KONTRIBUSI SISTEM AMONG TERHADAP INKLUSI SOSIAL: STUDI KASUS DI SD TAMANSISWA YOGYAKARTA
Abstract
THE AMONG SYSTEM'S CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIAL INCLUSION: CASE STUDY AT TAMANSISWA YOGYAKARTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Tamansiswa’s among system is a unique teaching model. The teaching model belongs to the family of non-directive. In practice, the among system is founded on Tamansiswa's philosophy and belief about the development of students’ knowledge and character, allowing them to be free to explore their surroundings. So far, the among system has helped to establish both theoretical and practical frameworks for social inclusion. However, the among system has received little attention because it is only used in private schools, which the community considers to be less legitimate. This study aims to investigate the why and how among system contributes to social inclusion. In-depth interviews, participatory observation, recording, and anecdotal notes were used to collect data, which was subsequently validated via triangulation. Data were then analyzed following the procedure introduced by Miles. Based on this analysis, the following important findings are highlighted: (a) the among system promotes Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI), (b) the among system prioritizes the fulfillment of children’s rights to receive adequate education and development services over academic knowledge, and (c) the among system employs the humanism-constructivism paradigm (avoiding behaviorism). Practically, this foundation is manifested by the teacher by making friends with students based on the norms of politeness, respecting the child’s natural traits, and supervising the child in exercising his or her freedom (both freedom of thought, speech, and action). The findings of this study have significance for the necessity for the adoption of the among system in social studies course in order to develop social studies learning that is based on genuine experiences in a social environment (contextual). This study's findings also contribute to the development of core concepts for implementing the Fun School Movement, culture-based schools, and schools for children with special needs.
Sistem among merupakan suatu model pengajaran yang khas perguruan Tamansiswa. Model pengajaran tersebut termasuk dalam rumpun model pengajaran non direktif. Dalam praktiknya, sistem among didasarkan kepada falsafah dan keyakinan Tamansiswa tentang perkembangan pengetahuan dan budi pekerti pelajar, agar mereka merdeka dalam mengenal dunianya. Selama ini, sistem among menyumbang kerangka teoretik maupun praktik terhadap pembangunan inklusi sosial. Namun sampai saat ini sistem among kurang diteliti karena hanya terselenggara di sekolah swasta yang oleh masyarakat dianggap kurang bonafit. Riset ini berusaha menelaah mengapa dan bagaimana kontribusi sistem among terhadap inklusi sosial secara detail dan mendalam. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dokumentasi, dan catatan anekdot, kemudian divalidasi melalui triangulasi. Data yang sahih dianalisis mengikuti prosedur yang diperkenalkan Miles. Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, riset ini menyoroti temuan penting berikut: (a) sistem among mempromosikan Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI), (b) alih-alih memprioritaskan pengetahuan akademik, sistem among memprioritaskan pemenuhan hak anak untuk mendapat layanan pendidikan yang layak dan pengembangan budi pekerti, dan (c) sistem among menggunakan paradigma humanisme-konstruktivisme (menghindari pola-pola behavioristik). Secara praktis, landasan tersebut dimanifestasikan guru dengan menjalin pertemanan dengan siswa berdasarkan norma kesopanan, menghormati kodrat alamiah anak, dan mengawasi anak dalam menggunakan kebebasannya (baik kebebasan berpikir, berucap, maupun bertindak). Temuan riset ini berimplikasi kepada perlunya adopsi sistem among dalam pembelajaran IPS agar tercipta pembelajaran IPS berbasis pengalaman riil di lingkungan sosial (kontekstual). Temuan riset ini juga berkontribusi kepada penambahan dasar-dasar pelaksanaan Gerakan Sekolah Menyenangkan (GSM), sekolah berbasis kebudayaan, dan sekolah yang mendidik anak berkebutuhan khusus.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan validitas aitem. Buletin Psikologi, 3(1), 19–26.
Beckett, A. E. (2014). Non-disabled children’s ideas about disability and disabled people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(6), 856–875.
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Citizens, B. E. (2008). A vision of powerful teaching and learning in the social studies. Social Education, 72(5), 277–280.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction publishers.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, J. S. M. B. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Khoiron, M., & Wahyuningtyas, N. (2020). Revitalization of Social studies education: A developmental study based on dick and carey instructional design. International Conference on Social Studies and Environmental Issues (ICOSSEI 2019), 37–42. Atlantis Press.
Kurniawan, M. (2016). Need analysis sebagai perwujudan konsep filosofi “asuh” dalam merancang pembelajaran pada pendidikan modern. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Bedah Buku FKIP UKSW, 85–94.
Masciuch, S., & Kienapple, K. (1993). The emergence of jealousy in children 4 months to 7 years of age. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 421–435.
Miftakhuddin, A. M., & Zulfiati, H. M. (2019). Misconceptions between social studies and social sciences among pre-service elementary teachers. International Journal of Education, 12(1), 16–25.
Miftakhuddin, M. (2018). Kecenderungan putus sekolah difabel usia pendidikan dasar di Jember. INKLUSI, 5(1), 95–114.
O’leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. Sage.
Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human learning (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Parker, W. C. (2015). Social studies today: Research and practice. Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of physical causality (Vol. 212). Transaction Publishers.
Piaget, J. (2003). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge.
Pujiastuti, W. (1998). Konsep manusia sebagai pamong menurut Ki Hadjar Dewantara. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Purwandari, N. R. (2016). Implementasi sistem among dalam penanaman karakter di kelas IV SD Taman Muda Ibu Pawiyatan. Basic Education, 5(33), 139–164.
Rahmah, Y. D. (2014). Implementasi program sekolah adiwiyata (studi pada Sekolah Dasar Negeri Manukan Kulon III/540 Kota Surabaya). Brawijaya University.
Samho, B., & Yasunari, O. (2009). Konsep pendidikan Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan tantangan-tantangan implementasinya di Indonesia dewasa ini. Research Report-Humanities and Social Science, 1(1), 1–74.
Seefeldt, C., Castle, S., & Falconer, R. C. (2014). Social studies fot the preschool/primary child. USA: Pearson Education.
Sukendar, A., Usman, H., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2019). Teaching-loving-caring (asah-asih-asuh) and semi-military education on character education management. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 292–304.
Tannebaum, R. P. (2018). Teaching about religion within early childhood and elementary social studies: exploring how preservice teachers perceive their rights and responsibilities as educators. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(4), 30–48.
Towaf, S. M. (2016). The national heritage of Ki Hadjar Dewantara in Tamansiswa about culture-based education and learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(23), 167–176.
Verma, R. (2005). Rabindranath tagore’s influence on the Indonesia nationalist educational movements of 1920s and 1930s: Ki Hadjar Dewantara and the Taman Siswa. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 66, 1283–1289. JSTOR.
Wahyuningsih, S., Dewi, N. K., & Hafidah, R. (2018). Implementation of among system A3 (Asah, Asih, Asuh) in planting the value of characters in early childhood. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 1(1), 822–826.
Wangid, M. N. (2009). Sistem among pada masa kini: Kajian konsep dan praktik pendidikan. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 39(2), 129–140.
Wiryopranoto, S., Herlina, N., Marihandono, D., & Tangkilisan, Y. B. (2017). Ki Hajar Dewantara: Pemikiran dan perjuangannya. Museum Kebangkitan Nasional.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um032v6i1p41-52
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi Sosial (JPDS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial and Administration Office:
This Journal is published by Universitas Negeri Malang, under the management of Faculty of Social Science.
Semarang St. No. 5 Building I3, Pos Code: 65145.
Phone. (0341) 551312.
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpds/index
E-ISSN 2655-2469
Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi Sosial (JPDS) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License,