Mobile Learning Media for Enhanced Motivation in Audio and Video Processing: A Vocational Multimedia Approach

M. Nuran Fadilah, Azhar Ahmad, Yunus Yunus

Abstract


activities to be replaced by technology. Based on the results of observations and initial observations made at SMKN 1 Pasuruan, at SMK PGRI 8 Malang, and at SMKN 3 Kota Bima, a problem was found, namely difficulties in understanding the material in the subject of Audio and Video Processing Engineering because the media was lacking. The objectives of the research activities were to develop mobile-based learning media, describe learning media, analyze the feasibility of learning media, and describe the level of student learning motivation. The developed learning media is stored in .apk format so that it can be operated on a smartphone. The learning media development model adapts the Plomp development model, consisting of an initial investigation or preliminary research phase, a development or prototyping phase, and an assessment phase. In the initial investigation phase or preliminary research, analyze the learning of audio and video processing techniques and find a problem. Then, in the development or prototype phase, there were validation results from media experts of 91.31 per cent and results from material experts of 93.3 per cent. Finally, in the testing phase of the field test on 26 students, the results were 86.71 per cent, and the measurement of learning motivation was 82.85 per cent. Referring to the results of the research, the implementation of the mobile-based learning media that was developed is very feasible to be applied in the learning process. It is quite efficient and effective in increasing student learning motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. C. Pianta, “Teacher-Student Interactions: Measurement, Impacts, Improvement, and Policy,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 98–105, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/-23727-322-15-62-24-57.

C. Broom, “Empowering students: Pedagogy that benefits educators and learners,” Citizenship, Soc. Econ. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 79–86, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2047173415597142.

N. S. K. Pang, “Teachers’ Reflective Practices in Implementing Assessment for Learning Skills in Classroom Teaching,” ECNU Rev. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 470–490, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1177/20-965-31120936290/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_2096531120936290-FIG1.JPEG.

T. Muir, I. Wang, A. Trimble, C. Mainsbridge, and T. Douglas, “Using Interactive Online Pedagogical Approaches to Promote Student Engagement,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, p. 415, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12060415.

J. Lv, “Improving college student engagement and motivation in a gamified learning environment: the pilot study in China,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 6986–6994, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04884-8.

R. E. Mayer, “Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning,” Learn. Instr., vol. 29, pp. 171–173, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016-/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003.

A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 275–285, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.101-6/j.-susoc.2022.05.004.

M. D. Abdulrahaman et al., “Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11. Elsevier, p. e05312, Nov. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/-j.heliyon.-2020.-e05312.

Mazidah, M. Erna, and L. Anwar, “Developing an Interactive Chemistry E-Module for Salt Hydrolysis Material to Face the Covid-19 Pandemic,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, Oct. 2020, p. 012051. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/-1655/-1/012051.

K. Bause, A. Radimersky, M. Iwanicki, and A. Albers, “Feasibility studies in the product development process,” in Procedia CIRP, Elsevier, Jan. 2014, pp. 473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.128.

K. L. Yeung, S. K. Carpenter, and D. Corral, “A Comprehensive Review of Educational Technology on Objective Learning Outcomes in Academic Contexts,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 33, no. 4. Springer, pp. 1583–1630, Dec. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09592-4.

M. Cents-Boonstra, A. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, E. Denessen, N. Aelterman, and L. Haerens, “Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: an observation study of teacher and student behaviors,” Res. Pap. Educ., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 754–779, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184.

M. Bouckaert, “Current Perspectives on Teachers as Materials Developers: Why, What, and How?,” RELC J., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 439–456, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0033688218810549.

A. Krulatz and M. Christison, “Developing and Using Teaching Materials,” in Multilingual Approach to Diversity in Education (MADE), Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2023, pp. 79–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-17335-6_4.

L. Flórez-Aristizábal, S. Cano, C. A. Collazos, F. Benavides, F. Moreira, and H. M. Fardoun, “Digital transformation to support literacy teaching to deaf Children: From storytelling to digital interactive storytelling,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 38, pp. 87–99, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.002.

S. Simões, T. Oliveira, and C. Nunes, “Influence of computers in students’ academic achievement,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 3, p. e09004, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um010v7i12024p01-06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 Letters in Information Technology Education (LITE)
 2654-5667
 Contact
 Published by Electrical Engineering, Universitas Negeri   Malang, Indonesia
 Jl. Semarang No. 5 Malang, East Java, Indonesia
 Homepage:  http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/lite/index
 E-mail: lite.teum@gmail.com

View My Stats