Performativity of JaF art agency on the land, city, and its surroundings

Joni Agung Sudarmanto

Abstract


This study aims to see the performativity of terracotta through the process and the culture of the roof tile production industry in Jatiwangi District, Majalengka Regency, West Java. This research used qualitative methods, and collecting data used a combination of three methods: literature study, participatory observation, and semi-structured interviews. After the data is collected, the next step is data analysis using the concept of performativity and art agency. JaF emerged by taking on the role of a change agent, inviting Jatiwangi residents, especially roof tile industry players, to survive together and stay true to their native culture using participatory arts engagement. Perform various artistic activities with Jatiwangi residents to declare that they exist. They are using artistic approaches to narrate defensive actions, holding various forms of art festivals to show their progress in Jatiwangi. This is due to the performativity of roof tiles as the initial trigger, the community, and the development of Jatiwangi as an "art factory" into Jatiwangi Art Factory (JaF). So, in JaF, roof tiles, artisans, artists, cultural actors, terracotta, and the "art factory" brand is a performance agency in the land, city, and surroundings

Performativitas badan seni di daerah, kota, dan sekitarnya di JaF

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat performativitas terakota melalui proses dan budaya industri produksi genteng di Kecamatan Jatiwangi, Kabupaten Majalengka, Jawa Barat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, dan pengumpulan data menggunakan kombinasi tiga metode: studi kepustakaan, observasi partisipatif, dan wawancara semi terstruktur. Setelah data terkumpul, langkah selanjutnya adalah analisis data dengan menggunakan konsep performativity dan art agency. JaF muncul dengan mengambil peran sebagai agen perubahan, mengajak warga Jatiwangi, khususnya pelaku industri genteng, untuk bertahan bersama dan tetap setia pada budaya asli mereka melalui keterlibatan seni partisipatif. Melakukan berbagai kegiatan seni bersama warga Jatiwangi untuk menyatakan bahwa mereka ada. Mereka menggunakan pendekatan artistik untuk menceritakan tindakan defensif, mengadakan berbagai bentuk festival seni untuk menunjukkan kemajuan mereka di Jatiwangi. Hal ini dikarenakan performativitas genteng sebagai pemicu awal, masyarakat, dan berkembangnya Jatiwangi sebagai “pabrik seni” menjadi Jatiwangi Art Factory (JaF). Jadi, di JaF, genteng, pengrajin, seniman, aktor budaya, terakota, dan merek "pabrik seni" adalah agensi pertunjukan di tanah, kota, dan sekitarnya.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, K. M. (2006). Art as politics: Re-Crafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Tora-ja, Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139033824.002

Allen, R. (2008). The anthropology of art and the art of anthropology: A complex relationship. University of Stellenbosch.

Blažek, J., & Květoň, V. (2022). Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional devel-opment: The case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054976

Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press.

Brady, B., Forkan, C., & Moran, L. (2018). Spaces of connection and belonging: Young people’s perspectives on the role of youth cafés in their lives. Child Care in Practice, 24(4), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2017.1299110

Brzozowska, B. (2016). “Creative city” as a brand – the case of Łódź. Creativity Studies, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2015.1112312

Budiawan, H., & Martyastiadi, Y. S. (2020). The explanation of life experience reflection as ideas of artistic research. International Journal of Creative and Arts Studies, 7(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.24821/ijcas.v7i2.4658

Campbell, S. (2014). Kamasan art in museum collections: Entangled histories of art collecting in Bali. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 170(2–3), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17002001

Facca, A. E., & Aldrich, J. W. (2011). Putting the past to work for the future. The Public Histo-rian, 33(3), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.3.38

Garrido Castellano, C. (2018). Artistic autonomy in non-autonomous contexts: Reframing col-lective agency and insurgence from Caribbean artist-managed spaces. Social Identities, 24(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1303370

Gell, A. (2006). Technology of enchantment and enchantment of technology. In E. Hirsch (Ed.), The art of anthropology essay and diagrams. Athlone Press.

Hadley, B., & McDonald, D. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of disability arts, culture, and media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351254687

Ivey, B. (2011). Values and value in folklore. Journal of American Folklore, 124(491), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.124.491.0006

Jones, A., Potts, A., & Pollock, G. (2003). Meaning, identity, embodiment: The uses of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology in art history. In Art and thought (pp. 72–90). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774199.ch4

Jurriëns, E. (2019). Environmental aesthetics in Indonesian contemporary art. Third Text, 33(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2018.1538037

Langellier, K. M. (1999). Personal narrative, performance, performativity: Two or three things I know for sure. Text and Performance Quarterly, 19(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939909366255

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.

Maryunani, S. R. (2019). Community empowerment as a means in promoting local products: A case study in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2019.1557821

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

Nakamura, J. (2013). Pride and the experience of meaning in daily life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830765

Noland, C. (2009). Agency & embodiment: Performing gestures/producing culture. Harvard University Press.

Paganoni, M. C. (2012). City branding and social inclusion in the glocal city. Mobilities, 7(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631809

Ploskonka, K. (2021). Contesting convention: Agency in Dushanbe’s contemporary art scene. Central Asian Survey, 40(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2020.1865270

Ricci, C., & Tavinor, M. (2021). Art, market and agency at the Venice Biennale, 1895–1993. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 26(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2021.1943207

Rodrigues, M. dos A. A. (2018). Writing life narratives through art practice. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 15(2–3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1429866

Sampurno, M. B. T., Prabandari, Y. S., & Marianto, M. D. (2020). Theoretical exploration of art therapy and education for autistic children. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching (IJIET), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.2020.040209

Sano, A. (2012). Agency and resilience in the sex trade: Adolescent girls in rural Indramayu. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2011.636064

Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies: An introduction. Routledge.

Schlesinger, P., Selfe, M., & Munro, E. (2015). Inside a cultural agency: Team ethnography and knowledge exchange. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 45(2), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2015.1039741

Sharpe, K. (2004). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. European Journal of Archaeolo-gy, 7(2), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.2004.7.2.209

Shkedi, A. (2019). Introduction to data analysis in qualitative research. Springer International Publishing.

Short, J. R., Benton, L. M., Luce, W., & Walton, J. (1997). The reconstruction of a postindus-trial city. Journal of Architectural Education, 50(4), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1997.10734731

Shukla, P. (2014). Northern European folklore: Fieldwork, heritage, and embodiment. Journal of Folklore Research, 51(3), 249–252.

Shuqin, S. (2012). Cultural and creative industries and art education. Physics Procedia, 33, 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.266

Smith, K., Pickering, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2022). The creative life: A daily diary study of creativity, affect, and well-being in creative individuals. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2122371

Soewarlan, S. (2019). Re-creating rural performing arts for tourism in Indonesia. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17(5), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2018.1541993

Svasek, M. (Ed.). (2012). Moving subjects, moving objects: Transnationalism, cultural produc-tion and emotions. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Svasek, M. (2015). Affective moves: Transit, transition and transformation. December.

Tang, Y. (2016). Potentials of community-based tourism in transformations towards green economies after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in West China. Journal of Mountain Sci-ence, 13(9), 1688–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3510-1

Torrez, B., Wakslak, C., & Amit, E. (2019). Dynamic distance: Use of visual and verbal means of communication as social signals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85(August 2018), 103849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103849

Willis, J. (2007). The neuroscience of joyful education. Educational Leadership, 64, 1–4.

Ylivuori, S. (2022). Performativity confounded: Agency, resistance, and the history of polite-ness. Text and Performance Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2022.2100925

Zhang, L., & Stewart, W. (2017). Sustainable tourism development of landscape heritage in a rural community: A case study of Azheke Village at China Hani Rice Terraces. Built Herit-age, 1(4), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03545656




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v52i12024p119

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Web
AnalyticsView My Stats
Based on the Official Letter from the Director General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No 158/E/KPT/2021, dated December 27, 2021, Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Pengajarannya is granted RANK 2 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC ACCREDITATION PERIOD I YEAR 2021. This rating status is valid for 5 (five) years up to Vol 53, No 1, 2025.

Dear Sir/Madam

We appreciate your continued confidence and trust in Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya (JBS). In order to enhance the service, readability, and quality of JBS publications, we will be transitioning to a new website, https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs, in collaboration with Digital Commons (Elsevier) starting in July 2024.

Sincerely

Yusuf Hanafi
(Editor in chief)


Editorial Office:
Gedung D16 Lantai 2 Fakultas Sastra UM Jl. Semarang 5 Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145

Publisher:
Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
JPtpp is licensed under