Comparison of Decision Support Systems with DEMATEL-SAW and DEMATEL-TOPSIS in the Process of Journal Acceptance: Case study in The Postgraduate E-Journal of State University of Malang

Ahmad Khakim Amrullah, Syaad Patmanthara

Abstract


Concerns about scientific publications have been proliferating in Indonesia. Consequently, the number of published journals in e-journal has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. The growing trend of e-journal hence requires a decision support system in its application. The DSS will help the reviewers in determining the eligibility of an article in the journal’s verification process. Several DSS methods such as DEMATEL, SAW, and TOPSIS, among others, are proposed to provide an effective means in the process. This research aims to present a solid comparison of two combined methods, DEMATEL-SAW and DEMATEL-TOPSIS, as they overcome each method’s shortcomings, in determining the eligibility of an article. The eligibility criteria have been determined as a guide. The calculation results show that the DEMATEL-SAW has a relatively higher degree of accuracy compared to that of DEMATEL-TOPSIS when fewer criteria variables are included, whereas the DEMATEL-TOPSIS method has a higher degree of consistency when being utilized on a variable with more criteria

Keywords


DSS, Comparison, MCDM, DEMATEL-SAW, DEMATEL-TOPSIS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, L. and C. W. R. Adawiyah. (2014). Simple Additive Weighting Methods of Multi criteria Decision Making and Applications: A Decade Review. International Journal of Information Processing and Management, 5(1), 39-49. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjO-rHSuZD_AhXz-DgGHfLEDpYQFnoECA0QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.semanticscholar.org%2Fpaper%2FSimple-Additive-Weighting-Methods-of-Multi-criteria-Abdullah-Adawiyah%2F05a0d6d88b7a86fd783f736532af68e0e297e299&usg=AOvVaw3jY-BN4W89VQjB51PmEI2i

Afshari, A., et al. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511-515. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=bec304ffd086871cdc9dd84cbee6e610da5030d8

Aksakal, M., et al. (2010). An integrated approach for personnel selection with DEMATEL and ANP methods. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 25(4), 905-913. Retrieved from https://avesis.atauni.edu.tr/yayin/93e71560-c10d-46de-bd85-650aaa0f7fc5/an-integrated-approach-for-personel-selection-with-dematel-and-anp-methods

Bastos, T. R., Longaray, A. A., dos Santos Machado, C. M., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Dutra, A. (2023). Fuzzy-MACBETH Hybrid Method: Mathematical Treatment of a Qualitative Scale Using the Fuzzy Theory. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 16(1), 21. Doi: doi.org/10.1007/s44196-023-00195-9

Bulgurcu, B. (2012). Application of TOPSIS Technique for Financial Performance Evaluation of Technology Firms in Istanbul Stock Exchange Market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62(2012), 1033-1040. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.176

Chang, B., et al. (2011). Fuzzy Dematel method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858. Doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114

Chen, L., Li, Z., & Deng, X. (2020). Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers: a new method based on entropy weight and DEMATEL. International journal of systems science, 51(3), 570-583. Doi: 10.1080/00207721.2020.1723731

Chou, S. Y., et al. (2016). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Procedure for Achieving Aspired Earned Value Project Performance. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 7-9. Doi: 10.1155/2016/9721726

Chu-Hua, L., Sun-Weng, H., Mei-Ting, H., Chiao-Bing, L., & Gwo-Hshiung, T. (2023). Improving the Poverty-Alleviating Effects of Bed and Breakfast Tourism Using Z-DEMATEL. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1-15. Doi: 10.1007/s40815-023-01481-6

Ghosh, S., Mandal, M. C., & Ray, A. (2022). Green supply chain management framework for supplier selection: An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 17(3), 205-219. Doi: 10.1080/17509653.2021.1997661

Gunaydin, G., Duvan, G., & Ozceylan, E. (2022). An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Determine the Most Habitable Planet. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 3(2), 151-161. Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-02-04

Jain, V., & Ajmera, P. (2021). DEMATEL method for evaluating FMS variables in the Indian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11(6), 822-838. Doi: doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2021.118321

Josaputri, et al. (2016). Decision Support Systems for The Determination of Cattle with Superior Seeds using AHP and SAW Method. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 3(2), 21-30. Doi: 10.15294/sji.v3i2.7908

Kaya, N. (2021). A review on manufacturing applications of the VIKOR approach. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(4), 1673-1695. Doi: 10.15295/bmij.v9i4.1896

Khanjankhani, K., et al. (2016). Evaluation and Prioritization of Service Quality Dimensions Using Dematel and Topsis (A Case Study in Iran). Bali Medical Journal, 5(2), 298-302. Doi: 10.15562/bmj.v5i2.233

Larsen, O. and M. von Ins. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575-603. Doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z

Liew, K. F., Lam, W. S., & Lam, W. H. (2022). Financial Network Analysis on the Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy–DEMATEL–TOPSIS Model. Entropy, 24(8), 1056. Doi: 10.3390/e24081056

Ortiz-Barrios, M., Gul, M., Yucesan, M., Alfaro-Sarmiento, I., Navarro-Jiménez, E., & Jiménez-Delgado, G. (2022). A fuzzy hybrid decision-making framework for increasing the hospital disaster preparedness: The colombian case. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 72, 102831. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102831

Podvezko, V. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134-146. Doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310

Pourjavad, E., & Shahin, A. (2020). Green supplier development programmes selection: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 463-472. Doi: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1773569

Raut, R. D., Gardas, B. B., Narkhede, B. E., & Narwane, V. S. (2019). To investigate the determinants of cloud computing adoption in the manufacturing micro, small and medium enterprises: A DEMATEL-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(3), 990-1019. Doi: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0060

Rong, Y., Liu, Y., & Pei, Z. (2022). A novel multiple attribute decision-making approach for evaluation of emergency management schemes under picture fuzzy environment. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13, 633-661. Doi: 10.1007/s13042-021-01280-1

Shanker, S., & Barve, A. (2021). Analysing sustainable concerns in diamond supply chain: a fuzzy ISM-MICMAC and DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(5), 1269-1285. Doi: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1862351

Sumrit, D. and P. Anuntavoranich. (2013). Using DEMATEL Method to Analyze the Causal Relations on Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Factors in Thai Technology-Based Firms. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 4(2), 81-103. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/80984163/081-103.pdf

Talebanpour, R. and M. Javadi. (2015). Decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems using DEMATEL and SAW. Decision Science Letters, 4(3), 363-372. Doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2015.4.002

Thor, J., et al (2013). Comparison of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods from The Maintenance Alternative Selection Perspective. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 2(6), 18-25. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=6bb2e8b7de5a934f1df05397f107b7c9c69475e0

Tzeng, C. W., et al. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effect in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044. Doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004

Velasquez, M. and P. T. Hester. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiv4feNu5D_AhVsamwGHdh0D98QFnoECBIQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.orstw.org.tw%2Fijor%2Fvol10no2%2Fijor_vol10_no2_p56_p66.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2p8pctzkYByYhwyi-1ZuAx

Yadav, R. N., Kumar, D., Sharma, A. K., & Virmani, N. (2022). Analysing human and system related barriers of TQM in automobile industries using fuzzy DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 35(2), 193-219. Doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2022.121302

Yazdani, M. (2014). An integrated MCDM approach to green supplier selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(3), 443-458. Doi: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.3.003

Yeganeh, R., Mohammadfam, I., Soltanian, A., & Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. (2022). An integrative fuzzy Delphi decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) study on the risk perception-influencing factors. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1-12. Doi: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2112446.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um031v45i12022p32-41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya

Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya
E-ISSN 2477-0442 (online)

Contact
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145, Building H5,  1st  Floor. 

Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/teknologi-kejuruan
Email: teknologikejuruan.ft@um.ac.id 

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.   

View My Stats