: A multilevel analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(6), 1278–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211041626

Kasthuri, H., Kamreddy, A., & Mandadi, S. (2025). Reimagine education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5176532

Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). “Like a rug had been pulled from under you”: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England during the first six weeks of the UK lockdown. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12381

Kingsford-Smith, A. A., Collie, R. J., Loughland, T., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2023). Teacher wellbeing in rural, regional, and metropolitan schools: Examining resources and demands across locations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104229

Li, Y., Chen, J., Lu, J., & Wang, X. (2025). A meta-analysis of teacher well-being: A job demands and resources perspective. Educational Research Review, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100719

Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910439

Liu, Y., Li, L., & Huang, C. (2022). To what extent is shared instructional leadership related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance in China? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2029746

Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Towards an understanding of teacher attrition: A meta-analysis of burnout, job satisfaction, and teachers’ intentions to quit. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103425

Nadav, N., Benoliel, P., & Schechter, C. (2024). Principals' systems thinking and student outcomes: The intervening role of school structure. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(6), 1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2023-0530

Naidu, S. (2021). Reimagining education futures to lead learning for tomorrow. Distance Education, 42(3), 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956306

Nawaz, A., Haider, A., & Nazar, A. (2025). Reimagining education: Preparing students for a future-driven world. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(2), 850–859. https://jalt.com.pk/index.php/jalt/article/view/698

Naz, F., & Rashid, S. (2021). Effective instructional leadership can enhance teachers’ motivation and improve students’ learning outcomes. SJESR, 4(1), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol4-iss1-2021(477-485)

Pan, J., Loughland, T., Collie, R. J., Kingsford-Smith, A. A., Ryan, M., Mansfield, C., ... & Tanti, M. (2025). The impact of practicum job demands and resources on pre-service teachers’ occupational commitment and job intent. Teaching and Teacher Education, 153, 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104841

Pourtousi, Z., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2020). Teachers’ motivation and its association with job commitment and work engagement. Psychological Studies, 65(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00571-x

Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2021). Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in collaborative settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103403

Rangkuti, P. M., & Dwi, D. F. (2025). Perspektif asesmen autentik sebagai alat evaluasi dalam Merdeka Belajar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.34535

Sato, M., Fernández Castillo, F., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2022). Teacher motivation and burnout of English-as-a-foreign-language teachers: Do demotivators really demotivate them? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 891452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891452

Schnitzler, K., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2020). All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 70, Article 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101302

Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2020). Systems thinking leadership in school improvement. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1632688

Situmorang, W. R., Situmorang, J., Nainggolan, G. P., Purba, M., & Siboro, D. V. (2025). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di sekolah Indonesia: Sebuah studi literatur tentang peluang dan tantangan. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(2), 14154–14159. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.4152

Su, X., & Su, Y. (2025). “Grow like sea anemones”: A collaborative autoethnography of emotions and professional identity formation of two teacher-researchers specializing in computer-assisted language learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 168, 105263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105263

Thien, L. M., & Liu, P. (2024). Linear and nonlinear relationships between instructional leadership and teacher professional learning through teacher self-efficacy as a mediator: A partial least squares analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02500-5

Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, Article 103408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103408

Wiyono, B. B., Widayati, S. P., Imron, A., Bustami, A. L., & Dayati, U. (2022). Implementation of group and individual supervision techniques, and its effect on the work motivation and performance of teachers at school organization. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 943838. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943838

Zahed-Babelan, A., Koulaei, G., Moeinikia, M., & Sharif, A. R. (2019). Instructional leadership effects on teachers' work engagement: Roles of school culture, empowerment, and job characteristics. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 137–156.

Zakariya, Y. F. (2020). Effects of school climate and teacher self-efficacy on job satisfaction of mostly STEM teachers: A structural multigroup invariance approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00209-4