ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA KELAS VII DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL GEOMETRI

Fahrur Rozi Hadiyanto, Hery Susanto, Abd. Qohar

Abstract


Geometry is one of the most important branches of mathematics. At the junior high school level there are several geometry materials taught, including triangles and quadrilaterals. However, in the field, it was found that many students still made mistakes in solving geometry problems. Errors are deviations from the correct solution of a problem, both conceptually and in the procedure for solving it. Errors in solving geometry problems can be used as a reference to find out what difficulties are made by students. One of the efforts in helping students who have difficulty in solving geometry problems is by analyzing the results of students' completion of the problems given. The purpose of this study was to determine the types and causes of student errors in solving geometry problems. This study used a qualitative approach by using a test question instrument. The subjects of this study were 3 of 33 students of class VII A MTs Surya Buana Malang. From the results of the analysis of student answers and interviews conducted, it was obtained data that the types of errors made by students included: conceptual errors, procedural errors and errors in understanding the questions. Conceptual errors made by students include: error types of triangles, properties of quadrilaterals, definitions of quadrilaterals, concepts of operations on numbers, and concepts of perimeter and area of triangles and quadrilaterals. Procedural errors made by students are errors in giving units of circumference or area and calculation errors. And errors in understanding the problem. While the causes of these errors include students who are less able to distinguish between angles and line segments, are less able to distinguish types of triangles based on angles and based on sides, do not understand the concept of operations on numbers, are less precise, do not understand the difference in area and the number of angles in triangles, lack of variety of questions. given by the teacher and do not understand the perimeter and area of a quadrilateral.


Keywords


error analysis; understanding; solving geometry

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Amiripour, P., Amir-Mofidi, S., & Shahvarani, A. 2012. Scaffolding as Effective Method for Mathematics Learning.Indian Journal of Science and Technology. Vol.5, No.9.

Anghileri, J. 2006. Scaffolding Pactices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol.9, halaman 33-52.

Brown, J., Skow, K., & the IRIS center. 2016. Mathematics: Identifying and Addressing Student Erros. (Online). (http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/case_studies/ics_matherr.pdf) diakses februari 2017.

Christmas, D., Kudzai, C., & Josiah, M. 2013. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development Theory, What are Its Implications for Mathematical Teaching?.Greener Journal of Social Sciences. Great Zimbabwe University: Department of Educational Foundations. Vol.3(7), pp 371-377

Ellis, R. 1987. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hadiyanto, F. R., Susanto, H., & Qohar, A. 2016. Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VII Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pembelajarannya dengan Tema “ Tren Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Abad 21” pada tanggal 13 Agustus 2016 di Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UM.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2011. Salinan Lampiran Permendikbud No. 68 Tahun 2013 Tentang Kurikulum SMP-MTs.Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Kurniasari, E. 2013. Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Materi Dimensi Tiga Kelas XI IPA SMA. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika dengan Tema “Penguatan Peran Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika untuk Indonesia yang Lebih Baik” pada Tanggal 9 November 2013 di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY.

Kurniati, D. 2010. Analisi Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Puger dalam Menyelesaikan Soal yang Berkaitan dengan Persegi Panjang dan Persegi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika “Pengembangan Wawasan Penelitian Matematika Sekolah Mathematics Education Community Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana UM 2010.

Mirza, A. 1998. Analisis Kesalahan Belajar Matematika. Pontianak : FKIP UNTAN.

Nolting, P. D. 2008. Math Study Skills Workbook, Fourth Edition: Your Guide to Reducing Test Anxiety and Improving Study Strategies.Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.

Ozerem, A. 2012.Misconceptions in Geometry and Suggested Solutions for Seventh Grade Students. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1( 4),23 - 35

Padmavathy, R. D. 2015. Diagnostic of Errors Committed by 9th Grade Students in Solving Problems in Geometry. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE)

Parera, J.D. 1987. Linguistik Edukasional: Pendekatan, Konsep, dan Teori Pengajaran Bahasa. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. 1988. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia.

Roselizawati, S., & Shahrill, M. 2014. Understandig Students’ Mathematical Errors And Missconceptions: The Case of Year 11 Repeating Students. Mathematics Education Trends and Research. Vol 2014, doi:10.5889/2014/metr-00051.

Saini, M. 2015. A Diagnostic Study of Errors Commited by 8th Grade Students of Government School in Solving Problems of Geometry. International Journal in Management and Social Science. Vol.3 issue 7.

Sandhu, D. 2013. Does anyone have any information on the differences between misconceptions and errors in mathematics.Research Gate., (Online), (http://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_anyone_have_any_information_on_the_differences_between_misconceptions_and_errors_in_mathematics), diakses 6 Maret 2016

Usiskin, Z. 1982. Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry.(Final Report of The Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project). Chicago: University of Chicago

Vygotski, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society : The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Westwood, P. 2004. Learning and Learning Difficulties :A Handbook for Teachers. Australian Council for Educational Research: Acer Press

Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. 1976. The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 17. PP 89-100.

Young, R., & O’Shea, T. 1981. Errors in Children’s Subtraction. Cognitive Science, 5(2): 152-177.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um076v3i12019p24-33

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Fahrur Rozi Hadiyanto, Hery Susanto, Abd. Qohar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JKPM Indexed By:

        

 



Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License

View My Stats