SARCASM USED BY NETIZENS ON TWITTER CASE OF ELECTION BIDDEN-TRUMP ERA

Ezra Melita Sitanggang, Tri Wahyu Retno Ningsih

Abstract


Sarcasm is the crudest style of the syndicate language, and its delivery always shows something that is not pleasant to hear. The intent of the research is to discover types of sarcasm from netizens on Twitter during American Election 2020. The data consist of sentences, phrases, and words that contain sarcasm. The researcher uses sarcasm theory of Camp (2011) that secluded into 4 types they are Propositional Sarcasm, Lexical Sarcasm, Like-Prefixed Sarcasm, and Illocutionary Sarcasm to define depicted of sarcasm that used by netizens on Twitter. After analyzing sarcasm on Twitter, the researcher found an amount types of sarcasm they are 22 tweets contain proporsitional sarcasm, 13 tweets contain lexical sarcasm, 5 tweets contain like-prefixed sarcasm, and 10 tweets contain illocutionary. Proporsitional sarcasm becomes dominant type that found out in this research.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32.

Cahyani, E. H. (2017). A study of Sarcasm In The American Sitcom The Bigbang Theory. Thesis, 8-19.

Camp, E. (2011). Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/. Scientific Research, 1-25.

Fitriyani, A. I. (2020). Creative Thinking Portrayed From Sarcasm of The Netizens' Comments On Donald Trump's Instagram Account. Thesis, 21-33.

Huntington, A. A. (2017). Social Media, Science, and Attack Discourse: How Twitter Discussions of Climate Change Use Sarcasm and Incivility. Science Communication, 603-614.

Husain, S. M. (2018). Sarcasm Analysis Using Social Media: A Literature Review. Scientific Research, 26-30.

J.D, C. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Scientific Research.

Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic . New Media & Society, 6.

Patil, V. H. (2017). A Survey of Sarcasm Detection in Social Media . International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 1748-1751.

Rowe, I. (2015). A comparative analysis of incivility in online political . Scientific Research, 121-138.

SIAGIAN, A. R. (2019). SPEECH ACTS FOUND IN SARCASTIC UTTERANCES IN SPEECHLESS . Thesis, 7-65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um006v6i12022p68-78

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISLLAC indexed by:

CROSSREF SINTA GARUDA GOOGLE SCHOLAR RESEARCH BIB BASE SEARCH PKP INDEX OPENARCHIVES WORLDCAT ONESEARCH

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture
Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (Department of Indonesian Literature, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang, Indonesia)

ISSN : 2597-7385 (media online) - SK no. 0005.25977385/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.09 - 19 September 2017

Lisensi Creative Commons

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats