Email this article 
Hide
Show all
2.png){kind=logo}
Revealing the power practices and ideology of pedophiles in pedophile community through transitivity choices
Abstract
Among the choices of grammatical forms, the transitive system stands out in the pedophile community. The purpose of this study is to reveal the exercise of power and ideology of pedophiles through their transitive choices. In systemic functional linguistics (SFL), the transitivity system is widely used to analyze isolated clauses and contextual clauses. The data for this research was taken from conversational texts by pedophiles at WordPress Jakongsu from December 2021 to February 2022. Data were collected through netnography approach (Kozinets, 2010), which applies ethnography collection technique in the virtual world. The existed data were compiled in a digital archive. To analyze the data, Fairclough's critical discourse analysis (CDA) model was used (i.e., description, interpretation, and explanation). The findings of the study indicate that pedophiles tend to use clauses of the material process than those of mental and relational processes.
Mengungkap praktik kuasa dan ideologi pelaku kejahatan dalam komunitas pedofilia melalui pilihan ketransitifan
Di antara pilihan terhadap bentuk-bentuk gramatikal, pilihan sistem ketransitifan begitu menonjol dalam komunitas pedofilia. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengungkap praktik kuasa dan ideologi pelaku kejahatan dalam komunitas pedofilia melalui pilihan ketransitifan. Dalam linguistik sistemik fungsional (LSF), sistem transitivitas adalah sarana yang umum digunakan untuk menganalisis klausa yang terisolasi maupun klausa dalam konteks. Data penelitian ini diambil dari satu komunitas pedofilia di Wordpress Jakongsu selama Desember 2021 hingga Februari 2022. Prosedur pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini berupa netnografi yang mengacu kepada pendapat Kozinets (2010), yang merupakan bentuk adopsi dari teknik pengumpulan etnografi pada ranah dunia maya. Data yang sudah ada dikumpulkan dalam pengarsipan digital. Untuk menganalisis data peneliti menggunakan model analisis wacana kritis dari Fairclough, yakni deskripsi, interpretasi, dan eksplanasi. Temuan dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam pedofilia memiliki kecenderuan untuk menggunakan klausa yang berjenis proses material dibandingkan klausa yang berjenis proses mental dan proses relasional.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akdeniz, Y. (1997). Regulation of child pornography on the internet: Cases and material. CyberLaw Research Unit, School of Law, University of Leeds.
Ardhianti, M. (2021). Konstruksi tanda dalam teks kejahatan siber di Indonesia: Analisis wacana semiotika. [Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Negeri Surabaya].
Bartley, L. V. (2018). Putting transitivity to the test: A review of the Sydney and Cardiff models. Functional Linguistic. 5(4), 1–12.
Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2011). An exploratory study of internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: Has the internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sexual Abuse, 23(1), 72–91.
Chiang, E., & Grant, T. D. (2018). Deceptive identity performance: Offender moves and multiple personas in online child abuse conversations. Applied Linguistics. 40(4), 675–698.
Chiu, M. M., Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., & Ringenberg, T. R. (2018). Exploring detection of contact vs. fantasy online sexual offenders in chats with minors: Statistical discourse analysis of self-disclosure and emotion words. Child Abuse & Neglect, 81, 128–138.
Craven, S., Sarah, B., and Gilchrist, E. (2006). Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12(3), 287–299.
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. Verso.
Fairclough, N. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 739–763.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman Group UK Limited.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Longman Group Limited.
Finkelhor, D. (1997). Child sexual abuse challenges facing child protection and mental health professionals. In Childhood and Trauma Separation, Abuse, War (pp. 101–115). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Galasinski, D. (2000). The language of deception: A discourse analytical study. Sage Publications, Inc.
Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse, Theory and Practice (pp. 72–81). Sage publications.
Halliday, M.A. & Hasan, R. (1985). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Ltd.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar. (3rd Ed.). Hodder Education.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar (4rd Ed.). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st edition. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. (1977). Language as social semiotic: Towards general Sociolinguistics theory. In Makkai, A., Makkai V.B.., & Heilmann, L. (Eds.),. Linguistics at the Crossroads (pp. 13–41). Tipografia-La Garangola.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography. Sage.
Lanning, K. (1992). Child molesters: A behavioral analysis for law enforcement officers investigating cases of child sexual exploitation. U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice.
Marcum, C. (2007). Interpreting the intentions of Internet predators: An examination of online predatory behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16(4), 99–114.
Martin, J. (2015). Cohesion and texture. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., & Schiffrin, D. In Eds., The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd Ed) (pp. 61–80). John Wiley & Sons.
Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). Descriptive motifs and generalizations. 537–574.
Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Extending the description of process type within the system of transitivity in delicacy based on Levinian verb classes. Functions of Language, 21(2), 139-175.
Me, G. (2007). Investigation strategy for the small pedophiles world. In In Encyclopedia of information ethics and security (pp. 418–425). IGI Global.
Polaschek, D. L., Ward, T., Laws, D. R., & Hudson, S. M. (2003). Empathy and victim empathy. Sexual Deviance: Issues and Controversies (pp. 172–189).
Puzynina, J. (1992). Jexyk w swiecie wartosci [Language in the world of values]. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Rogers, R. (2011). An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in education (Second Edition). Taylor & Francis.
Santoso, A. (2008). Jejak Halliday dalam linguistik kritis dan analisis wacana kritis. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Seni, 36(1), 1–14.
Santoso, A. (2012). Studi bahasa kritis: Menguak bahasa membongkar kuasa. Mandar Maju.
Sinar, T. (2012). Teori dan analisis wacana: Pendekatan linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. CV. Mitra Medan.
Skrede, J. (2018). Kritisk diskursanalyse. Cappelen Damm AS.
Slembrouck, S. (2001). Explanation, interpretation and critique in the analysis of discourse. Critique of Anthropology, 21, 3–57.
Van Dijk, T. (2001). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. In (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300–317). Sage Publications Ltd.
Voet, J. (2020). “Trust me” power in the language of sexual predators. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Wodak, R. (1989). Introduction, in R. Wodak (ed.). In In Language, power and ideology (pp. 1–9). Benjamins.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v51i22023p176
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dear Sir/Madam
We appreciate your continued confidence and trust in Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya (JBS). In order to enhance the service, readability, and quality of JBS publications, we will be transitioning to a new website, https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs, in collaboration with Digital Commons (Elsevier) starting in July 2024.
Sincerely
Yusuf Hanafi
(Editor in chief)