Kesenjangan Implementasi Artificial Intelligence dalam Tata Kelola Pendidikan Di Era Society 5.0

Dwi Rahayu, Mardalena Mardalena, Agus Sugianto

Abstract


Abstract: The implementation of AI in educational governance faces a significant gap between policy and practice, particularly at the school management level, which has been largely overlooked. This study was a mixed-methods, sequential, explanatory study that analyzed school management's digital readiness, identified inhibiting and enabling factors, and formulated an adaptive governance transformation model in Merangin Regency. Quantitative data were collected from 210 respondents (principals, vice principals, and administrative heads) through surveys, followed by in-depth interviews and FGDs. Results indicate that school management's digital readiness is very low (mean 2.32/5), with managerial digital competence deficit as the most critical dimension (mean 1.92). Border schools and B/C-accredited schools fall into Quadrant III (Foundation Stage), while schools with internal champions reach Quadrant I (Integration Ready). The Staged Transformation Model (3T Model) was formulated as an adaptive solution. This study concludes that the root cause of AI implementation gaps is not technical but managerial and systemic; thus, interventions must focus on strengthening digital leadership capacity, internal policies, and champion development. Policy implications include the need for a national AI adoption roadmap that considers regional disparities in readiness.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; educational governance; school management digital readiness; management transformation; Society 5.0

Abstrak: Implementasi AI dalam tata kelola pendidikan menghadapi kesenjangan signifikan antara kebijakan dan praktik lapangan, khususnya pada level manajemen sekolah yang selama ini terabaikan. Penelitian mixed methods sequential explanatory ini bertujuan menganalisis kesiapan digital manajemen sekolah, mengidentifikasi faktor penghambat dan pendorong, serta merumuskan model transformasi tata kelola adaptif di Kabupaten Merangin. Data kuantitatif dikumpulkan dari 210 responden (kepala sekolah, wakil, kepala TU) melalui survei, dilanjutkan wawancara mendalam dan FGD. Hasil menunjukkan tingkat kesiapan digital manajemen sekolah sangat rendah (mean 2,32/5), dengan defisit kompetensi digital manajerial sebagai dimensi paling kritis (mean 1,92). Sekolah perbatasan dan akreditasi B/C berada pada Kuadran III (Tahap Fondasi), sementara sekolah dengan champion internal mencapai Kuadran I (Siap Terintegrasi). Model Transformasi Bertahap (3T Model) dirumuskan sebagai alternatif solusi adaptif. Simpulan penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa akar masalah implementasi AI bukan pada faktor teknis melainkan manajerial-sistemik, sehingga intervensi harus diarahkan pada penguatan kapasitas kepemimpinan digital, kebijakan internal, dan pengembangan champion. Implikasi kebijakan mencakup perlunya peta jalan nasional adopsi AI yang mempertimbangkan disparitas kesiapan antar wilayah.
Kata kunci: artificial intelligence; tata kelola pendidikan; kesiapan digital manajemen sekolah; transformasi manajemen; Society 5.0

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adewale, M.D. et al. (2024) ‘Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on students’ academic performance in open and distance learning: A systematic literature review’, Heliyon, 10(22), p. e40025. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40025.

Akbar, M.N. (2025) ‘Use of artificial intelligence tools by doctoral students: a mixed-methods explanatory-sequential investigation’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(7), pp. 995–1013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2515135.

Alnawati, A. (2026) ‘Teacher Readiness and School Infrastructure in Implementing AI Integrated Programming Learning in Junior High School: A Systematic Literature Review’, Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 6(2). Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i2.1529.

Alqurni, J. (2026) ‘Sustainable adoption of artificial intelligence and the Metaverse in higher education: an environmental, social, and governance–based analysis of pedagogical innovation and perceived student learning outcomes’, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1738730.

Barus, O.P. et al. (2025) ‘Shaping generative AI governance in higher education: Insights from student perception’, International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, p. 100452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100452.

Bernard, R.M. et al. (2014) ‘An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: the case of technology integration research in higher education’, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(3), pp. 183–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9084-z.

Calp, M.H. and Bütüner, R. (2022) ‘Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society’, in Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0. Elsevier, pp. 175–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88468-6.00006-1.

Chan, C.K.Y. and Hu, W. (2023) ‘Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.

Crompton, H. and Burke, D. (2024) ‘The Educational Affordances and Challenges of ChatGPT: State of the Field’, TechTrends, 68(2), pp. 380–392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0.

European Commission (2022) Ethical guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

Falloon, G. (2020) ‘From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), pp. 2449–2472. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.

Favero, L. et al. (2026) ‘AI in Education Beyond Learning Outcomes: Cognition, Agency, Emotion, and Ethics’. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04598.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J. and Mceachen, J. (2018) Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World, Deep Learning: Engage the World, Change the World.

Gao, Z. and Chen, S. (2025) ‘Artificial Intelligence-Driven Transformation of Educational Governance Models’, International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(5), pp. 709–720. Available at: https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.7208.

George, A.S. and George, A.S.H. (2024) ‘Towards a Super Smart Society 5 . 0 : Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Emerging Technologies for Social Innovation Partners Universal International Research Journal ( PUIRJ ) Towards a Super Smart Society 5 . 0 : Opportunities and Challenges of’, Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ), 03(April-June), pp. 1–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11522048.

Ghimire, A. and Edwards, J. (2024) ‘From Guidelines to Governance: A Study of AI Policies in Education’. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.15601.

Hannoon, A. and Mahmood, A. (2023) Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Society 5.0. Springer.

Hilbert, M. (2016) ‘The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014’, Telecommunications Policy, 40(6), pp. 567–581. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006.

Holmes, A.J. et al. (2023) ‘Effects of plyometric-and cycle-based high-intensity interval training on body composition, aerobic capacity, and muscle function in young females: a field-based group fitness assessment’, Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 48(12), pp. 932–945. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2022-0465.

Ifenthaler, D. and Yau, J.Y.-K. (2020) ‘Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), pp. 1961–1990. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J.W. and Stick, S.L. (2006) ‘Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice’, Field Methods, 8(1). Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X052822.

Jie, H., Gooi, L.M. and Lou, Y. (2025) ‘Digital maturity, dynamic capabilities and innovation performance in high-tech SMEs’, International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, p. 103971. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103971.

Kimmons, R. and Rosenberg, J.M. (2022) ‘Trends and Topics in Educational Technology, 2022 Edition’, TechTrends, 66(2), pp. 134–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00713-0.

Knox, J. (2020) ‘Artificial intelligence and education in China’, Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), pp. 298–311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236.

Komarudin, K. (2025) ‘Ethics and Governance of AI in Education: Balancing Innovation and Accountability’, International Journal of Social Research, 3(4), pp. 177–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59888/insight.v3i4.59.

Kotter, J.P. (1996) Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) ‘Situated cognition: Legitimate peripheral participation’, New York: Cam-bridge University Press. LaveSituated …, p. 138. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/1301652/cb419d882cd5bb5286069675b449da38.pdf?1506793465.

Lima, L. et al. (2025) ‘Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Education in Indonesia’, MJTI: Multidisciplinary Journal of Technology and Informatics, 1(2), p. 79. Available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Long, D.Y. et al. (2026) ‘Artificial intelligence in higher education: a systematic review of its impact on student engagement and the mediating role of teaching methods’, Frontiers in Education, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1648661.

Luckin, R. et al. (2016) Intelligence Unleashed, Pearson. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756/.

Mardalena et al. (2026) ‘Digital Leadership in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis’, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan: Pedagogi, 26(1), pp. 252–260. Available at: https://jet.or.id/index.php/jet/article/view/254.

Masri, A. et al. (2023) ‘Challenges of school leaders ’ digital leadership : An initial study in’, Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), pp. 57–65.

Mejeh, M., Sarbach, L. and Hascher, T. (2024) ‘Effects of adaptive feedback through a digital tool – a mixed-methods study on the course of self-regulated learning’, Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), pp. 1–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12510-8.

Muawanah, U., Marini, A. and Sarifah, I. (2024) ‘The interconnection between digital literacy, artificial intelligence, and the use of E-learning applications in enhancing the sustainability of Regional Languages: Evidence from Indonesia’, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, p. 101169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101169.

Mustafa, M.Y. et al. (2024) ‘A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda’, Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), p. 59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5.

OECD (2023) OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem, OECD Digital Education Outlook. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c74f03de-en.

Peruzzo, F. and Allan, J. (2024) ‘Rethinking inclusive (digital) education: lessons from the pandemic to reconceptualise inclusion through convivial technologies’, Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), pp. 244–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2131817.

Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holmes, W. and Nemorin, S. (2024) ‘The Ethics of AI in Education’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329067.

Punie, Y. and Redecker, C. (2017) European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2760/159770.

Reynolds, R. (2021) ‘JanvanDijk. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 208 pp. £17.99 (paperback) (ISBN 9781509534456).’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(1), pp. 136–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24355.

Robinson, L. et al. (2015) ‘Digital inequalities and why they matter’, Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), pp. 569–582. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.

Rogers, E.M. and Everett, M. (1983) Diffusion of Third Edition. Available at: teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/.../everett-m-rogers-diffusion-of-innovati..

Röhl, S., Pietsch, M. and Cramer, C. (2024) ‘School leaders’ self-efficacy and its impact on innovation: Findings of a repeated measurement study’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(6), pp. 1477–1496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221132482.

Schmitz, M.-L. et al. (2023) ‘Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools: Empowering teachers to use technology in a more demanding way’, Computers & Education, 204, p. 104880. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104880.

Selwyn, N. (2017) Education and Technology. Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952.

Selwyn, N. (2022) ‘The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes’, European Journal of Education, 57(4), pp. 620–631. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532.

Sheninger, E.C. (2019) Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Srinivasa, K.G., Siddesh, G.M. and Manisekhar, S.R. (2022) Society 5.0: Smart Future Towards Enhancing the Quality of Society. Springer.

Sun, P. et al. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence Enabling Education Governance: Value Orientation, Key Issues, Path Optimization’, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(11), pp. 219–237. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.1211015.

Timan, A. and Imron, A. (2022) ‘Digital Leadership Kepala Sekolah Hubungannya dengan Kinerja Guru dan Kompetensi Siswa Era Abad 21’, JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(4), pp. 323–333.

Tondeur, J. et al. (2025) ‘Preparing preservice teachers to teach with digital technologies: An update of effective SQD-strategies’, Computers & Education, 232, p. 105262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105262.

UNESCO (2021) AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350.

UNESCO (2023a) Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development, UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994.

UNESCO (2023b) Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms?, UNESCO.

UNESCO (2023c) Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? Paris.

Verma, A. and Dhaigude, A.S. (2026) ‘Bridging Theory and Practice: A Mixed-Method Exploration of AI’s Role in Higher Education’, Sage Open, 16(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261417610.

Wang, S. et al. (2024) ‘Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review’, Expert Systems with Applications, 252, p. 124167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.

Warschauer, M. (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Williamson, B. and Piattoeva, N. (2022) ‘Education Governance and Datafication’, Education and Information Technologies, 27, pp. 3515–3531.

Williamson, B., Bayne, S. and Shay, S. (2020) ‘The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives’, Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), pp. 351–365. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811.

World Economic Forum (2024) Revolutionizing classrooms: How AI is reshaping global education, World Economic Forum. Available at: http://weforum.org/press/2024/04/revolutionizing-classrooms-how-ai-is-reshaping-global-education/.

Zakariah, N.D., A. Ghani, M.F. and Radzi, N.M. (2023) ‘Strategic leadership in Malaysia education: A systematic literature reviews’, Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v11i2.60524.

Zawacki-Richter, O. et al. (2019) ‘Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

Zhu, H., Sun, Y. and Yang, J. (2025) ‘Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), p. 1111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05252-6.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

 

  

 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.