DESKRIPSI KESALAHAN STRUKTUR BERPIKIR SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI SERTA DEFRAGMENTINGNYA: SUATU STUDI KASUS

Taufiq Hidayanto, Subanji Subanji, Erry Hidayanto

Abstract


It is revealed that as a compulsory mathematic subject for junior high school students, most students are struggling to solve geometric problem. As an effort to fix this condition, this article describes mistakes of junior high school students’ structural thinking in solving geometric problem. Subjects’ mistake were assessed by Subanji’s (2015) theory of conceptual construction mistake and mathematical problem solving. Researcher then defragmented subjects’ thinking structure in order to solve problems effectively. The result shows that subjects experienced miss logical construction and construction gap. Miss logical construction occurred because students’ logical mistake in solving the problem, while the construction gap happened due to certain incomplete schemes in subjects’ problem solving thinking structure. Defragmenting was conducted by assessing mistakenly constructed scheme. Then, unconstructed scheme was revealed. When scheme had considered as sufficient, the constructed scheme were knitted into an interconnected scheme and subjects’ thinking structure became complete. Decomposition of incorrect structured schemes used cognitive conflict, while scheme and scheme knitting applied scaffolding.


Full Text:

[Download PDF]

References


Biber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S.. 2013. The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2): 50 – 59.

Chinnappan, M. & Thomas, M. 2003. Teachers’ Function Schemas and their Role in Modelling. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15 (2): 151-170.

Chinnappan, M. 1998. The Accessing of Geometry Schemas by High School Students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1a (2): 27-45.

Chinnappan, M. 2003. Schema Construction among Pre-service Teachers and the Use of IT in Mathematics Teaching: A Case Study. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 5 (2003): 32-44.

Das, R. & Das, G.C. 2013. Math Anxiety: The Poor Problem Solving Factor in School Mathematics. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3 (4): 1 – 5.

Derry, S. J. 1996. Cognitive Schema Theory in the Constructivist Debate. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4): 163 – 174 .

Hershkovitz, S. & Nesher, P. 2003. The Role of Schemes in Solving Word Problems. The Mathematics Educator, 7(2): 1 – 24.

Hidayanto, T. & Subanji. 2015. Pemberian Contoh Analogi untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Siswa. J-TEQIP, VI (2): 156-162.

Hoon, T.S., Singh, P., Han, C.T., & Kee, K.L. 2013. Heuristic approach experience in solving mathematical problems. Educational Research, 4(8): 607-611. (Online), (http://www.interesjournals.org/full-articles/heuristic-approach-experience-in-solving-mathematical-problems.pdf?view=inline), diakses 4 April 2015.

Lajoie, S.P. 2005. Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33 (2005): 541–557.

Lester, F.K. 2013. Thoughts About Research On Mathematical Problem- Solving Instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10 (1&2): 245-278.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. US: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Nunokawa, K. 2005. Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: What we expect students to obtain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24 (2005):325–340.

Nusantara, T. & Subanji. 2015. Defragmenting Proses Berpikir Matematik melalui Pemetaan Kognitif untuk Memperbaiki Kesalahan Matematika Siswa. Laporan Hibah Penelitian Pascasarjana (Hibah Pasca) UM. Malang: Lemlit UM.

Öllinger, M. & Goel, V. 2010. Problem Solving. Dalam B.M. Glatzeder, et al. (Eds.), Towards a Theory of Thinking (hlm. 3 – 21), Berlin: Springer.

Reiser, B.J. 2004. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.

Stacey, K. (k.stacey@unimelb.edu.au). 31 Desember 2015. Research & Literature on Problem Solving in Geometry. E-mail kepada Taufiq Hidayanto (taufiqhidayanto749@gmail.com).

Subanji. 2011. Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasional. Malang: UM Press.

Subanji. 2013. Pembelajaran Matematika Kreatif dan Inovatif. Malang: UM Press.

Subanji. 2015. Teori Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Malang: UM Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um076v1i12017p72-81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Taufiq Hidayanto, Subanji Subanji, Erry Hidayanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JKPM Indexed By:

        

 



Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License

View My Stats