Keterlaksanaan Program Praktik Industri Program Keahlian Teknik Pemesinan Di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen Menggunakan Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to observe the implementation of industrial training program using Kirkpatrick evaluation model which focuses on the human source development. This study utilizes the Kirkpatrick four-level training evaluation model consisting of reaction, learning, behaviour, and result. The subjects of this study are students of mechanical engineering program and a few of industrial training tutors in SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen. This study used questionnaires, tests, and documentations as the instruments. The results shows that in the reaction level, the level of performance of the trained students using indicators such as facilities, material, instructors, time, and infrastructure are within the good category. The results of pre-test and post-test of the learning aspects—with the mean value of 61,83 and mean value of 80,83—show that there is significant change to the performance. From behaviour level, referring to tutor assessments using indicators such as communication proficiency, intellectuality, cognitive and motoric strategy, as well as student behaviours are also within the good category. Result shows mean value of 83,7 (> Minimum Criteria of Mastery Learning 75) thus resulting in good category.
Keywords: Evaluation, Industrial Training, Kirkpatrick, Program Implementation, SMK
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agrawal, T. 2013. Vocational Education and Training Program (VET): an Asian Perspective. Asia–Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1): 15-26. [7]
Arikunto, S. & Jabar. 2009. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. [10]
Akturuzzaman, & Clement. 2011. Vocational Education and Training (VET) in Human Resource Development: A Case Study of Bangladesh. Academic Research Journal Internasional. 1 (7). 266-275. [4]
Aminah, H. 2015. Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick dan Aplikasinya dalam Pelaksanaan Pelatihan (Level Reaksi dan Pembelajaran) di Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Perum Jakarta. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia. 6 (1). 376-394. [25]
Bates, R. 2004. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Journal Evaluation and Program Planning .27 341-347. [18]
Cox, J 2006. The Quality of an Instructional Program. National Education Association Alaska. http//www.ak.nea.org./excellence/coxquality. Diakses 20 Oktober 2019. [26]
Chatterjee, K., Yadav, A., Ananad, N., Malik, A., Kotwal, A & Kunte R. 2018. Use of Kirkpatrick’s Model for Evaluation of Reaction and Learning of Participant of National Level Workshop on Linear Regression. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 5 (11). 4909-4011. [29]
Depdikbud. 2017. Pedoman Praktik Kerja Lapangan. Jakarta. Depdikbud. [6]
Fatimah, N., Gunawan., & Wahyudi. 2016. Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Fisika Siswa Kelas XI SMKN 1 Lingsar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2 (4). [36]
Foong, Y & Khoo, H. 2015. Attitude, Learning Environment and Current Knowledge Enhancement of Accounting Students in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 5 (1). 202-221. [40]
Irawan, V.T. 2017. Blended Learning Based on Schoology: Effort of Improvement Learning Outcome and Practicum Chance in Vocational High School. Curriculum & Teaching Studies│ Research Article. 4 (1282031). [24]
Juliyanti. 2013. Peran DUDI dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Sistem Ganda di SMKN I Salatiga. Tahun 2013/2014. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Salatiga: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. [8]
Kirkpatrick, D.L. & KirkPatrick J.D. 2006. Evaluating Training Program the Four Levels. San Francisco: Berret Kohler Publisher, Inc. [15]
Kotler, P. 2003. The Art of Building Cutomer Value. Jakarta: LPMB [14]
Lia, N., Syamwil R, & Widayani, S. 2017. Model Pembelajaran Keterampilan Vokasional Berbasis Potensi Lokal di SMA Wilayah Kalimantan. Journal of Vocational and Career Education. 2 (2). 50-58. [34]
Linzalone, R & Schiuma, G. 2015. A Review of Program and Project Evaluation Models Measuring Business. Business Journal and Management. 19 (3). 90 – 99. [12]
Mefinal, D.A. 2017. Studi Pelaksanaan Praktik Kerja Industri untuk Mempersiapkan Tenaga Terampil di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen. Tahun 2016/2017. Skripsi tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Malang. [19]
Meghe, B & Muley, A. 2013. Evaluation of Training and Development Practices of CTPS Using Kirkpatrick Method: A Case Study. International Journal of Application or Innovation Engineering & Management, ISSN 2319-4847. [23]
Mukhadis, A. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Bidang Pendidikan dan Contoh Aplikasinya. Malang: Aditya Media Publishing. [11]
Pamekas, R. 2016. Pelaksanaan Praktik Kerja Industri Peserta Didik Kelas XI Kompetensi Keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran SMK Bopkri 1 Yogyakarta. Tahun 2016/2017. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Administrasi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. [28]
Putera, A.D. 2018. Pengangguran Berkurang 14000 Orang dalam Setahun Terakhir. (https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2018/05/07/173131526/bps-pengangguran-berkurang-140000- orang-dalam-setahun-terakhir). Diakses 1 Oktober 2018[1]
Pratt, B & Peterson, M. 2015. The Role of Physical Therapists in Advancing Special Education. Journal Interdisciplinary Connections to Special Education. 47-66[38]
Silberman, Melvin L. (2006). Active Training: AHandbook of Technique, Designs, Case Examples, and Tips. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer an Inprint of Wiley. [16]
Spacy. 2014. Models of Learning and Literacy Development. Journal education RMIT University, 4. 31-45. [36]
Sukardi. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. [13]
Sukoco. 2015. SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen Jadi SMK Rujukan Tahun ini Siap Membina 10-16 SMK Sekitarnya. (Online) (http://www.smkm1kpn.sch.id). Diakses 1 Oktober 2018. [9]
Sunardi & Sudjimat, D.A. 2016. Magang Industri untuk Meningkatkan Relevansi Kompetensi Profesional Guru Produktif SMK. Jurnal Teknologi dan Kejuruan. 39 (2). 171-182. [22]
Syahroni, A. 2014. Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Manfaat Pelaksanaan Praktek Kerja Industri di SMKN 1 Lembah Gumanti. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 2 (1). 275-831. [21]
Syarifah, N. 2013, Analisis Praktik Kerja Industri Ditinjau dari Peningkatan Kompetensi Siswa SMK. Tahun 2013/2014. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. [42]
Wicaksono, G. 2013. Penerapan Teknik Bermain Peran dalam Bimbingan Kelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Interpersonal Siswa Kelas X Multimedia SMK IKIP Surabaya. Jurnal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling. 1 (1). 61-78. [31]
Woods, D. 2008. The impact of VET on Transition to Work for Young People in Australia. Journal Vocational Education. 50 (6). 465-473. [5]
Yoto. 2016. Model Alternatif Pengembangan SMK di Indonesia (Upaya Penyiapan Tenaga Kerja Terampil di Industri). Paper pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Kejuruan “Tantangan Pendidikan Kejuruan Abad XXI” tahun 2016 di Universitas Negeri Malang, Tanggal 24 September 2016. [2]
Zimmermann, N. 2017. Germany Exports A Secret Of Its Success: Vocational Education, DW (Deutsche Welle). Dari (http:// www.dw.com/en/germany-exports-a-secret-of- its-success-vocational-education/a-38114840) diakses pada 10 juli 2019. [3]
Zunanda, M & Sinulingga, K. 2015. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 4(1). [37]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um054v3i1p34-42
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Teknik Mesin dan Pembelajaran
Alamat Editorial:
Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik
Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang No.5 Kota Malang 65145,
Phone. (0341) 551312 psw 298,
email: jtmp@um.ac.id
Website: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jtmp/index
E-ISSN 2623-1271
This work is licensed under a CC BY SA 4.0.
View My Stats