Zuhrufi Latifah, Dadang Sudana, Fazri Nur Yusuf


This paper aims to investigate the factors that affect the students’ willingness to communicate in English in the classroom. This study employs a qualitative method, particularly the case study with the use of observation, questionnaire, and interview to collect the data. It can be concluded that there are mainly five factors that influence students’ willingness to communicate namely teachers, topic discussions, classroom environment, peers, and types of activities.

Full Text:



Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468–479.

Cao, Y. (2013). Exploring dynamism in willingness to communicate: A longitudinal case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 160-176.

Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 789-814.

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493.

de Saint Le´ger, D. & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perception and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37, 269-285. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.01.001

Ellis, N., & Collins, L. (2009). Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 329–336.

Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: can online chat help?1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189–212.

Gol, M., Zand-Moghadam, A., & Karrabi, M. (2014). The Construct of Willingness to Communicate and Its Relationship with EFL Learners’ Perceived Verbal and Nonverbal Teacher Immediacy. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 3(1), 135–160.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292.

Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., HosseiniFatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154-180.

Khatib, M., & Nourzadeh, S. (2014). Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3), 266–283.

Lee, G. (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students' oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 142-156.

Liu, N. F., & Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371-384.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171.

MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing Willingness to a L2 : Communicate in Confidence Model Situational. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.

Menezes, E., & Juan-garau, M. (2015). Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments. 23.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. CA: Jossey-Bass

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2016). Dynamics of classroom WTC: Results of a semester study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 651-676.

Ningsih, S. K., Narahara, S., & Mulyono, H. (2018). An exploration of factors contributing to students’ unwillingness to communicate in a foreign language across Indonesian secondary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 811-824.

Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1–9.

Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective.

Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654-671.

Peng, J. E. (2007b). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: A cultural perspective. In J. Liu (Ed.), English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives, and standards (pp. 250-269). London: Continuum.

Peng, J. E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203–213.

Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2010). Learn English or die: The effects of digital games on interaction and willingness to communicate in a foreign language. Digital Culture & Education, 3(1), 3–28.

Riasati, M.J., & Rahimi, F. (2018). Situational and individual factors engendering willingness to speak English in foreign language classrooms. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–15.

Riasati, Mohammad Javad. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287–1297.

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. In Cambridge University Press.

Shao, Q., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2016). Reticence and willingness to communicate (WTC) of East Asian language learners. System, 63, 115–120.

Tavakoli, E., & Davoudi, M. (2017). Willingness to Communicate Orally: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1509–1527.

Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese Conceptualisation of Willingness to Communicate in. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38

Wijaya, H. & Rizkina, P. A. (2015). Factors affecting Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate (A case study in higher education). Leksika, 9(2), 32-38

Wolf, J. P. (2013). Exploring and contrasting EFL learners' perceptions of textbook-assigned and self-selected discussion topics. Language Teaching Research,

(1), 49-66.

Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42(1), 288–295.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISLLAC indexed by:


ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture
Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (Department of Indonesian Literature, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang, Indonesia)

ISSN : 2597-7385 (media online) - SK no. 0005.25977385/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.09 - 19 September 2017

Lisensi Creative Commons

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats