Selection of Marine Security Policy  using Fuzzy-AHP TOPSIS Hybrid Approach

Hozairi Hozairi; Buhari Buhari; Heru Lumaksono; Marcus Tukan

doi:10.17977/um018v2i12019p19-30

Selection of Marine Security Policy using Fuzzy-AHP TOPSIS Hybrid Approach

Hozairi Hozairi, Buhari Buhari, Heru Lumaksono, Marcus Tukan

Abstract

The research was focused on the integration of Fuzzy set theory with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to choose the optimum maritime security policy to achieve Indonesia recognition as the world's maritime axis. The method used is AHP with fuzzy based enhancement. Here, the weight of each criterion is calculated to overcome the criticism of the scale of unbalanced rating, uncertainty, and inaccuracy in the pairwise of comparison process. The best recommendation for Indonesian maritime policies is multi task single agency which is greatly infuenced by several factors such as technology, regulations, infrastructure, economic, politic, and socio-culture. The finding shows that the hybrid approach is able to produce the best recommendation for Indonesian maritime security policy.

Full Text:

PDF

References

I. N. P. A, A. Hakim, S. H. Pramono, and A. S. Leksono, “The Effect of Strategic Environment Change toward Indonesia Maritime Security : Threat and Opportunity,” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 6037–6044, 2017.

A. P. Lis Gindarsah, “Indonesia’s Maritime Doctrine and Security Concerns,” 2014.

I. Chapsos and J. A. Malcolm, “Maritime security in Indonesia : Towards a comprehensive agenda?,” Mar. Policy, vol. 76, no. April 2016, pp. 178–184, 2017.

G. Wasito, “The authority of BAKAMLA in the enforcement of certain criminal acts at sea is based on Law No. 32 of 2014 concerning maritime affairs,” 2015.

U. Muawanah et al., “Review of national laws and regulation in Indonesia in relation to an ecosystem approach to fisheries management,” Mar. Policy, vol. 91, no. August 2017, pp. 150–160, 2018.

A. H. I Nengah Putra A, “Analyze opportunities and threats of Indonesian maritime security as a result of the development of a strategic environment,” 2016.

M. Ilangkumaran and S. Kumanan, “Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1009–1022, 2009.

C. Bueger, “What is maritime security?,” Mar. Policy, vol. 53, pp. 159–164, 2015.

S. A. Ghassemi and S. Danesh, “A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for desalination process selection,” Desalination, vol. 313, pp. 44–50, 2013.

H. Lumaksono, “The selection of suitable fishing gear for fishermen in Madura Island using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS,” Ecoterra, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 34–51, 2018.

O. Gottfried et al., “SWOT-AHP-TOWS analysis of private investment behavior in the Chinese biogas sector,” J. Clean. Prod., 2018.

L. a. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.

S. H. Zyoud et al., “A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment : Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2012.

X. Yu, S. Zhang, X. Liao, and X. Qi, “ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 424, pp. 301–316, 2018.

A. Zandi and E. Roghanian, “Extension of Fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 258–263, 2013.

S. Corrente, S. Greco, and R. SŁowiński, “Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 820–846, 2013.

A. Loganathan and I. Mani, “A fuzzy based hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology for phase change material selection in electronics cooling system,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2943–2950, 2018.

S. Dožić, T. Lutovac, and M. Kalic, “Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 68, pp. 165–175, 2018.

D.-Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996.

P. Sirisawat and T. Kiatcharoenpol, “Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 117, no. April 2017, pp. 303–318, 2018.

T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 6577–6585, 2011.

Y. K. Hozairi, “Decision Support System Determination of Main Work Unit in WPP-711 using Fuzzy TOPSIS,” Knowl. Eng. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 2018.

M. S. Problem, “Combined Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Method for Solvinglocation Problem,” vol. 8, pp. 373–383, 2006.

A. T. Gumus, “Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 4067–4074, 2009.

G. Büyüközkan and G. Çifçi, “A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, pp. 2341–2354, 2012.

R. K. Shukla, D. Garg, and A. Agarwal, “An integrated approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination,” Prod. Manuf. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 415–438, 2014.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um018v2i12019p19-30