CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN AND ENGLISH PRAGMATIC: AN IMPLICATIONS IN TEACHING ENGLISH PRAGMATIC TO STUDENTS

Tira Nur Fitria

Abstract


This research explores the pragmatic similarities and differences between Indonesian and English, focusing on their implications for teaching English pragmatics to students. It employs a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze both languages. The analysis shows that Indonesian and English pragmatics share key similarities, such as the use of speech acts, politeness, implicature, deixis, and the cooperative principle. 1) Both languages use locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. 2) Both apply politeness to maintain social relationships. 3) Implicature is used in both languages to convey indirect meanings. 4) Deixis in both languages depends on context for time, place, or person. 5) Both follow the cooperative principle by providing relevant and clear information. 6) Politeness is expressed in both languages, though the formality level varies. However, cultural differences influence communication styles: 1) Indonesian pronouns reflect social relationships, while English pronouns are neutral. 2) Indonesian uses formal expressions for requests, while English uses "please" in informal requests. 3) Indonesian deixis is context-dependent, whereas English is more structured. 4) Criticism in Indonesian is indirect, while English is more direct. 5) Indonesian softens commands, while English is more direct. 6) Pronouns in Indonesian reflect formality and relationship, while English pronouns are neutral. 7) Disagreement in Indonesian is indirect, while English is explicit. 8) Requests in Indonesian are framed more formally, while English requests are more direct. 9) Indonesian deixis is influenced by social context, while English uses neutral terms. 10) Indonesian uses polite requests, while English prefers direct commands. These differences reflect cultural norms and emphasize the importance of understanding these distinctions for effective communication. Teaching English pragmatics that pays attention to similarities and differences with Indonesian is important to improve effective communication. This includes understanding speech acts, principles of politeness, implicature, deixis, and principles of cooperation. Variations in language styles, cultural influences, use of idiomatic expressions, as well as sensitivity to discomfort, and gender roles in conversation also need to be taken into account. By understanding all these aspects, teaching pragmatics can help students communicate more precisely and sensitively to social and cultural contexts.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akmal, H., Syahriyani, A., & Handayani, T. (2022). Request Speech Act of Indonesian English Learners and Australian English Speakers through Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Perspectives. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 498–520.

Angelin, G. L. (2015). A Contrastive Pragmatic Study onthe Use ofThanking Expressions in English and Indonesian Movies [Thesis, Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS-UKSW]. https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/10163

Deda, N. (2013). The role of Pragmatics in English Language Teaching. Pragmatic Competence. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 63.

Dey, M. D. (2023). Four Main Characteristics of English Pragmatics. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6202

Falakhiya, I. K., & Haristiani, N. (2024). Contrastive Analysis of Complimenting Speech Acts in Japanese and Javanese. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-376-4_32

Farnia, M., & Buchheit, L. (2010). “I need to talk to you”—A contrastive pragmatic study of speech act of complaint in American English and Malaysian. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/%22I-need-to-talk-to-you%22-A-contrastive-pragmatic-of-Farnia-Buchheit/0e984f9213034cd272a769ff0b481bb625e9605b

Gultom, D. Y. P. S., Sidabutar, Y. A., Kristina, T. N., & Sitanggang, A. (2023). Contrastive Analysis Of Various Speech Events In English and Batak Toba. PIJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 1(3), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.58540/pijar.v1i3.383

Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Idris, A. A. M., & Ismail, I. N. (2023). Request modifications by Malay speakers of English in the workplace: A contrastive pragmatic analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 981–999. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.26464

Ja’afreh, N. (2023). A Pragmatic Contrastive Analysis of Apology Strategies in Jordanian Arabic and English Language. Jordan Journal of Applied Science-Humanities Series, 37(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.35192/jjoas-h.v37i2.601

Koceva, A. (2017). Contrastive analysis of the speech act of complaining in Macedonian and American English [Masters, University Goce Delcev]. https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/28254/

Lestari, D. E. (2017). Teaching Pragmatics to Indonesian Learners of English. Metathesis, 1(2), 207636. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v1i2.465

Lin, G. H. C. (2007). The Significance of Pragmatics. In Online Submission (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 91–102). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED503682

Malik, E. (2019). The English Pragmatic Competence of Indonesian English Speakers. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(3), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i3.7491

Matsukawa, C. (2024). A Contrastive Pragmatics Study of Invitations in British English and Japanese. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10113

Meiratnasari, A., Wijayanto, A., & Suparno, S. (2019). An analysis of Politeness Strategies in Indonesian English Textbooks. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v2i4.8393

Pasaribu, G. R., Daulay, S. H., & Nasution, P. T. (2022). Pragmatics Principles of English Teachers in Islamic Elementary School. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i1.29-40

Rahmawati, D. P. K. (2018). The use of person deixis between english: Donald Trump’s speeches and Indonesian: Joko Widodo’s speeches (study of contrastive analysis) [bachelorThesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, 2018]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/39063

Razzakberdiyevna, U. D. (2023). The Main Characteristics of English Pragmatics in Linguistics. Proceedings of International Educators Conference, 2(1), 639–643.

Sabuin, R. Z. (2022). Difference Between the Pragmatics of L1 & L2 English Speakers in America. 8ISC Proceedings: Arts and Education, 139–149.

Siddiqui, A. (2018). “The principle features of English Pragmatics in applied linguistics.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.77

Thayyib, M. (2014). Deixis in Bahasa Tae’ and English: A Pragmatics Contrastive Analysis. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 1(1), 73–80.

Yan, C. (2016). A contrastive pragmatic study of politeness strategies in disagreement between native speakers of English and Chinese EFL learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2016-0015




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um006v9i12025p100-124

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISLLAC indexed by:

CROSSREF SINTA GARUDA GOOGLE SCHOLAR RESEARCH BIB BASE SEARCH PKP INDEX OPENARCHIVES WORLDCAT ONESEARCH

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture
Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (Department of Indonesian Literature, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang, Indonesia)

ISSN : 2597-7385 (media online) - SK no. 0005.25977385/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.09 - 19 September 2017

Lisensi Creative Commons

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats