Industrial Practice Program Evaluation Using the Kirkpatrick Model

Iqbal Ismawanto, Eddy Sutadji, Suharmanto Suharmanto, Didik Nurhadi

Abstract


The research objective was to evaluate the industrial practice programs using the Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, which focuses on human resource development. This study used a four-levels of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, namely reaction, learning, behaviour, and results. The research subjects were the students majoring in mechanical engineering at Private Vocational High School Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen who had done industrial practices. The data was collected using a questionnaire instrument, test, interview, and documentation. Based on the data analysis, the evaluation of the industrial practice program on the student's reaction aspect using the facilities, material, instructor, time, and infrastructure indicators was in the 'good' category. The pre-test and post-test results in the learning aspect experienced an increase, as indicated by the mean values of 61.83 and 80.83. Behavioural aspects based on changes in work behaviour, skills and knowledge generally underwent significant changes. The results aspect showed the impact of graduate work performance on increasing incomes and positions; the data showed that only a small proportion of graduates get this increase. The school can use the results of this study as input in dealing with various problems and the success of industrial practice programs.


Keywords


Evaluation; Industrial Practice; Kirkpatrick; Vocational High School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agrawal, T. (2013). Vocational Education and Training Program (VET): an Asian Perspective. Asia–Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1), 15–26.

Amat Mukhadis. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Bidang Pendidikan dan Contoh Aplikasinya. Aditya Media Publishing.

Aminah, H. (2015). Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick dan Aplikasinya dalam Pelaksanaan Pelatihan (Level Reaksi dan Pembelajaran) di Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Perum Jakarta. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 6 (1), 376–394.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Bates, R. (2004). A Critical Analysis of Evaluation Practice: The Kirkpatrick Model and The Principle of Beneficence. Journal Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 341–347.

Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99 (4), 355–369.

Chatterjee, K., Yadav, A. K., N, A., Malik, A., Kotwal, A., & Kunte, R. (2018). Use of Kirkpatrick's Model for Evaluation of Reaction and Learning of Participant of National Level Workshop on Linear Regression. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 5 (11), 4909–4011.

Cox, J. (2006). The Quality of an Instructional Program.

Depdikbud. (2017). Pedoman Praktik Kerja Lapangan. Depdikbud.

Gharaibeh, K., Harb, B., Salameh, H. B., Zoubi, A., Shamali, A., Murphy, N., & Brennan, C. (2013). Review and Redesign of the Curriculum of a Masters Programme in Telecommunications Engineering – Towards an Outcome-Based Approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38 (2), 194–210.

Irawan, V. T., Sutadji, E., & Widiyanti. (2017). Blended Learning Based on Schoology: Effort of Improvement Learning Outcome and Practicum Chance in Vocational High School. Curriculum & Teaching Studies. Research Article, 4 (1282031.

Iskandar, M. (2018). Evaluasi Reaction Kirkpatrick pada Program Keahlian Teknik Otomotif di UPT Pelatihan Kerja Pasuruan. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Juliyanti, L. (2013). Peran DUDI dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Sistem Ganda di SMKN I Salatiga. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Program the Four Levels. Berret Kohler Publisher, Inc.

Linzalone, R., & Schiuma, G. (2015). A Review of Program and Project Evaluation Models Measuring Business. Business Journal and Management, 19 (3), 90 – 99.

Matusovich, H. M., Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., & Cory, H. (2014). Faculty Motivation: A Gateway to Transforming Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103 (2), 302–330.

Mefinal, D. A. (2017). Studi Pelaksanaan Praktik Kerja Industri untuk Mempersiapkan Tenaga Terampil di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Evans, R. (2017). Creating Communicative Self-Efficacy through Integrating and Innovating Engineering Communication Instruction. American Society for Engineering Education.

Nidhom, A. N. (2015). Hubungan Kesiapan Belajar, LamaPembelajaran, Kesesuaian Tempat dan Partisipasi DU/DI dengan HasilPrakerin Peserta Didik Kompetensi Keahlian TKJ di SMK Kota Batu. E-Journal Program Studi Pendidikan Kejuruan PascasarjanaUniversitas Negeri Malang.

Pamekas, R. (2016). Pelaksanaan Praktik Kerja Industri Peserta Didik Kelas XI Kompetensi Keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran SMK BOPKRI 1 Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Passow, H. J., & Passow, C. H. (2017). What Competencies Should Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106 (3), 475–526.

Philip, K. (2003). The Art Of Building Customer Value. LPMB.

Putera, A. D. (2018). Pengangguran Berkurang 14000 Orang dalam Setahun Terakhir. https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2018/05/07/173131526/bps-pengangguran-berkurang-140000-orang-dalam-setahun-terakhir

Silberman, M. L., Biech, E., & Auerbach, C. (2006). Active Training: A Handbook of Techniques, Designs, Case Examples, and Tips, 4th Edition. Pfeiffer an Imprint of Wiley.

Sukoco. (2015). SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Kepanjen Jadi SMK Rujukan Tahun ini Siap Membina 10-16 SMK Sekitarnya. http://www.smkm1kpn.sch.id

Sunardi, & Sudjimat, D. A. (2016). Magang Industri untuk Meningkatkan Relevansi Kompetensi Profesional Guru Produktif SMK. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 39 (2), 171–182.

Syahroni, F. (2014). Persepsi Siswa terhadap Manfaat Pelaksanaan Praktek Kerja Industri di SMKN 1 Lembah Gumanti. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 2 (1), 275–831.

Sylvester, A. (2006). Development of strategic international industry links to promote undergraduate vocational training and postgraduate research programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600644412

Werner, N., Dickert, J., Shanmugaraj, N., Monahan, K. G., Wallach, S., & Keating, J. (2017). No Title.

Woods, D. (2018). The impact of VET on Transition to Work for Young People in Australia. Journal Vocational Education, 50 (6), 465–473.

Yoto. (2016). Model Alternatif Pengembangan SMK di Indonesia (Upaya Penyiapan Tenaga Kerja Terampil di Industri).

Zimmermann, N. (2017). Germany exports a secret of its success: vocational education. https://www.dw.com/en/germany-exports-a-secret-of-its-success-vocational-education/a-38114840




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um031v43i22020p99-99

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya

Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya
E-ISSN 2477-0442 (online)

Contact
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145, Building H5,  1st  Floor. 

Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/teknologi-kejuruan
Email: teknologikejuruan.ft@um.ac.id 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.   

View My Stats