Cultural violence in Indonesian ethnic humor: A critical discourse analysis

Surahmat Surahmat, I Dewa Putu Wijana, BR Suryo Baskoro

Abstract


This study proposes to explain that Indonesian ethnic humor show cultural violence on the target group, in addition, to establishing an interethnic dialogue.  Cultural violence is defined as the entire cultural aspect that can be used to legitimize violence, whether direct or structural. Forms of cultural violence can include religion, ideology, language, empirical sciences, formal science, and cosmology. The problems questioned are (1) how cultural violence is depicted in the language structure of Indonesian ethnic humor and (2) how are the forms of cultural violence in the discourse of Indonesian ethnic humor. Data on ethnic humor were from books, magazines, websites, and social media. All were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. The results show that the potential for cultural violence in ethnic humor can be traced by its content and context. The content relates to the expressed substance and language, while context is under users' social and historical formation.  Ethnic humor in Indonesia targets ethnic minorities such as Chinese and Madurese. When it comes to racist circumstances, ethnic humor can normalize structural discrimination and violence against the referred ethnicities. Cultural violence includes stigmatization, normalization of discriminatory policies, and social exclusion. This finding suggests that nonserious discourse, such as humor, has a severe social impact, therefore it must be used wisely.

Budaya kekerasan dalam humor etnis Indonesia: Analisis wacana kritis

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bahwa humor etnis Indonesia menunjukkan kekerasan budaya pada kelompok sasaran, selain itu, untuk membangun dialog antar-etnis. Kekerasan budaya didefinisikan sebagai seluruh aspek budaya yang dapat digunakan untuk melegitimasi kekerasan, baik langsung maupun struktural. Bentuk kekerasan budaya dapat mencakup agama, ideologi, bahasa, ilmu pengetahuan empiris, ilmu pengetahuan formal, dan kosmologi. Pertanyaan yang diajukan adalah (1) bagaimana kekerasan budaya digambarkan dalam struktur bahasa humor etnis Indonesia dan (2) bagaimana bentuk kekerasan budaya dalam wacana humor etnis Indonesia. Data tentang humor etnis berasal dari buku, majalah, situs web, dan media sosial. Semua dianalisis menggunakan analisis wacana kritis. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa potensi kekerasan budaya dalam humor etnis dapat dilacak melalui konten dan konteksnya. Konten terkait dengan substansi dan bahasa yang diekspresikan, sedangkan konteks berada di bawah pembentukan sosial dan sejarah pengguna. Humor etnis di Indonesia menargetkan minoritas etnis seperti Tionghoa dan Madura. Dalam situasi yang rasis, humor etnis dapat memperkuat diskriminasi struktural dan kekerasan terhadap etnis yang disebutkan. Kekerasan budaya mencakup penstigmaan, normalisasi kebijakan diskriminatif, dan eksklusi sosial. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa wacana yang tidak serius, seperti humor, memiliki dampak sosial yang serius, oleh karena itu harus digunakan dengan bijak.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abtahi, Y., & Wagner, D. (2016). Violence in un-rooted mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(3), 39–40.

Aini, N., Nugroho, A., & Triyono Lukmantoro. (2013). Stereotip etnis Tionghoa dalam stand-up comedy pada lakon “Koper” (analisis semiotik). Interaksi Online, 2(2).

Alfirdaus, L. K., Hiariej, E., & Adeney-Risakotta, F. (2016). The position of Minang-Chinese relationship in the history of inter-ethnic groups relations in Padang, West Sumatra. Humaniora, 28(1), 79–96.

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Apte, M. (1985). Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach. Cornell University Press.

Apte, M. L. (1985). Humor and laughter: An Anthropological Approach. Cornell University Press.

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis (1st ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.

Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (2017). Linguistics and humor theory. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (pp. 49–63). Routledge.

Baxter, J. (2010). Discourse-analytic in approaches to text and talk. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 117–137). Continuum International Publishing Group.

Bourdieu, P. (2020). Bahasa dan Kekuasaan Simbolik. IRCiSoD.

Cassaignard-Viaud, L.-A. (2021). From Culture to Behaviour: How Can a Culture of Violence Affect Organized Conflict? [Master’s Thesis]. Uppsala University.

Christanti, D. (2003). Prasangka antar kelompok etnis Dayak dan Madura ditinjau berdasarkan integrated threat theory dan social dominance theory [Postgraduate Thesis]. Universitas Indonesia.

Cundall, M. (2012). Towards a better understanding of racist and ethnic humor. Humor, 25(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0009

Danandjaja, J. (2003). Folklor Tionghoa. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Routledge.

Fave, L. La, & Mannell, R. (1976). Does ethnic humor serve prejudice? Journal of Communication. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1979-03138-001

Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D., & Jasini, A. (2018). Why We Hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751229

Ford, T. E., Buie, H. S., Mason, S. D., Olah, A. R., Breeden, C. J., & Ferguson, M. A. (2020). Diminished self-concept and social exclusion: Disparagement humor from the target’s perspective. Self and Identity, 19(6), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1653960

Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory. In Personality and Social Psychology Review (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 79–94). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4

Ford, T. E., Richardson, K., & Petit, W. E. (2015). Disparagement humor and prejudice: Contemporary theory and research. Humor, 28(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0017

Ford, T. E., Woodzicka, J. A., Petit, W. E., Richardson, K., & Lappi, S. K. (2015). Sexist humor as a trigger of state self-objectification in women. Humor, 28(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0018

Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.

Gibson, J. (2019). An introduction to the psychology of humor. Routledge.

Gómez, M. M. (2013). Prejudice-based violence. Gender and Sexuality in Latin America - Cases and Decisions, 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6199-5_8/COVER

Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation Cultural Representations and Signifying Practice (pp. 13–71). SAGE Publications.

Herlianto, A. (2019). Dari Kolektor Besi Tua Hingga Sosok Religius: Stereotip Orang Madura Melalui Humor. Deskripsi Bahasa, 2(2), 155–164.

Herlianto, A. (2020). Wacana humor etnis Madura: Analisis sosiolinguistik [Universsitas Gadjah Mada]. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/188436

Hidayat, M. A., & Suryandari, N. (2022). Undoing stereotypes: Counter-stereotyping strategy based on the Madurese cultural identities. Alfuad, 6(1), 25–42. http://ecampus.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/alfuad

Irena, L., & Rusadi, U. (2019). The Commodification of Chinese Stereotypes in Humour of Stand up Comedy Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(2), 376. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.714

Judge, M., & Nel, J. A. (2017). Psychology and hate speech: a critical and restorative encounter. In South African Journal of Psychology (Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 15–20). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317728165

Kaufhold, M. A., & Reuter, C. (2019). Cultural Violence and Peace in Social Media. Information Technology for Peace and Security: IT Applications and Infrastructures in Conflicts, Crises, War, and Peace, 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25652-4_17/COVER

Lesmana, M. (2016). Understanding the characteristics of Madurese through their ethnic. International Review of Humanities Studies, 1(1), 30–37. www.irhs.ui.ac.id,

Liputan6.com. (2001). Masyarakat Kotawaringin Timur Menolak Etnis Madura. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/News/Read/13374/Masyarakat-Kotawaringin-Timur-Menolak-Etnis-Madura.

Lyttle, J. (2011). Effectiveness of humor in persuassion: The case of business ethic traning. The Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 206–2016.

Martin, R. A. (2014). Humor and gender: An overview of psychological research. Gender and Humor. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814322-15

Martineau, W. H. (1972). A Model of the Social Functions of Humor. In H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The Psychology of Humor (pp. 101–125). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-288950-9.50011-0

Maulana, H. A. (2021). Larangan kepemilikan tanah bagi WNI keturunan Tionghoa di Yogyakarta: Perspektif hukum Positif. Staatsrecht Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 1(2), 195–206.

McGhee, P. E., & Duffey, N. S. (1983). The role of identity of the victim in the development of disparagement humor. The Journal of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1983.9711499

Mendiburo-Seguel, A., & Ford, T. E. (2019). The effect of disparagement humor on the acceptability of prejudice. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00354-2

Miranda, P. (2017). Ethnic identity and its relationship to humor. sfsu-dspace.calstate.edu. http://sfsu-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/10211.3/196548

Munhtolib, A. (2008). Melacak akar rasialisme di Indonesia dalam perspektif historis. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 35(2), 104–112.

Murdianto, M. (2018). Stereotipe, prasangka dan resistensinya (Studi kasus pada etnis Madura dan Tionghoa di Indonesia). Qalamuna, 10(2), 137–160.

Pérez, R. (2016). Racist humor: then and now. Sociology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12411

Pérez, R. (2017). Racism without hatred? Racist humor and the myth of “colorblindness.” Sociological Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719699

Pérez, R. (2022). The Souls of White Jokes: How Racist Humor Fuels White Supremacy. Stanford University Press.

Rahman, K. (2019). Warga Cempaka Kalimantan Selatan Tolak Pendatang dari Madura. Tempo.Co.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. In Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3

Sakki, I., & Castrén, L. (2022). Dehumanization through humour and conspiracies in online hate towards Chinese people during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 00, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJSO.12543

Schnurr, S., & Plester, B. (2016). Functionalist discourse analysis of humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of the Linguistics of Humor (pp. 309–321). Routledge.

Setijadi, C. (2017). Chinese Indonesians in the Eyes of the Pribumi Public. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_38.pdf

Setyaningsih, N. (2013). Ethnic stereotypes in stand-up comedy. Prosiding The 5th International Conference on Indonesian Studies: “Ethnicity and Globalization,” 144–157. http://nationalgeographic.co.id/berita/2012/06/

Springs, J. A. (2015). Structural and Cultural Violence in Religion and Peacebuilding. The Oxford Handbook of Religion, Conflict, and Peacebuilding, 145–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199731640.013.0006

Suryaningtyas, V. W., & Setyaningsih, N. (2020). Multiculturalism in Javanese Humor (A Case in “Sing Lucu” Rubric of Panjebar Semangat Magazine). Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 8(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.1.2018.102-116

Thaniago, R., & Jovanović, S. M. (2017). Disciplining Tionghoa Critical Discourse Analysis of News Media During Indonesia’s New Order.

van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283.

Vucetic, S. (2004). Identity is a joking matter: Intergroup humor in Bosnia. Spacesofidentity. Net. https://soi.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/soi/article/download/8011/7167

Vuong, Q. H., Ho, M. T., Nguyen, H. K. T., Vuong, T. T., Tran, T., Hoang, K. L., Vu, T. H., Hoang, P. H., Nguyen, M. H., Ho, M. T., & La, V. P. (2020). On how religions could accidentally incite lies and violence: folktales as a cultural transmitter. Palgrave Communications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0442-3

Weaver, S. (2011). Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: A rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the internet. Ethnicities, 11(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811407755

Wijana, I. D. P. (2015). On ethnic jokes in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 103–110.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v52i12024p43

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Web
AnalyticsView My Stats
Based on the Official Letter from the Director General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No 158/E/KPT/2021, dated December 27, 2021, Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Pengajarannya is granted RANK 2 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC ACCREDITATION PERIOD I YEAR 2021. This rating status is valid for 5 (five) years up to Vol 53, No 1, 2025.

Dear Sir/Madam

We appreciate your continued confidence and trust in Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya (JBS). In order to enhance the service, readability, and quality of JBS publications, we will be transitioning to a new website, https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs, in collaboration with Digital Commons (Elsevier) starting in July 2024.

Sincerely

Yusuf Hanafi
(Editor in chief)


Editorial Office:
Gedung D16 Lantai 2 Fakultas Sastra UM Jl. Semarang 5 Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145

Publisher:
Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
JPtpp is licensed under