Email this article 
Clinical Language Intervention Programme (KLISA PROGRAMME) to Improve Reading Skill of Students with Learning Disability with Potential in Education
Abstract
Reading is one of the fundamental skills across all subjects. A student with low competency in reading will experience difficulties in teaching and learning. The purpose of this research is to improve reading skills among student with learning disability in one secondary school in Bangi, Selangor. This action research had employed Reading Assessment Approach and descriptive analysis in data collection. Seven students with reading problem participated in this research. However, these students were having potential to be included in either Inclusive Program or Job Transition Program. Therefore, one reading program known as KLISA Program (Language Clinic Program) was created and it has been implemented in classroom for 30 minutes during the first period every day. This 9-month program had employed phonics method and used a set of ‘Bacalah Anakku’ books and ABM Velcro in three phases. The reading assessment was conducted at the end of each phase to evaluate the students’ achievement in reading. The findings of this research proved that KLISA Program was effective for students’ improvement in reading. Hence, it is recommended that this program can be consistently implemented to overcome illiterate and reading disorder among primary and secondary school students.
Kemahiran membaca adalah merentas semua matapelajaran. Kelemahan dalam kemahiran membaca akan menyebabkan kesulitan mengikuti pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemahiran membaca di kalangan murid-murid bermasalah pembelajaran di sebuah sekolah menengah di Bangi, Selangor. Penelitian tindakan ini menggunakan pendekatan penilaian penaksiran bacaan dan analisis deskriptif untuk mengumpul data, Seramai 7 orang murid dalam sebuah kelas terlibat dalam kajian ini. Mereka terdiri dari murid bermasalah pembelajaran yang berpotensi untuk diserapkan di dalam Program Inklusif atau Transisi pekerjaan tetapi masih tidak boleh membaca. Satu program pemulihan bacaan iaitu Program KLISA (Program Klinik Bahasa) dilaksanakan selama 30 menit masa pertama sesi pengajaran setiap hari persekolahan. Pelaksanaan program ini menekankan kaedah fonik menggunakan set buku ‘Bacalah Anakku’ dan ABM Velcro serta dibuat dalam 3 gelungan yang mengambil masa 9 bulan. Penilaian bacaan dibuat setiap 3 bulan yang mewakili satu gelungan untuk melihat pencapaian murid dalam bacaan. Penilaian tersebut dibuat menggunakan satu set instrumen penilaian yang mewakili 8 tahap bacaan. Hasil penelitian membuktikan peningkatan kemahiran bacaan yang memberansangkan di kalangan murid-murid yang terlibat. Justeru itu disarankan program seumpamanya dilaksanakan secara konsisten bagi mengatasi masalah buta huruf dan tidak pandai membaca dikalangan murid-murid peringkat rendah dan menengah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atan, L. (1988). Psikologi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
Barbara, F., Michael, C., Carolyn, A. D., Joseph, D., Lynda, H., Laura, J., Warnick, L., & Richard, W. (2016). Faundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding in Kindergarden Through 3rd Grade. Educator’s Practice Guide. Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE).
Britta, L. F. (2014). A comparison of the Effectiveness of a toke economy system, a response cost condition and a combination condition in reducing problem behaviour and increasing student academic engagement and performance in two first grade classroom. Tesis dan Disertasi. Cornerstone. Minnesota State University.
Carol M., Paul A., Donald L. & Rollanda E. (2014). Improving Reading Outcomes for students with or at risk for Reading Disabilities. IES National Center for Special Education Research. Washington DC
Eithne, K., Elizabeth, D., Bernadette, D., Geraldine, H., Therese, M., Jackie, M., Maura, O., & Gerry, S. (2012). Literacy in Early Chilhood and Primary Education (3-8 years). Research Report No. 15. National Council for Curiculum and Assessment.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Dlm J.F Kavanagh & I. G Mattingly (Eds), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hulya, K. (2012). Improving reading skill through effective reading strategies. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 70: 709-714
Jamian, A. R. (2011). Permasalahan kemahiran membaca dan menulis Bahasa Melayu murid-murid sekolah rendah di luar bandar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu 1(1): 1-12
Jennifer B., Ellie H. & Kandi K. (2013). The Effect of Reading in Comprehension for Elementary Age Learners. Master of Arts in Education Action Research. St. Catherine University.
Joanne, Y. (2000). Alphabetic Part II. National Reading Panel, hlm 2:89-2:99.Oregon Trail School District.
Karsten, R., & Gilles, P. (2013). What is bottom-up and what is top-down in predictive coding?. Hypothesis and Theory Article 4(276):1-8
Kemmis, S., & Taggart, R. M. (1988). The Action Eesearch Planner: Action research and the analysis of pedagogy. Australia: Deakin University.
Kristen R. (2015). Investment in Reading Reserch from Kindergarten through High School. IES National Center for Special Education Research. Washington DC
Lisbeth, M. B. (2015). How teacher teach and readers read: Developing reading comprehension in English in Norwegian upper secondary school. Tesis Ph.D. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Sciences. University of Oslo.
Liyana, A. A., Nurul, F. H., Khuzaiton, Z. (2013). Persepsi dan pengalaman guru pendidikan khas dalam menghadapi permasalahan disleksia dalam kemahiran literasi. Seminar Sains Kemanusiaan OKU Peringkat Kebangsaan 2013 (SKOKU). Pusat Pengajian Bahasa danPembangunan Insaniah (PPBPI) Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK) , Kelantan, 19 Mei.
Marie, P. E. M. (2016). Participatory Action Research (PAR) cum Action Research (AR) in Teacher Profesional Development:A literature
Marissa, K. H., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study Strategies of college students: Are self testing and scheduling related to achievement. Pychon Bull Rev 19: 126-134
Mary, N., Lucy, F., Yvonne, M., & Diarmuid, O. (2012). Effective Intrevention for Struggling Readers. A good practice guide for teacher. National Educational Psychological.Service. www. education. ie / en / Publications /Education - Reports [1 Disember 2016]
Masello, H. P. (2014). Introducing Beginning Reading Using Phonics Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 (10): 477-483
Munji, S. H. (1990). Pengantar Psikologi. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti
Pearson, P. D., & Cervetti, G. N. (2013). The psychology and pedagogy of reading processes. Dlm W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Educational Psychology, V. VII, of Handbook of psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 507-554). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ryan, H. (2013). The Effect of Classroom Enviroment on Student learning.http://scholar works. wmich. edu / honors _ theses[15 Disember 2016]
Tahar, M. M., Yasin, M. H. M. (2010). Reading skills among year one students in Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9(2010):378-383
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and Development. Mind in Society (pp. 79-91) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um029v4i12017p16-23
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Luar Biasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal "Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Luar Biasa" Indexing by:
