ANALISIS PROBLEM POSING SISWA DITINJAU DARI TAKSONOMI BLOOM

Saddam Hussen; Abdur Rahman Asari; Tjang Daniel Chandra

doi:10.17977/um076v1i22017p119-126

ANALISIS PROBLEM POSING SISWA DITINJAU DARI TAKSONOMI BLOOM

Saddam Hussen, Abdur Rahman Asari, Tjang Daniel Chandra

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the analysis of problem posing students in terms of taxonomy bloom. Mathematical material that is chosen is a square and a triangle. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive research. This study was conducted in one of the SMP Negeri Malang, with research subjects IX class consisting of 32 students. Researchers gave math tests to be analyzed based on blooms taxonomy, and researcher mengkategorisasikannya by high-level thinking skills or Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and low-level thinking skills or Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS). The results of this study indicate that: (1) 96.875% of the 32 students to questions categorized remembering, understanding, and applying, therefore the students included LOTS. (2) there is one category of students including analyzing, it means the student has included HOTS.

Full Text:

[Download PDF]

References

Akay, H. & Boz, N. (2009). Prospective teachers’ Views About Problem-Posing Activities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1.(Online), 1192–1198. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042809002183, diakses 29 Juni 2016).

Arslan, C., & Altun, M. (2007). Learning To Solve Non-routine Mathematical Problems. Elementary Education Online.(Online), 6(1): 50-61.( http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol6say1/v6s1m5.pdf, diakses 01 Januari 2016).

As’ari, A. R. 2000. Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Problem Posing. Jurnal Pelangi Pendidikan. 2(2).

Bouchard, G, J. (2011). In Full Bloom: Helping Students Grow Using the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education. (Online), 22(4),(http://www2.paeaonline.org/index.php?ht=action/GetDocumentAction/i/133342, diakses 01 Januari 2016).

Cresswell, J.W. 2014. Research Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Christou, C., Mousoulides, N,, Pittalis, M., Pitta, D., & Sriraman, B. 2005. An Empirical Taxonomy of Problem Posing Processes. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast.(Online), 37 (3).(http://miwalab.cog.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp/database/paper/2006-12-19.pdf, diakses 12 Februari 2015).

Dori, Y.J & Herscovitz, O. 1999. Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.(Online), 36(4): 411-430,( http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4%3C411::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;2-E/abstract , diakses 24 Mei 2016).

English, L. D. 1998. Children’s Problem Posing Within Formal and Informal Context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.(Online), 29(1): 83-106, (http://www.nctm.org/publications/journal-for-research-in-mathematics-education/), diakses 25 November 2014.

Ghasempour, Z., Bakar, N. & Jahanshahloo. 2013. Innovation in Teaching and Learning through Problem Posing Tasks and Metacognitive Strategies. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations. (online), (1): 53-62,(http://www.uob.edu.bh/uobfiles/685/v.1issue9.pdf), diakses 3 Januari 2016.

Gunawan, H. 2008. Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dalam matematika SMP. Pdf. (Online), ( http://personal.fmipa.itb.ac.id/hgunawan/files/2011/04/developing-higherorder-thinking-skills.pdf diakses 13 Juni 2016).

Heong, Y. M, Widad B. O, Jailani B. M. Y, Tee T.K, Razali B. H, and Mimi M.B.M. 2011. The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 1, No. 2.

Ismaimuza, D. 2011. Creative Thinking Ability on Mathematics of Junior High School in Palu Based on School Levels. International Seminar and the Fourth National Conference on Mathematics Education 2011 “Building the Nation Character through Humanistic Mathematics Education”.Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, July 21-23 2011. (http://eprints.uny.ac.id/920/1/P%20-%206.pdf, diakses 29 Januari 2016)

Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J.2004. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher.(Online), 33(7):14-26. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/3700093. , diakse 24 Desember 2015).

Kadir dan Masi, L. 2014. Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills Of Students Junior High School In Kendari City. International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 1 ISIM-MED 2014 “Innovation and Technology for Mathematics and Mathematics Education” Department of Mathematics Education,Yogyakarta State UniversityYogyakarta. (Online). (http://eprints.uny.ac.id/24314/1/E-35.pdf , diakses 09 Februari 2016)

Kolovou, A., Panhuizen M, H., & Bakker, A. 2009. Non-Routine Problem Solving Tasks in Primary School Mathematics Textbooks – A Needle in a Haystack. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.(Online), 8(2):31-68. (http://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/staff/marjah/download/Kolovou-vdHeuvel-Bakker_2009_MJRME_textbook-analysis-problemsolving.pdf, diakses 01 Februari 2016.

Misra, S. & Iyer, S. 2015. An exploration of problem posing-based activities as an assessment tool and as an instructional strategy.Research and Practice in Techology Enhanced Learning. (online), (http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~sri/papers/problemPosing-rptel2015.pdf), diakses 8 Januari 2016.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for Schools Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Norman, I. & Bakar, M.N. 2011. Secondary School Students’ Problem Posing Strategies: Implications To Secondary School Students’ Problem Posing Performances

Pujiadi, Kartono & Asikin, M. 2015. Influence Of Creative Problem Solving Aided With Interactive Compact Disk Towards Mathematics Learning Achievement Of Grade X Students. International Journal of Education and Research.(Online), 3(3) (http://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/March-2015/51.pdf, diakses 29 Februari 2016)

Ramos, J, L., Dolipas, B, B., & Villamor, B, B. 2013. Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research.(Online),4:48-60. (http://www.auamii.com/jiir/vol-01/issue-04/5ramos.pdf, diakses 14 Februari 2016)

Rosnawati. (2005). Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Mengembangkan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Makalah. Disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional.

Seacrest, D, E. 2011. Children's Voices: Students' Attitudes about Routine and Nonroutine Mathematics. Theses, Student Research, and Creative Activity: Department of Teaching , Learning and Teacher Education.(Online (http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=teachlearnstudent, diakses 16 Februari 2016)

Sembiring, R, K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. 2008. Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. ZDM Mathematics Education. 40:927–939. doi 10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9

Silver. & Cai, J. 1996. An Analysis of Arithmetic Problem Posing by Middle School Student. Journal For Research in Mathematics Education.(Online), 2(75):521-539. (http://www.nctm.org/publications/journal-for-research-in-mathematics-education/, diakses 09 Februari 2016)

Wang, V. & Farmer, L. 2008. Adult Teaching Methods in China and Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. (Online), 2( 2) (http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1107&context=ij-sotl, diakases 12 Januari 2016)

Winarso, W. 2014. Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika Tingkat Tinggi Melalui Pendekatan Induktif, Deduktif dan Induktif-Deduktif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Eduacation Mathematics.(Online), 3(2): 95-118. (http://web.iaincirebon.ac.id/files/journals/2/articles/18/public/18-68-1-PB.pdf , diakses 14 Juni 2016).

Woodward, J., dkk. 2012. Improving mathematical problem-solving in Grades 4 through 8: A practice guide. Washington, D.C.:National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Yazgan, Y. 2015. Sixth graders and non-routine problems: Which strategies are decisive for success. Educational Research and Reviews.(Online), 10(13):1807-1816. doi: 10.5897/ERR2015.2230

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um076v1i22017p119-126