CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT THINKING IN PROBLEM SOLVING (CASE STUDY ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS)
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akgul, S., & Kahvecil, N. G. (2016). A Study on the Development of a Mathematics Creativity Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62(62), 57–76. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.5
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. Teachers College Press.
Beghetto, R.A., & Sriraman, B. (2017). Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Brousseau, G. (2006). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (Vol. 19). Springer, Berlin.
Cattell, R.B., & Butcher, H.J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. HJ. Oxford: Bobbs-Merrill.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391–404.
Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi, T. (2016). Open-Ended Approach: an Effort in Cultivating Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Esteem in Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18
Foster, C. (2015). The Convergent–Divergent model: an opportunity for teacher–learner development through principled task design. Educational Designer, 2(8), 1–25.
Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building Creative Thinking in the Classroom: From Research to Practice. International Journal Educational Research, 62, 43–50. Retrieved from http://olms.cte.jhu.edu/olms2/data/ck/sites/237/files/Gregory et al.pdf
Hargrove, R. A. (2013). Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6
Haylock, D. W. (1987). A Framework for Assessing Mathematical Creativity in Schoolchilren. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367914
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.
İnce, H., Çenberci, S., & Yavuz, A. (2018). The Relationship between the Attitudes of Mathematics Teacher Candidates towards Scientific Research and Their Thinking Styles. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1467–1476. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060707
Korthagen, F.A., & Kessels, J.P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
Lee, K. S., Hwang, D., & Seo, J. J. (2003). A Development of the Test for Mathematical Creative Problem Solving Ability. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 7(3), 163–189.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students, 9, 129–145.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8
Lin, C. (2017). Threshold Effects of Creative Problem-Solving Attributes on Creativity in the Math Abilities of Taiwanese Upper Elementary Students. Education Research International, 2017, 1–9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4571383
Mastuti, A. G., Nusantara, T., Purwanto, As’ari, A., Subanji, Abadyo, & Susiswo. (2016). Interpretation Awareness of Creativity Mathematics Teacher High School. International Education Studies, 9(9), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n9p32
Newton, D. P. (2013). Moods, emotions and creative thinking: A framework for teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.006
Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: a critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge journal of education, 35(1), 69–87.
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Sriraman, B., Yaftian, N., & Lee, K. (2011). Mathematical creativity and mathematics education. In B.
Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics (pp. 119– 130). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sriwongchai, A., Jantharajit, N., & Chookhampaeng, S. (2015). Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Model for Improving Creative Thinking In Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p77
Stein, M.K., Grover, B.W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Švecová, V., Rumanová, L., & Pavlovičová, G. (2014). Support of Pupil’s Creative Thinking in Mathematical Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1715–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.461
Van Akker, J., & Nieveen, N. (2017). The role of teachers in design research in education. In S. Doff & R. Komoss (Eds.), Making change happen (pp. 75–86). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Warren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28(2010), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.010
Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (Eds.). (2015). Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22. Switzerland: Springer.
Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers’ professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15–20.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Dibenedetto, M.K. (2008). Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for students and teachers in an era of high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 206–216.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Journal of Insight for Mathematics Teaching is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)