DIVERGENT THINKING CHARACTERISTICS IN WRITING PAPERS
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of divergent thinking in writing student papers. Characteristics of student divergent thinking are seen from the ideas expressed in a paper. This study used a qualitative approach, data were collected through documentation studies. The results of this study indicate that the characteristics of student divergent thinking in paper writing can be seen from varied ideas and have differences with other texts. These results are in accordance with the characteristics of divergent thinking, namely fluency, authenticity, flexibility, and sensitivity in detecting ideas and problems. The student connects and forms combinations of several ideas into new ideas so that sensitivity understands and responds to a statement correctly. However, students need continuous training in writing papers so that divergent thinking skills develop.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akdal, D., & Şahin, A. (2014). The Effects of Intertextual Reading Approach on the Development of Creative Writing Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 14(54), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.54.10
Aurelbach & Silverstein. (2003). Qualitative Data. New York: New York University Press.
Beetlestone, F. (2005). Creative Learning. Bandung: Nusa Media.
De Bono, E. (1976). Teaching Thinking. Diterjemahkan oleh Soemardjo. 1992. Mengajar Berpikir. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Djojosuroto, K. (2007). Filsafat Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher.
Grainger, T; Kathy G; and Andrew L. (2005). Creativity and Writing: Developing a voice and verve in the classroom. London and New York: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
İnceçay, V. (2015). Contrasting Rhetorical Patterns: Discovering Effects of First and Second Language Writing Conventions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(61), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.8
Junaedi. (2010). Menulis Kreatif: panduan penulisan ilmiah. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Nurlaela, L dan Euis I. (2015). Strategi Belajar Berpikir Kreatif. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Meissner, H. (2006). Creativity and Mathematics Education. Elementary Education Online. 5 (1):65—72.
Miles, M.B. & A. Michael Huberman. (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Diterjemahkan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. 2014. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Munandar, U. (1999). Kreativitas & Keberbakatan: Strategi mewujudkan Potensi Kreatif & Bakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Paul et al. (2008). Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods. Journal Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Vol. 2, No. 2, 68–85.
Piaw, Ch. Y. (2010). Building A Test to Assess Creative and Critical Thinking Simultaneously. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2:551—559.
Pereira, L. Q. (1999). Divergent Thinking and the Design Process. International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 224-229.
Ranjabar, J. (2017). Dasar-dasar Logika: Sebuah Langkah Awal untuk Masuk ke Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu dan Pengetahuan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Runco, M.A., and Selcuk Acar. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 1–10.
Runco, Mark A. (1986). Divergent Thinking And Creative Performance In Gifted And Nongifted Children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 375-384.
Setiawan, B. (2010). Bahasa Indonesia untuk Mahasiswa. Salatiga: Widyasari Press.
Suyitno, I. (2012). Menulis Makalah dan Artikel: teori, contoh, dan praktik perlatihan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Suyono et al. (2016). Cerdas Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Malang: Gunung Samudera.
Sowey, M. (2016). Strengthening dialogic argument: What teachers can learn from authentic examples of student dialogue. Journal of Philosophy in Schools 5(2), 54-78.
Starko, A.J. (2009). Creativity in the Classroom: Schools of Curious Delight. New York: Routledge.
Swandari, T. (2016). Pemaparan Gagasan dalam Makalah Mahasiswa. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Thamrin, M. (2017). Developing Vocational-Based Learning Materials to Write Scientific Papers to Improve the Polytechnic Students’ Academic Writing Skills in Indonesian Language Course. ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 1(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.17977/um006v1i12017p184
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford: Press.
Yeşildağ Hasançevi, F., & Günel, M. (2013). College Students’ Perceptions toward the Multi-Modal Representations and Instruction of Representations in Learning Modern Physics. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (53), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2013.53.11
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um006v3i12019p011
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISLLAC indexed by:
ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture
Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (Department of Indonesian Literature, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang, Indonesia)
ISSN : 2597-7385 (media online) - SK no. 0005.25977385/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.09 - 19 September 2017
ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License