2.png)
1.png)
1.png)
1.png)
4.png)
1.png)
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
Email this article Study on Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on Surface Roughness and Tensile Strength Using Analysis of Variance
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling of 3D printing is the process of making workpieces or parts by adding filaments to each layer. Some indicators of a high-quality product of 3D printing are the precisions dimensions, the surface roughness, and tensile strength. This research aims to find the parameters most affecting surface roughness and tensile strength. The research design used an experimental method with input parameters: (1) print speed (15-35 mm/s), (2) print temperature (200-210°C), (3) layer height (0.1 – 0.3 mm), (4) infill line directions (0-90°), and dependent variables were surface roughness and tensile strength. The data distribution used the L9 orthogonal array, and the statistic analysis used ANOVA. Material uses nanographite-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) filament. The results indicate that print parameters that significantly affect surface roughness are layer height and infill line directions. The best surface roughness on the layer height parameter is 0.1 mm, and the infill line directions parameter is 90°. Based on ANOVA analysis, print speed, print temperature, and layer height do not significantly affect tensile strength, but infill line directions significantly affect tensile strength. The best tensile strength on infill line directions is 90°. The best average tensile strength with nanographite-reinforced PLA filament is 38.56 N/mm2, with 35 m/s print speed, 205 °C print temperature, 0.1 mm layer height, and 90° infill line direction parameter. The best average surface roughness with nanographite-reinforced PLA filament is 0.66 µm, with 35 m/s print speed, 205 °C print temperature, 0.1 mm layer height, and 90° infill line direction parameter.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
S. Farah, D. G. Anderson, and R. Langer, “Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications — A comprehensive review,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., vol. 107, pp. 367–392, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012.
D. S. Thomas and S. W. Gilbert, “Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing: A literature review and discussion,” Gaithersburg (USA): National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp. 1–96, 2015.
S. Wickramasinghe, T. Do, and P. Tran, “FDM-Based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–42, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12071529.
H. Wu and T. T. Chen, “Quality control problems in 3D printing manufacturing : A review,” Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 607-614, 2018, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2017-0031.
G. Percoco, L. Arleo, G. Stano, and F. Bottiglione, “Analytical model to predict the extrusion force as a function of the layer height, in extrusion based 3D printing,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 38, no. July 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101791.
R. I. Campbell, M. Martorelli, and H. S. Lee, “Surface roughness visualisation for rapid prototyping models,” CAD Comput. Aided Des., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 717–725, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00201-9.
E. Taşcıoğlu, Ö. Kıtay, A. Ö. Keskin, and Y. Kaynak, “Effect of printing parameters and post‑process on surface roughness and dimensional deviation of PLA parts fabricated by extrusion‑based 3D printing,” J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 44, p. 139, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03429-7.
G. K. Sharma, A. K. Johar, T. B. Kumar, and D. Boolchandani, “Effectiveness of Taguchi and ANOVA in design of differential ring oscillator,” Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 331–341, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10470-020-01671-4.
K. V. Sabarish, J. Baskar, and P. Paul, “Overview on L9 taguchi optimizational method,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 652–658, 2019, doi: 10.34218/IJARET.10.2.2019.062.
S. Anand Kumar and Y. Shivraj Narayan, Tensile testing and evaluation of 3D-printed PLA specimens as per ASTM D638 type IV standard, no. February 2018. Springer Singapore, 2019.
D. Taqdissillah, A. Z. Muttaqin, M. Darsin, D. Dwilaksana, and N. Ilminnafik, “The Effect of Nozzle Temperature, Infill Geometry, Layer Height and Fan Speed on Roughness Surface in PETG Filament,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 74, 2022, doi: 10.17977/um016v6i22022p074.
I. Buj-Corral, X. Sánchez-Casas, and C. J. Luis-Pérez, “Analysis of am parameters on surface roughness obtained in PLA parts printed with FFF technology,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/polym13142384.
T. Yao, J. Ye, Z. Deng, K. Zhang, Y. Ma, and H. Ouyang, “Tensile failure strength and separation angle of FDM 3D printing PLA material: Experimental and theoretical analyses,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 188, no. November 2019, p. 107894, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107894.
M. Syaifuddin and H. Suryanto, “The Effect of Multi-Extrusion Process of Polylactic Acid on Tensile Strength and Fracture Morphology of Filament Product,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2021, doi: 10.17977/um016v5i12021p06.
T. Yao, Z. Deng, K. Zhang, and S. Li, “A method to predict the ultimate tensile strength of 3D printing polylactic acid (PLA) materials with different printing orientations,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 163, no. July 2018, pp. 393–402, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025.
S. R. Rajpurohit and H. K. Dave, “Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 101, pp. 1525–1536, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3047-x.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um016v7i22023p096
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats