Pengembangan Model Ruang Kelas Berbasis Tematik di Sekolah Dasar

Ludfi Arya Wardana; Afib Rulyansah

doi:10.17977/um009v28i22019p125

Pengembangan Model Ruang Kelas Berbasis Tematik di Sekolah Dasar

Ludfi Arya Wardana, Afib Rulyansah

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce a thematic-based classroom model in grade V at Tisnonegaran 1 Elementary School in Probolinggo City. This research and development method used Borg & Gall, which had adapted and consisted of (1) confidential information, (2) planning, (3) product development, (4) expert validation, (5) field trials, (6) final products. The results of the study showed that the learning technology expert validation reached 97.2%, the linguist's validation result showed 90.6%, and the result of the field trial that used readability test met 92.8%. The product of the thematic-based classroom model in primary school has a strong level of validation and a high level of openness. Suggestions for further development can use different classes and levels.

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan model ruang kelas berbasis tematik di sekolah dasar di kelas V di Sekolah Dasar Tisnonegaran 1 di Kota Probolinggo. Metode penelitian dan pengembangan ini menggunakan Borg & Gall yang diadaptasi menjadi 6 tahap yaitu: (1) informasi rahasia, (2) perencanaan, (3) pengembangan produk, (4) validasi ahli, (5) uji coba lapangan, (6) produk akhir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan validasi ahli teknologi pembelajaran 97,2%, validasi ahli bahasa 90,6% dan uji coba lapangan dari tes keterbacaan 92,8%. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa produk pengembangan model ruang kelas tematik di sekolah dasar memiliki tingkat validasi yang kuat dan tingkat keterbukaan yang tinggi. Saran untuk pengembangan lebih lanjut dapat menggunakan kelas dan level yang berbeda.

Keywords

classroom model; thematic-based learning; elementary school; learning environment; model ruang kelas; pembelajaran tematik; sekolah dasar; lingkungan belajar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbar, S., A’yun, I. Q., Satriyani, F., Widodo, W., Paranimmita, R., & Ferisa, D. (2016). Implementasi Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Akbar, S., & Sriwiyana, H. (2011). Pengembangan kurikulum dan pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial. Malang: Cipta Media.

Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7–16). Springer.

Byl, J., & Kloet, B. V. (2014). The Effect of The Physical Classroom Environment on Literacy Outcome. America: United States of America.

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4–12.

Fernanda, G., Asikin, D., & Laksmiwati, T. (2015). Interior Ruang Kelas Sekolah Dasar dengan Pendekatan Konsep Permainan Tradisional pada Program Full day School di Malang. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur, 3(1).

Fisher, E. S. (2008). The effect of the physical classroom environment on literacy outcomes: How 3rd grade teachers use the physical classroom to implement a balanced literacy curriculum (PhD Thesis). University of Missouri–Columbia.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

Harsanto, R. (2007). Pengelolaan kelas yang dinamis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kartika, N. K. R., Natajaya, I. N., & Rihendra, K. (2013). Determinasi Lingkungan Sekolah, Disiplin Belajar, dan Kualitas Pembelajaran Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1).

Karwati, E. (n.d.). Priansa, (2014). Manajemen Kelas Classroom Management Guru Profesional Yang Inspiratif, Kreatif, Menyenangkan Dan Berprestasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2009). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran tematik terpadu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maryana, R., & Rachmawati, Y. (2013). Pengelolaan lingkungan belajar. Prenada Media.

Munawaroh, I. (2012). Esensi “Menghidupkan” Ruang Kelas Bagi Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Efektif. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran.

Ngware, M. W., Ciera, J., Musyoka, P. K., & Oketch, M. (2013). The influence of classroom seating position on student learning gains in primary schools in Kenya. Creative Education, 4(11), 705.

Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011). Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48–64.

Pranandari, I. W., Degeng, I. N. S., & Hanurawan, F. (2016). Korelasi Antara Persepsi Siswa Tentang Pengelolaan Kelas, Hubungan Teman Sebaya (Peer Relationships), dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri Kecamatan Sananwetan Kota Blitar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 480–485.

Prastowo, A. (2013). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26.

Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., La Paro, K. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). The contribution of classroom setting and quality of instruction to children’s behavior in kindergarten classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 105(4), 377–394.

Rofiq, A. (2009). Pengelolaan kelas. Malang: Direktorat Jendral PMPTK.

Stires, L. (1980). Classroom seating location, student grades, and attitudes: Environment or self-selection? Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 241–254.

Syaifurahman, T. U. (2013). Manajemen dalam pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Weinstein, C. S. (1981). Classroom design as an external condition for learning. Educational Technology, 21(8), 12–19.

Wetherill, E. A. (2002). Classroom design for good hearing. Better Schools for a New Century, American Institute of Architects San Francisco, April 1999.

Williamson, J. (2008). Literacy in the Student-centered Classroom: A Practical Approach to Setup, Design, and Implementation. R&L Education.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um009v28i22019p125