Developing and Validating Instrument for Online History Learning Oriented towards Historical Empathy based on the CIPP Evaluation

Labibatussolihah Labibatussolihah; Nour Muhammad Adriani; Nurdiani Fathiraini

doi:10.17977/um025v7i32023p116

Developing and Validating Instrument for Online History Learning Oriented towards Historical Empathy based on the CIPP Evaluation

Labibatussolihah Labibatussolihah, Nour Muhammad Adriani, Nurdiani Fathiraini

Abstract

The international crisis as the Covid-19 global health emergency has emphasized the need to strengthen social values such as empathy. Meanwhile, online learning during the pandemic created new challenges for teachers in instilling social values and norms, including in history subjects. This study aims to develop an evaluation instrument for historical learning oriented toward cultivating historical empathy. Using the CIPP framework from Stufflebeam, academics (lecturers) and education practitioners (teachers) developed a set of questionnaires and tested them on 259 high school students in Bandung. Some conclusions that can be drawn include (1) the existing instruments are acceptable based on standard factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha >0.7; (2) teachers tend not to include the element of empathy in learning history; (3) the context (C) and process (P) aspects of history learning based on historical empathy are still low compared to the input (I) and product (P) aspects.

Keywords

instrument development; online learning; history; empathy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adriani, N.M. & Labibatussolihah. 2021. Arsip Covid-19 sebagai Media Pendayagunaan Modal Sosial dan Pembangunan Kohesivitas Kebangsaan dan Global Melalui Context-based Learning pada Masa Pandemi dan Pasca-pandemi. Prosiding KongresNasional Sejarah XI, 8 November 2021.

Afandi, R. 2011. Integrasi Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Pembelajaran IPS Di Sekolah Dasar. Pedagogia, 1(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v1i1.32

Arifin, Z. 2017. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berman, E.A. 2017. An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Researchers’ Data Management Practices at UVM: Integrated Findings to Develop Research Data Services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 6(1): e1104. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2017.1104.

Brooks, S. 2011. Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(2), 166-202.

Bryant, D. & Clark, P. 2006. Historical empathy and Canada: “A people’s history”. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(4), 1039-1063.

Creswell, J.W. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Cunningham, D.L. 2007. Understanding pedagogical reasoning in history teaching through the case of cultivating empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(4), 592-630.

Dabbagh, N. 2007. The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217- 226.

Davis, O. 2001. In pursuit of historical empathy. In O. Davis, Yeager, E., & Foster, S. (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.

De Leur, T., Boxtel, C.V. & Wilschut, A. 2017. ‘I Saw Angry People and Broken Statues’: Historical Empathy in Secondary History Education, British Journal of Educational Studies, 65:3, 331-352, DOI:

1080/00071005.2017.1291902

Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. 2021. COVID-19 and education: The lingering effects of unfinished learning. McKinsey Report. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/educat ion/our-insights/covid-19-and-education-the-lingering-effects-of-unfinished-learning

Drake, F.D., & McBride, L.W. 1997. Reinvigorating the Teaching of History through Alternative Assessment. The History Teacher, 30(2), 145. doi:10.2307/494571

Dulberg, N. 2002. Engaging in history: Empathy and perspective-taking in children’s historical thinking. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, April 1-5, 2002.

Edmunds, J.A. 2006. How to Assess Student Performance in History: Going beyond Multiple-Choice Tests. Greensboro: The Serve Center University of North Carolina.

Eisenberg, N. 2000. Empathy. In K. E. Alan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3) (179-182). Washington, D.C.

Endacott, J.L. 2010. Reconsidering affective engagement in historical empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 6-49.

Endacott, J., & Brooks, S. 2013. An Updated Theoretical and Practical Model for Promoting Historical Empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8, 41-58.

Fajar Pendidikan. 2021. Daftar mata pelajaran dalam kurikulum prototipe 2022. https://www.fajarpendidikan.co.id/daftar-mata-pelajarannya-dalam-kurikulum-prototipe/

Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A. & Creswell, J.W. 2013. “Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs - Principles and Practices.” Health Services Research 48(6pt2): 2134-2156. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Grant, S.G. 2001. It’s just the facts, or is it? The relationship between teachers’ practices and students’ understanding of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(4). 63-108.

Gehlbach, H. 2004. Social perspective taking: A facilitating aptitude for conflict resolution, historical empathy, and social studies achievement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 32(1), 39-55.

Gillet-Swan, J. 2017. The Challenges of Online Learning Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30.

Hoffman, M.L. 1984. Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (103-131). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Jie, C-Y. & Ali, N.M. 2021. COVID-19: What are the challenges of online learning? A literature reviews. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 23, 23-29.

Kohlmeier, J. 2006. “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world history course. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(1), 34-57.

Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bustamante, M.N., & Nelson, J.A. 2010. “Mixed Research as a Tool for Developing Quantitative Instruments.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(1): 56-78. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805

Santika, I.W.E. 2020. Pendidikan Karakter pada Pembelajaran Daring. Indonesian Values and Character Education Journal, 3(1), 9-19.

Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. 2007. Evaluation: theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Susanti, S. 2020. Praktik Pembelajaran Sejarah Pada Masa Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ). HISTORIS, 5(2), 102-106.

Tierney, R.D. 2013. Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003

World Bank. 2020. The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital in the Time of COVID-19, World Bank Publication, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34432

Yuzulia, I. 2021. The Challenges of Online Learning During Pandemic: Students’ Voice. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.31294/w.v12i1

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um025v7i32023p116