RANCANGAN SCAFFOLDING BERDASARKAN HASIL TES KEMAMPUAN GEOMETRI SISWA SMP DITINJAU DARI PERLUASAN TEORI VAN HIELE
Abstract
The ability of geometry is an aspect that underlies students to solve geometry problems. Several studies have stated students' difficulties in learning geometry. There are five levels of expansion of Van Hiele's theory, namely level 0, level 0.5, level 1, level 1.5, and level 2 which are used to measure the geometry abilities of junior high school students. Students' low geometry skills can be improved through scaffolding, so an appropriate scaffolding design is needed. This study aims to describe the appropriate scaffolding design based on the geometry ability test of junior high school students in terms of the expansion of Van Hiele's theory. The research subjects in this study consisted of 3 students of class VIII of SMP Negeri 8 Malang divided into 3 different levels of geometry ability, namely level 0, 0.5, and 1. Data collection methods consisted of written tests and interviews. The results showed that students at level 1 needed scaffolding to be able to connect the properties between quadrilateral shapes. Students at level 0.5 require scaffolding in the form of conceptual understanding of prerequisite materials. While students at level 0 need scaffolding to minimize the prototype phenomenon.
Keywords
Full Text:
[Download PDF]References
Adolphus, T. 2011. Problems of Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(2): 143-152.
Connolly, S. 2010. The Impact of Van Hiele-Based Geometry Instruction on Student Understanding. Mathematical and Computing Sciences Department, Paper 97.
Riastuti, N., Mardiyana, dan Pramudya, I. 2017. Analysis of Students Geometry Skills Viewed from Spatial Intelligence. International Conference and Workshop on Mathematical Analysis and its Application 1913, 020024-1 - 020024-4.
NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Pittalis, M., dan Christou, C. 2010. Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
(2): 191–212.
Jane, K., Brown, M., Taylor, R., dan Hirst, A. 2004. Developing Geometrical Reasoning, Preceeding of the 27th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (MERGA27), 1: 127-134.
Lawson, M. J., dan Chinnappan, M. 2000. Knowledge Connectedness in Geometry Problem Solving, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1): 26-43.
Sevenye, W. C., dan Robinson R. S. 2004. Qualitative Research Issues and Methods: An Introduction for Educatioal Techologists. Arizone State University, Northern Illinois University.
Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., dan Peterson, B. E. 2011. Mathematics for Elementary Teachers A Contemporary Approach (Ninth Edition). United State of America: Wiley.
Fujita, T. 2012. Learners' level of understanding of the inclusion relation of quadrilaterals and prototype phenomenon, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31: 60-72.
Anwar, Yuwono, I. Irawan, E.B., dan As'ari, A.R. 2017. Investigation of Contingency Patterns of Teachers’ Scaffolding in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1): 65-76.
Slavin, R.E. 2006. Educational Psychology Theory and Practice (Eighth Edition). United States of America: Pearson.
Saye, J. W., dan Brush, T. 2002. Scaffolding Critical Reasoning Abuot History and Social Isuues in Multimedia-Supported Learning Environments. ERT&D, 50(3): 77-96.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um076v3i12019p50-57
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Fashihah Fashihah, Gatot Muhsetyo, Abd. Qohar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JKPM Indexed By:

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License