Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research and theoretical developments.
The Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya publishes manuscripts in a wide variety of research areas in the field of engineering education. This journal published articles containing conceptual ideas, literature review, application of the theory, and book review regarding technological and vocational education in engineering education. We invite relevant reports in the scopes of:  
1. Mechanical Engineering Education 
2. Automotive Education
3. Civil Engineering Education
4. Construction Engineering Education
5. Electrical Engineering Education
6. Informatics Education
7. Fashion Education
8. Culinary Education
9. Tourism Education


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial Februari 2017

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editorial September 2017

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editorial Februari 2018

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editorial September 2018

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Each article will enter through plagiarism screening process using Google Scholar and Turnitin. The next article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers are single blind. Decision admissibility of articles made by chairman of the board through editors board meetings based on the comments reviewers.



Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

Teknologi dan Kejuruan: Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya e-ISSN: 2477-0442) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Teknologi dan Kejuruan journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Malang as publisher of Teknologi dan Kejuruan journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Engineering Universitas Negeri Malang and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful an necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Teknologi dan Kejuruan journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscript author.