SETS AS A VISION AND APPROACH TO LEARNING THROUGH FIELD STUDY AND SKYPE

Dian Nugraheni, Novida Pratiwi, Munzil Munzil, Muhardjito Muhardjito

Abstract


The goal of Learning Basic Chemistry 1 is to help students comprehend the notion of chemistry and how it relates to circumstances, daily life, and technology. It adopts the vision and methodology of SETS. With this effort, students gain literacy in science, environment, technology, and society needed in the present and the future. In blended learning, time and location restrictions during field lectures are removed for both students and lecturers by using Skype. The development research is produced in the form of YouTube channels and vlogs, which are the current features of digital learning. Increasing students' comprehension of chemistry in SETS by exposing them to it as a science and allowing them to engage with it directly is another significant benefit of SETS learning.

Keywords


Blended Learning; Field Study; SETS; Skype

Full Text:

PDF

References


Binadja, A. (2005). Pedoman Praktis Pembelajaran Sains Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2004 Bervisi dan Berpendekatan SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society), Bahan Pelatihan Pembelajaran Inovatif untuk Guru SMA/MA. Semarang: Laboratorium SETS UNNES.

Fink, A., Cahill, M.J., Mc Daniel, M.A., Hoffmana, A., & Frey, R.F., (2018). Improving General Chemistry Performance through a Growth Mindset Intervention: Selective Effects on Underrepresented Minorities. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 19(3), 783-806.

Galib, L.M. (2009). Pendekatan Sains Teknologi-Masyarakat dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 34.

Kusumaningrum, Y.D., Budiasih, E., & Suharti. (2021). Effect of Integration of SETS (Science-Environment-Technology-Society) in 7E Learning Cycle on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330, 020014.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R., (2017). What Works and Why? Student Perceptions of ‘Useful’ Digital Technology in University Teaching and Learning, Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.

Morrison. (2018). Science, Technology, and Society Studies. Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 4.

Munzil, Yulianti, E., Mustikasari, V.R., & Affriyenni, Y. (2020). Dokumen Formal Kurikulum 2020 Sarjana Pendidikan IPA FMIPA UM. Malang: Prodi Pendidikan IPA.

Skinner, B.F. (2016). The Technology of Teaching. Massachusetts: B. F. Skinner Foundation.

Ultay, N. & Calık, M. (2007). A Thematic Review of Studies into the Effectiveness of Context-Based Chemistry Curricula. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 21(6), 686-701.

Widiastuti, N. L. G. K. & Purnawijaya, I. P. E. (2021). Improving Science Learning Outcomes through the SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society) Approach, Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(2).

Zoller, U. (2013). Science, Technology, Environment Society (STES) Literacy for Sustainability: What Should it Take in Chem/Science Education?. Educación Química, 24(2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um033v7i1p1-3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains

Study Program of Sciences Education
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
Universitas Negeri Malang
Lisensi Creative Commons
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

View My Stats