Gema Fitriady, Sugiyanto Sugiyanto, Tatok Sugiarto


The use of online  assessment s has been widely used in various fields including universities. Research to find the validity of online  assessment s has been conducted and the results are high but the opinions of people who are assessed on the application of online  assessment s have not been carried out. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of the person being assessed after conducting an online  assessment . 150 students were selected to be respondents consisting of 126 male and 24 female who were taken by the sampling technique, namely the total sampling. The application of online  assessment s in universities is very suitable. There are several advantages to implementing online  assessment s, including 1) it is preferred by students so that students will be motivated to conduct assessment s; 2) high accessibility and flexibility; 3) rapid feedback. Therefore, the use of online  assessment s in higher education can be done without reducing the quality of the assessment .


assessment; online, cognitive aspects

Full Text:



Adi, S., & Fathoni, A. F. (2020). Mobile Learning sebagai Fasilitas Belajar Mandiri Pembelajaran Senam Lantai pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Ilmu Keolahragaan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(8), 1158–1166. Retrieved from, A., El Fatouhi, D., Dow, C., Correia, E., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., & Fagherazzi, G. (2018). Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a New 44-Item Diet and Food Frequency Questionnaire Among Adults: Online Assessment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(7), e227.

Angus, S. D., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 255–272.

Barefoot, H., Lou, F., & Russell, M. (2011). Peer assessment: Educationally effective and resource efficient. Blended Learning in Practice.

Bransford, J., Brophy, S., & Williams, S. (2000). When computer technologies meet the learning sciences: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59–84.

Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 148.

Bull, J., & McKenna, C. (2004). Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. Psychology Press.

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Taylor & Francis.

Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567–605.

Lemanski, C. (2011). Access and assessment? Incentives for independent study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 565–581.

Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1).

Nasionalita, K., & Nugroho, C. (2020). Indeks Literasi Digital Generasi Milenial di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1), 32–47.

Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715–721.

Pedersen, E. R., Grow, J., Duncan, S., Neighbors, C., & Larimer, M. E. (2012). Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(3), 672.

Putra, Y. S. (2017). Theoritical review: Teori perbedaan generasi. Among Makarti, 9(18).

Rohmiyati, Y. (2018). Model Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Generasi Milenial. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, Dan Informasi, 2(4), 387–392.

Rust, C. (2002). Purposes and principles of assessment. Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, 3–5.

Sorensen, E. K., & Takle, E. S. (2005). Investigating knowledge building dialogues in networked communities of practice. A collaborative learning endeavor across cultures. Interactive Educational Multimedia: IEM, 10, 50.

Swari, I. S. K., Kartono, K., & Walid, W. (2019). Pentingnya Fast Feedback Terhadap Komunikasi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 659–667.

Van Gog, T., Sluijsmans, D. M., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Prins, F. J. (2010). Formative assessment in an online learning environment to support flexible on-the-job learning in complex professional domains. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 311–324.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Article Template Article Template

Gelanggang Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia indexed by:

DOAJ Google ScholarGARUDA   

Gelanggang Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia
Indonesian Physical Education Arena
Prodi Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan
Jurusan Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

ISSN : 2614-8293 (media online) - SK no. 0005.26148293/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2018.01 - 5 Februari 2018

Lisensi Creative Commons

Gelanggang Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats