ANALISIS PROSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN PENGHAPUSAN PEMBELAJARAN CALISTUNG PADA KELAS RENDAH SEKOLAH DASAR

Maulana Amirul Adha; Asep Sunandar; Nova Syafira Ariyanti

doi:10.17977/um025v3i32019p124

ANALISIS PROSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN PENGHAPUSAN PEMBELAJARAN CALISTUNG PADA KELAS RENDAH SEKOLAH DASAR

Maulana Amirul Adha, Asep Sunandar, Nova Syafira Ariyanti

Abstract

Abstract : The purpose of this study was to describe the prospect policy, forecast future policy, and compile policy recommendations of the elimination of “calistung” learning policies in the lower classes of elementary schools in Malang city. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative. This study analyzed using the public policy prospective analysis theory from Dunn. This research in collecting data using interview techniques, and study reference. The key informant is the principal and additional informants namely the teacher and parents of students. The findings of the study are (1) The core of the substantive problem of policy is the problem of skills student and school curriculum; (2) The results of policy forecasting show the competitiveness of students towards “calistung” is slow; and (3) Policy recommendations made by the education authorities should immediately formulate policy guidelines, and schools can get around the “calistung” program by inserting on character building or educational games.

Abstrak : Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan prospek kebijakan, meramalkan masa depan kebijakan, dan menyusun rekomendasi kebijakan penghapusan pembelajaran calistung pada kelas rendah sekolah dasar di kota Malang. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Penelitian ini melakukan analisis menggunakan teori analisis prospektif kebijakan publik dari Dunn. Penelitian ini dalam pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik wawancara, dan kajian kepustakaan. Key Informan yakni kepala sekolah dan informan tambahan yakni guru dan orang tua siswa. Temuan dari penelitianyakni (1) Inti permasalahan substantif kebijakan yaitu masalah kecakapan dan kurikulum sekolah; (2) Hasil peramalan kebijakan menunjukkan daya cakap siswa terhadap calistung lambat; dan (3) Rekomendasi kebijakan dilakukan dinas pendidikan seyogyanya segera menyusun panduan kebijakan, serta sekolah dapat menyiasati program calistung dengan menyisipkan pada pembinaan karakter atau permainan edukasi.

Keywords

Analisis Prospektif; Kebijakan Publik; Calistung Pendidikan Dasar; Prospective Analysis; Public Policy; “Calistung”; Elementary School

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, P. 2015. Education Policy: Explaining, Framing, and Forming. Journal of Education Policy, 31 (3), 290-307.

Calistung Kelas 1-2 SD Dihapus, Ada yang Khawatir. JPNN.Com (Online), (https://www.jpnn.com/news/calistung-kelas-1-2-sd-dihapus-ada-yang-khawatir). Diakses 1 Mei 2019.

Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. 2016. Play-Based Mathematics Activities as a Resource for Changing Educator Attitudes and Practice.SAGE Open, 6(2), 1-14.

Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th Edition. London: Sage Publication.

Cullinan, B. E. 2000. Independent Reading and School Achievement.School Library Media Research, 3 (1), 1–24.

Damayanti, S.N. 2017. Analisis Prospektif Kebijakan Pengalihan Kewenangan Pendidikan Menengah dari Pemerintah Kota Surabaya ke Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur Berdasarkan UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 5 (3), 1-12.

Dunn, W.N. 2000. Public Policy Analysis, An Introduction. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Guven, S., Ozturk, A., & Duman, S.N. 2016. Needs analysis of responsibility curriculum for primary school students.Educational Research and Reviews, 11(19). 1831–1840.

Hwa, S. P. 2018. Pedagogical change in mathematics learning.Educational Technology and Society, 21 (4), 259–276.

Kapan Waktu yang Tepat Bagi Anak Belajar Calistung?. Educenter.id (Online), (https://www.educenter.id /belajar-calistung/amp/). Diakses 1 Mei 2019.

Katmada, A., Mavridis, A., & Tsiatsos, T. 2014. Implementing a game for supporting learning in mathematics.Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12 (3), 230–242.

Knoepfel, P. 2007. Public Policy Analysis. UK: The Policy Press University of Bristol.

Lundy, L. 2012. Children’s Rights and Educational Policy in Europe: The Implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of The Child. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (4), 393-411.

Sahlberg, P. 2007. Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach.Journal of Education Policy, 22 (2), 147–171.

Saniy, M.M.A. 2014. Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SD Negeri Sampangan 02 Semarang yang Mendapat Calistung dan Tidak Mendapat Calistung di Taman Kanak-Kanak. Educational Psychology Journal, 3 (1), 14-18.

Stokey, E. 2009. A Primer For Policy Analysis. USA: W.W Norton & Company.

Tahun Ajaran Baru, Pemkot Malang Bakal Uji Coba Kurikulum Pendidikan Karakter dan Penghapusan Calistung. Malangtimes.com (Online), (https://www.malangtimes.com/baca/37744/20190403/143400/tahun-ajaran-baru-pemkot-malang-bakal-uji-coba-kurikulum-pendidikan-karakter-dan-penghapusan-calistung). Diakses 1 Mei 2019.

Ulfatin, N. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.

Whitten, C., Labby, S., & Sullivan, S. L. 2016. The impact of Pleasure Reading on Academic Success.The Journal of Multidisciplinary Graduate Research, 2 (4), 48–64.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um025v3i32019p124